Liberal Forum

Huey » Yesterday, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:05 am

I didn't put much thought into your answer.

In the past you were real good at putting words in my mouth, now you are telling me what I think.  You are wrong of course.

You are just looking for fight.  Carry on.

Nope. you did not  like my answer
 

• Individuals earning $75,000 or less received the full $1,200.
• Married couples filing jointly earning $150,000 or less received $2,400.
• Heads of household earning $112,500 or less also qualified for full amounts

/////////////-------Trumps stimulus package first term
 

jerra b » Yesterday, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:27 am

Why should I answer, you ignore my answers.

I answered anyway
 
 

Why are your answers ignored by people honoring social consensus generated realities typecasting people performing as historical stereotypes by rule of law or face consequences from their own reality first for anti-social behavior(uncompromising with relative time logistics), insubordination, treason, blasphemy?

which path is the least resistance to everyone corrupted by the same social engineering of outcomes in every reality measured by daily clocked obedience and predetermined calendar events?

A natural brain isn't allowed to discuss what it navigates every heartbeat forward since conception. Reality only honors ideas beyond date of birth.

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2026, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2026, 4:35 pm

Everyone on this board knows that you would be saying the opposite if it were Obama doing it.

That makes you a typical lying leftist piece of ****. You COULD speak truth; You CHOOSE to lie.

Shows how ignorant you are, asshole!
I'd be DELIGHTED to take a $5000 gift from ANY Democrat who wants to give me one, and I know that there are millions of American voters who are far worse off economically than I am!  Personally, I'd probably donate some of that $5000 to the presidential campaign of JD Vance in 2028!  And it wouldn't matter that I still would vote Republican, because I know that in my deep blue state of NJ, a Republican wouldn't stand a chance anyway.

Only a complete moron like yourself who has spent weeks whining about the high price of gas would not enthusiastically take Trump's $5000 offer.  Even a liberal can't be that dumb!  But it will mostly help solidify the Republicans running for Congress who are in states where the race is within a few points, and that should be sufficient for Republicans to hold the majority.

Now tell me, asshole.  You think independent voters struggling with bills to pay won't be influenced by the offer enough to sway their choice when they go vote?  How many minorities in solid blue cities won't think twice about dumping their Democrat reps (after seeing how corrupt they are anyway) overboard to grab that gift, especially after also seeing the damage that Biden's millions of illegals have done to their city and state?  Think they're all blind to what's going on in France, the UK, and Germany who have opened their borders to illegals and hoards of Muslim radicals and are fearful of letting Democrats open our border once again?

Thankfully, not all voters are as dumb as you!      
 

Huey » 21 Oct 2026, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2026, 2:09 pm

While I am against all these subsidies did you have a problem with Joe Biden's Covid checks?  I was against Trumps.

If not, STFU.

I await your diversion.

Why did you ask this question?

jerrab » Yesterday, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:01 pm

Why did you ask this question?

Because bitching about these checks is very partisan.
 

Huey » Yesterday, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:09 pm

Because bitching about these checks is very partisan.

No, bitching about trump buying  the election with tax payer money is not partisan
 

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 8:08 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:09 pm

Because bitching about these checks is very partisan.

No, bitching about trump buying  the election with tax payer money is not partisan
 

 

As long as you bitched about it when Biden was Prez I am good with it.

Also, we are still waiting on his other checks.  That tell you anything?  You may go away now.  Don't go away mad, just go the **** away.

Huey » Yesterday, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:07 pm

As long as you bitched about it when Biden was Prez I am good with it.

Also, we are still waiting on his other checks.  That tell you anything?  You may go away now.  Don't go away mad, just go the **** away.

do you mean the checks for rich people?
--------------------------------------------

AI Overview



President Donald Trump's one-time $90 Medicare Part B rebate checks do not apply to Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans. [1, 2]

Key Details on Eligibility and Exclusions

• Who Gets the $90: The one-time $90 payment goes to approximately 20 to 21 million enrollees in traditional (original) Medicare Part B to help offset standard monthly premiums. [1, 2, 3]

• Who Is Excluded: Around 35 million Medicare Advantage enrollees are not eligible for the payment. Also excluded are individuals receiving Medicaid premium assistance (Medicare Savings Programs), high-earners paying the Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA), and people living outside the U.S.. [1, 2, 3, 4]

• Funding and Delivery: The $2 billion program is funded by the Medicare Improvement Fund and distributed via automatic direct deposit or Treasury paper check starting in October 2026. [1, 2, 3]

People cc who don't need advantage are rich and the people receiving help with part b certainly are  not  rich.

jerrab » Yesterday, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:19 pm

do you mean the checks for rich people?
--------------------------------------------

AI Overview

President Donald Trump's one-time $90 Medicare Part B rebate checks do not apply to Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans. [1, 2]

Key Details on Eligibility and Exclusions

• Who Gets the $90: The one-time $90 payment goes to approximately 20 to 21 million enrollees in traditional (original) Medicare Part B to help offset standard monthly premiums. [1, 2, 3]

• Who Is Excluded: Around 35 million Medicare Advantage enrollees are not eligible for the payment. Also excluded are individuals receiving Medicaid premium assistance (Medicare Savings Programs), high-earners paying the Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA), and people living outside the U.S.. [1, 2, 3, 4]

• Funding and Delivery: The $2 billion program is funded by the Medicare Improvement Fund and distributed via automatic direct deposit or Treasury paper check starting in October 2026. [1, 2, 3]

People cc who don't need advantage are rich and the people receiving help with part b certainly are  not  rich.

Nope. You can't be this dumb.


AI Overview

President Donald Trump has repeatedly promised $2,000 "tariff dividend" checks (and later expanded up to $5,000 pledges) funded by import tariff revenues, though no $2,000 checks have been approved or distributed.

I told you to go away. You are really looking pretty dumb right now, granny.

Why Medicare Advantage is Excluded

The administration is funding the $2 billion payout by drawing from the Medicare Improvement Fund, a fund legally designated by Congress to make improvements exclusively to the traditional fee-for-service (Original Medicare) program.
Because Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans are managed by private commercial insurance companies rather than the traditional federal fee-for-service model, its 35 million enrollees do not qualify for the refund.

Who Else is Skipped?

Beyond Medicare Advantage enrollees, the $90 rebate program also excludes several other groups:
• Low-income seniors: Anyone whose Part B premiums are already covered by Medicaid or state assistance programs.

Current Medicare Adva
 

Huey » Yesterday, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:24 pm

Nope. You can't be this dumb.

AI Overview

President Donald Trump has repeatedly promised $2,000 "tariff dividend" checks (and later expanded up to $5,000 pledges) funded by import tariff revenues, though no $2,000 checks have been approved or distributed.

I told you to go away. You are really looking pretty dumb right now, granny.

Trump promises different checks

Huey » Yesterday, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:07 pm

As long as you bitched about it when Biden was Prez I am good with it.

Also, we are still waiting on his other checks.  That tell you anything?  You may go away now.  Don't go away mad, just go the **** away.

What made you think I would be okay with it?

I am looking forward to being able to fly to the grocery store

https://youtu.be/WOypE0DHeJc?is=oQ8_J2HR81GBqsJZ

Zeets2 » Yesterday, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:18 am

Shows how ignorant you are, asshole!
I'd be DELIGHTED to take a $5000 gift from ANY Democrat who wants to give me one, and I know that there are millions of American voters who are far worse off economically than I am!  Personally, I'd probably donate some of that $5000 to the presidential campaign of JD Vance in 2028!  And it wouldn't matter that I still would vote Republican, because I know that in my deep blue state of NJ, a Republican wouldn't stand a chance anyway.

Only a complete moron like yourself who has spent weeks whining about the high price of gas would not enthusiastically take Trump's $5000 offer.  Even a liberal can't be that dumb!  But it will mostly help solidify the Republicans running for Congress who are in states where the race is within a few points, and that should be sufficient for Republicans to hold the majority.

Now tell me, asshole.  You think independent voters struggling with bills to pay won't be influenced by the offer enough to sway their choice when they go vote?  How many minorities in solid blue cities won't think twice about dumping their Democrat reps (after seeing how corrupt they are anyway) overboard to grab that gift, especially after also seeing the damage that Biden's millions of illegals have done to their city and state?  Think they're all blind to what's going on in France, the UK, and Germany who have opened their borders to illegals and hoards of Muslim radicals and are fearful of letting Democrats open our border once again?

Thankfully, not all voters are as dumb as you! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paq6sVkkEg0
 

jerrab » 21 Oct 2026, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2026, 2:10 pm

This is about the billions for farmers who are in a crunch because of his policies and mistakes

-------------------------
Republicans locked in tight races this November are desperately hoping the Trump administration’s last-minute gambit to send farmers $8 billion in taxpayer money will work.

No. ****, you're dead *** WRONG as always!!

Farm Bill Deadlocks: Senate Democrats on the Senate Agriculture Committee opposed and blocked a Republican-led Farm Bill proposal over disagreements regarding changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), including proposed state-level cost-sharing mandates and work requirements, rather than direct opposition to farmer support. Democratic lawmakers and groups like the League of Conservation Voters argued the bill also included cuts to conservation and sustainability programs.


YOUR SIDE, **** that hates farmers!!

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 8:09 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:24 pm

Nope. You can't be this dumb.

AI Overview

President Donald Trump has repeatedly promised $2,000 "tariff dividend" checks (and later expanded up to $5,000 pledges) funded by import tariff revenues, though no $2,000 checks have been approved or distributed.

I told you to go away. You are really looking pretty dumb right now, granny.

Trump promises different checks

 

No ****.  That's real genius there, alright. 
 

jerra » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 8:10 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:07 pm

As long as you bitched about it when Biden was Prez I am good with it.

Also, we are still waiting on his other checks.  That tell you anything?  You may go away now.  Don't go away mad, just go the **** away.

What made you think I would be okay with it?

 

Because you have yet to criticize Biden's checks.

*Roshambo » 22 Oct 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

22 Oct 2026, 7:18 am

Lay off the bath salts.

you repeating the wife, verbatim?

*Roshambo » 22 Oct 2026, 4:28 am » wrote: ↑

22 Oct 2026, 4:28 am

JuCo,
https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+i ... r+campaign
https://campaignlegal.org/update/campai ... ps-illegal

activist judges…shocking…

who was he promoting? no one specifically, right? Just our Republic…