Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
⭐️ Post of the Day - Nominations ⭐️
⭐️ Post of the Day - Nominations ⭐️
By Annoyed Liberall
18 Jun 2020 7:01 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Jan 2024 7:55 pm
The president has no more allies and is a traitor to the nation, Viktor Medvedchuk has said
pPresident Vladimir Zelensky is doomed to be ousted this year, having antagonized all of his domestic and foreign allies, exiled Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Medvedchuk has said. Zelensky's demise, however, will be good for the Ukrainian people, he added.Medvedchuk was the leader of the Opposition Platform – For Life party, which Zelensky’s government banned for allegedly being “pro-Russian.” He was arrested and forced out of Ukraine in a prisoner exchange with Moscow. The politician has since been promoting a project, which would make his home nation a neutral state, prioritizing national interests, as opposed to being a Russian enemy.In a column published on Wednesday, Medvedchuk blasted the incumbent Ukrainian president, branding him an “unfunny parody of a dictator,” whose weakness sends a signal to all “political predators to eat him.”
“Zelensky has antagonized everyone he could: big businessmen, whom he blacklisted as traitors and oligarchs, professional Nazis, who see his cowardice, the military, who sees his incompetence, and last but not least the people, who see his indifference and cruelty,” he wrote.
Ukraine is in a deep crisis that is bound to lead to a national disaster once Western funding for the proxy war against Russia is reduced, he claimed.Ukrainian citizens need to realize that Zelensky’s downfall “does not necessarily mean a defeat of the Ukrainian people.”Instead, the opposite is true, according to Medvedchuk. It will be a victory for them, since the president “has long betrayed them and is selling them out for cannon fodder.”The column predicted hard times for the US, which Medvedchuk believes has lost its direction, and the EU, which he expects to be sacrificed by Washington to support the American economy. For Ukraine, it means no EU membership, and its citizens should know that “Europeans will have to give their financial goodies to the American elites, not Ukrainian refugees.”
Medvedchuk believes that Russia may serve as an alternative to “impoverishing Europe.” He expects that “the number of Ukrainians in Russia will increase in 2024, benefiting not just them, but everyone.”Russia has become a major destination for Ukrainian nationals, with officials estimating that as many as five million fled eastwards after the hostilities erupted in 2022. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he considers Russians and Ukrainians brotherly peoples. He described as tragic the fact that Kiev’s divisive policies after the 2014 armed coup had led to bloodshed between these peoples.
https://www.rt.com/russia/590401-medved ... -downfall/
1 Nomination
Tempest62 Jan 10, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 10, 2024 4:02pm
pPresident Vladimir Zelensky is doomed to be ousted this year, having antagonized all of his domestic and foreign allies, exiled Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Medvedchuk has said. Zelensky's demise, however, will be good for the Ukrainian people, he added.Medvedchuk was the leader of the Opposition Platform – For Life party, which Zelensky’s government banned for allegedly being “pro-Russian.” He was arrested and forced out of Ukraine in a prisoner exchange with Moscow. The politician has since been promoting a project, which would make his home nation a neutral state, prioritizing national interests, as opposed to being a Russian enemy.In a column published on Wednesday, Medvedchuk blasted the incumbent Ukrainian president, branding him an “unfunny parody of a dictator,” whose weakness sends a signal to all “political predators to eat him.”
“Zelensky has antagonized everyone he could: big businessmen, whom he blacklisted as traitors and oligarchs, professional Nazis, who see his cowardice, the military, who sees his incompetence, and last but not least the people, who see his indifference and cruelty,” he wrote.
Ukraine is in a deep crisis that is bound to lead to a national disaster once Western funding for the proxy war against Russia is reduced, he claimed.Ukrainian citizens need to realize that Zelensky’s downfall “does not necessarily mean a defeat of the Ukrainian people.”Instead, the opposite is true, according to Medvedchuk. It will be a victory for them, since the president “has long betrayed them and is selling them out for cannon fodder.”The column predicted hard times for the US, which Medvedchuk believes has lost its direction, and the EU, which he expects to be sacrificed by Washington to support the American economy. For Ukraine, it means no EU membership, and its citizens should know that “Europeans will have to give their financial goodies to the American elites, not Ukrainian refugees.”
Medvedchuk believes that Russia may serve as an alternative to “impoverishing Europe.” He expects that “the number of Ukrainians in Russia will increase in 2024, benefiting not just them, but everyone.”Russia has become a major destination for Ukrainian nationals, with officials estimating that as many as five million fled eastwards after the hostilities erupted in 2022. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said he considers Russians and Ukrainians brotherly peoples. He described as tragic the fact that Kiev’s divisive policies after the 2014 armed coup had led to bloodshed between these peoples.
https://www.rt.com/russia/590401-medved ... -downfall/
1 Nomination
Tempest62 Jan 10, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 10, 2024 4:02pm
11 Jan 2024 7:34 am
The Executive Branch Is Deliberately Failing Americans
Laura Hollis | Jan 11, 2024
The president of the United States is the head of the federal government's executive branch. Among that branch's responsibilities is law enforcement; this is why the president takes the oath to "faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States" and "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The Biden administration is failing utterly to perform these responsibilities, and nowhere is this more evident than with immigration.The United States has an extensive body of immigration law that provides criteria for immigration and procedures by which foreign nationals can establish residence or citizenship. It is the constitutional obligation of the executive branch to enforce these laws. President Joe Biden refuses to do so.The predictable result has been a flood of illegal immigrants. More than 300,000 people crossed the southern border illegally this past December, a record high in a year filled with staggeringly high numbers:
November: 242,418
October: 240,988
September: 269,735
August: 232,972
July: 183,503
June: 144,607
May: 204,561
April: 211,401
March: 191,900
February: 212,266
January: 156,274
Nearly 2.5 million people entered the U.S. illegally just in 2023. (Note that these numbers do not include anyone crossing the border without interacting with Border Patrol officials.) More than 10 million people have crossed the border illegally since Biden took office; that number is larger than the individual populations of 41 of the 50 states.
The costs to Americans are enormous and growing.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform published a comprehensive report last year showing that federal, state, and local expenditures for illegal immigration are approaching $200 billion annually.
But dollar figures don't capture the real costs to everyday Americans. We do not have sufficient affordable housing for our own citizens. Veterans and the elderly have been forced out of housing to make way for illegal immigrants. Our own homeless population is exploding, many of whom need treatment for addiction and/or mental illness. In Chicago, migrants have been living in the O'Hare airport. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey has asked citizens to take migrants into their homes. Just this week, a New York City high school was closed, and its students were sent home for "remote" learning so that nearly 2,000 migrants could be housed at the school during a winter storm.
Illegal immigrants also distort congressional representation. They are counted in the decennial census population tallies, so their presence increases congressional representation for states with more of them. That reduces the voting power of citizens in states with lower populations.
Open borders facilitate human trafficking, including child sex trafficking. In 2022 alone, the Department of Homeland Security lost track of 85,000 unaccompanied children it had placed with "sponsors." A departmental whistleblower testified before Congress last spring, warning that "...[T]he U.S. Government has become the middleman in a large scale, multibillion-dollar, child trafficking operation run by bad actors seeking to profit off the lives of children." Illegal drug importation is contributing to record numbers of fatal drug overdoses in the U.S.
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 10, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 11, 2024 6:30am
Laura Hollis | Jan 11, 2024
The president of the United States is the head of the federal government's executive branch. Among that branch's responsibilities is law enforcement; this is why the president takes the oath to "faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States" and "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The Biden administration is failing utterly to perform these responsibilities, and nowhere is this more evident than with immigration.The United States has an extensive body of immigration law that provides criteria for immigration and procedures by which foreign nationals can establish residence or citizenship. It is the constitutional obligation of the executive branch to enforce these laws. President Joe Biden refuses to do so.The predictable result has been a flood of illegal immigrants. More than 300,000 people crossed the southern border illegally this past December, a record high in a year filled with staggeringly high numbers:
November: 242,418
October: 240,988
September: 269,735
August: 232,972
July: 183,503
June: 144,607
May: 204,561
April: 211,401
March: 191,900
February: 212,266
January: 156,274
Nearly 2.5 million people entered the U.S. illegally just in 2023. (Note that these numbers do not include anyone crossing the border without interacting with Border Patrol officials.) More than 10 million people have crossed the border illegally since Biden took office; that number is larger than the individual populations of 41 of the 50 states.
The costs to Americans are enormous and growing.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform published a comprehensive report last year showing that federal, state, and local expenditures for illegal immigration are approaching $200 billion annually.
But dollar figures don't capture the real costs to everyday Americans. We do not have sufficient affordable housing for our own citizens. Veterans and the elderly have been forced out of housing to make way for illegal immigrants. Our own homeless population is exploding, many of whom need treatment for addiction and/or mental illness. In Chicago, migrants have been living in the O'Hare airport. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey has asked citizens to take migrants into their homes. Just this week, a New York City high school was closed, and its students were sent home for "remote" learning so that nearly 2,000 migrants could be housed at the school during a winter storm.
Illegal immigrants also distort congressional representation. They are counted in the decennial census population tallies, so their presence increases congressional representation for states with more of them. That reduces the voting power of citizens in states with lower populations.
Open borders facilitate human trafficking, including child sex trafficking. In 2022 alone, the Department of Homeland Security lost track of 85,000 unaccompanied children it had placed with "sponsors." A departmental whistleblower testified before Congress last spring, warning that "...[T]he U.S. Government has become the middleman in a large scale, multibillion-dollar, child trafficking operation run by bad actors seeking to profit off the lives of children." Illegal drug importation is contributing to record numbers of fatal drug overdoses in the U.S.
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 10, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 11, 2024 6:30am
13 Jan 2024 8:09 pm
@actionjackson
The fact is, pig pharma and their vassals in what was once your government are actively suppressing a covid cure because its patent is expired. They were doing the same thing with Ebola, until the government of Sierra Leone published the cure to Ebola on the front page of their newspaper of record, immediately ending the RAMPANT panic inducement from the American media. Ebola was the Failure to end of Failures of the Obama Administration - and then it wasn't. Just ZIP - gone.
Ask yourself why Ebola, which was being very actively politicized and weaponized by the right against Obama, suddenly went from a level ten emergency to E-who? E-what? E-BOLA? Never heard of it.
Did it never occur to you to wonder why a disease so politicized and so publicized just dropped off the face of the earth, mid-house-on-fire? It's because the CURE for Ebola could no longer be kept from the world - the cat was out of the bag. The CDC had THOUGHT they could develop pig pharma's next cash cow in the impoverished, easily-bullied nations along on the Ivory Coast. But when Sierra Leone blew the whistle by publishing the cure, they packed up their goons and went home to plot their next crime against humanity. They failed in Obama's administration. They succeeded in Trump's - and very easily duped the Orange Menace into clearing the regulatory path for them.
I remember when the left was SKEPTICAL of corporations and government. I remember the left OCCUPYING wall street, instead of shilling for it.
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 13, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 13, 2024 6:01pm
The fact is, pig pharma and their vassals in what was once your government are actively suppressing a covid cure because its patent is expired. They were doing the same thing with Ebola, until the government of Sierra Leone published the cure to Ebola on the front page of their newspaper of record, immediately ending the RAMPANT panic inducement from the American media. Ebola was the Failure to end of Failures of the Obama Administration - and then it wasn't. Just ZIP - gone.
Ask yourself why Ebola, which was being very actively politicized and weaponized by the right against Obama, suddenly went from a level ten emergency to E-who? E-what? E-BOLA? Never heard of it.
Did it never occur to you to wonder why a disease so politicized and so publicized just dropped off the face of the earth, mid-house-on-fire? It's because the CURE for Ebola could no longer be kept from the world - the cat was out of the bag. The CDC had THOUGHT they could develop pig pharma's next cash cow in the impoverished, easily-bullied nations along on the Ivory Coast. But when Sierra Leone blew the whistle by publishing the cure, they packed up their goons and went home to plot their next crime against humanity. They failed in Obama's administration. They succeeded in Trump's - and very easily duped the Orange Menace into clearing the regulatory path for them.
I remember when the left was SKEPTICAL of corporations and government. I remember the left OCCUPYING wall street, instead of shilling for it.
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 13, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 13, 2024 6:01pm
16 Jan 2024 7:16 am
Here are the morons, MORON!!!
Trump’s Iowa win caused the panel on MSNBC to implode, especially Rachel Maddow, who took an academic approach to how this win symbolizes the United States’ push toward authoritarianism. She would know that the extreme right is ascending because she’s studied it.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1747085612799471677
Stupid, liberal bitch!!!
https://twitter.com/i/status/1747115366336082408
https://twitter.com/i/status/1747063305665957938
*** whore
Please remind me, Rachel, whose side is working to remove candidates of the opposing party from ballots. Which side weaponized the Department of Justice to prosecute the political rivals of the Democratic Party? And the Republicans are going fascist because they voted for Trump in a primary. Courts did push back against Trump during his presidency. There were also legions of civil servants who leaked classified information to the press to hamstring his presidency. These aren’t the makings of an authoritarian government.
Alas, that’s the narrative embraced by the Left: if we lose, it’s because of racism or fascism. If we lose, democracy is at risk of being destroyed. It can never be, ‘We lost because we outright suck.’
Trump's Historic Iowa Win Causes MSNBC Host to Completely Implode (townhall.com)
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jan 15, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 16, 2024 6:06am
17 Jan 2024 8:47 am
R.Suave » 17 Jan 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑
How does Bias explain the presence of classified docs at Mar a Lago?
Bias explains that the so-called documents he had would never have been deemed "classified" by a law enforcement agency after Trump declassified all of those documents. Instead, an UNBIASED law enforcement agency, if they had real concerns about the documents, would have first gone to the courts to have it determined whether or not they are really classified, and whether or not Trump can be compelled to turn them over.
Or why Grifty obstructed justice by hiding documents under subpoena...
Because, the subpoena could be invalid. This has been proven during the Russian Collusion investigations where the FBI obtained subpoenas from the FISA court which were later determined to be fraud. Again, another reason to have the retention of documents fully decided by the court BEFORE the FBI takes any enforcement action. Because they didn't do that, it shows bias on the part of the DOJ and FBI.
Crow is not Chicken - - now eat up, chump!!Or why Grifty shared classified info with anyone willing to talk to him.
No court has reviewed evidence and made this determination. Therefore you are just making this **** up.
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 16, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 17, 2024 9:20am
18 Jan 2024 1:31 pm
If it helps you ejaculate at night as you whimper “It is too Donald Trump!” before crying your lonely self to sleep, the picture can be Donald Trump.R.Suave » 16 Jan 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑
They lose their collective **** at the sight of Roy Cohn, notorious sodomite, and his bottom.
They'll make up stories about having seen Roy Cohn bio pics which identify Roy's pet sphincter as someone OTHER than Donnie Boy. Then other MAGAts will cite these anonymous fantasists as authoritative....though they will refuse to name them.
Faced with the facts of their TVDaddy's sordid beginnings, MAGAts are overwhelmed by their Issues and lash out at your children, and late parents. Nothing is "out of bounds" when trying to cope with their grief.
But it won't change the historical fact represented by that photo.
Then there are the MAGAts so **** stupid that they have no idea who taught Grifty the 4 things he knows. **** cretins.
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 17, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 18, 2024 7:22am
18 Jan 2024 8:48 pm
Whether a government is socialist, communist, capitalist, or any other ist, is utterly irrelevant to whether that government is looking out for the people or **** their future in the ***.Tempest62 » 18 Jan 2024, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen up ***, I couldn’t care less. They’re the **** CCP and you idolize them.
Ours is **** us right in the *** - with climate fraud, with medical fraud, with gender fraud, with border fraud, and with banking fraud.
And it is making enemies for our great great grandchildren. NO ONE EXCEPT AMERICANS is going to forget Abu Ghraib in the next hundred years. That **** was unforgivable - and I PROMISE you, it is rightly unforgiven.
As humans, we should applaud ANY GOVERNMENT that keeps its armies in its borders and looks out for the interests of its people.
Russia and China are doing that. You may think that Russia invaded Ukraine, but if you look at the map, every inch that Russia is sitting on has voted to be a part of the Motherland. So it might not HAVE BEEN Russia, but it is now.
And let's face it. Putin spent YEARS trying to get Ukraine to play nice - after the U.S. Military Empire pulled of a coup in their previously friendly neighboring country. If Putin had not done what he did, he would have been a traitor to his own people and, frankly, to humanity. Humanity NEEDED Putin to stop the relentless drive of trans-insanity. Humanity NEEDS leaders of countries.
You look at Russia and China as "enemies." They are ONLY ENEMIES BECAUSE YOU SEE THEM AS ENEMIES. Communism is only "bad" to the degree that people suffer because of it. You are instructed that people are suffering horribly under it. But the same people instructing you thus are also instructing you to get vaxed, have nothing and be happy, respect gender gaslighting, let fruitcakes teach your kids fruitcakery, worship the weather, etc, etc, etc.
For that matter, I will wager that it is easier to start a small business in "Communist" China than it is in "Capitalist" America.
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 18, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 18, 2024 7:10pm
19 Jan 2024 9:07 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY_nQKdX8hY&t=200s
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 18, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 19, 2024 8:36am
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 18, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 19, 2024 8:36am
20 Jan 2024 2:50 pm
20 Jan 2024 8:43 pm
As Joe Biden’s political viability implodes, the exasperated Left has yet a new narrative: front-runner Trump and his extremist/semi-fascist/Ultra MAGA 160 million are out for “revenge” and “retribution—and that Trump might well become a “dictator” and “trample” the Constitution. Ok, let’s examine what a supposed dictator Trump might do if he were to be elected this November? 1) Will he hide the fact that in 2024 he attempted to hire a foreign ex-spy to work with Russian sources to create a fake anti-Biden dossier (while sneakily hiding his payments behind three paywalls), seed it with the media, and hatch lies that Biden was a “Putin poodle” and “Russian asset”? 2) Would a Trump president weaponize a vengeful FBI to begin contracting with X and Facebook to suppress stories he feels will hurt MAGA candidates?
Would his FBI alter FISA warrants to go after his leftwing opponents? Would he and his FBI henchmen have leftwing newspapers blacklisted from X? 3) Would Trump’s future Secretary of State round up 51 right-wing ex-CIA “authorities” to swear and lie on the eve of the balloting that the Russians created the Stormy Daniels nondisclosure agreement? 4) Maybe Trump will get his DOJ to go easy on any future accusations of tax fraud on behalf of his sons by weaponizing the IRS. 5) Maybe Trump will dictatorially cancel student loan debt on the eve of the 2026 midterms. Or would he dare by fiat drain the strategic petroleum reserve merely for Republican advantage in the midterms? 6) Maybe a dictator Trump might appoint a special counsel to investigate the entire Biden family.Would his legal counsel consult with local and state Republican prosecutors to coordinate 90 or so more indictments against ex-president Joe Biden? Will he order the FBI to sweep down on one of the Biden residences to hunt for more missing classified files that Biden removed as a senator and vice president? 7) Will he postfacto declare the 2020 riots to be an armed “insurrection” and retroactively start trying, convicting, and jailing the some 14,000 who were arrested and released—on charges of rioting, looting, arson, murder, and assault, in addition to “illegal parading” and conspiracy to burn a federal courthouse, a city police precinct, a historic church? Would dictator Trump keep in preventative detention indefinitely those arrested in 2020 for rioting and violent protest? 8) Maybe dictator Trump will refuse to discuss all medical questions concerning his 78-year age. 9) Will Trump minions in the media and military start talking about rooting out “leftwing rage”, or Antifa and BLM “domestic terrorists” from the military ranks?
1 Nomination
Deezer Shoove Jan 20, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 20, 2024 9:27am
Would his FBI alter FISA warrants to go after his leftwing opponents? Would he and his FBI henchmen have leftwing newspapers blacklisted from X? 3) Would Trump’s future Secretary of State round up 51 right-wing ex-CIA “authorities” to swear and lie on the eve of the balloting that the Russians created the Stormy Daniels nondisclosure agreement? 4) Maybe Trump will get his DOJ to go easy on any future accusations of tax fraud on behalf of his sons by weaponizing the IRS. 5) Maybe Trump will dictatorially cancel student loan debt on the eve of the 2026 midterms. Or would he dare by fiat drain the strategic petroleum reserve merely for Republican advantage in the midterms? 6) Maybe a dictator Trump might appoint a special counsel to investigate the entire Biden family.Would his legal counsel consult with local and state Republican prosecutors to coordinate 90 or so more indictments against ex-president Joe Biden? Will he order the FBI to sweep down on one of the Biden residences to hunt for more missing classified files that Biden removed as a senator and vice president? 7) Will he postfacto declare the 2020 riots to be an armed “insurrection” and retroactively start trying, convicting, and jailing the some 14,000 who were arrested and released—on charges of rioting, looting, arson, murder, and assault, in addition to “illegal parading” and conspiracy to burn a federal courthouse, a city police precinct, a historic church? Would dictator Trump keep in preventative detention indefinitely those arrested in 2020 for rioting and violent protest? 8) Maybe dictator Trump will refuse to discuss all medical questions concerning his 78-year age. 9) Will Trump minions in the media and military start talking about rooting out “leftwing rage”, or Antifa and BLM “domestic terrorists” from the military ranks?
1 Nomination
Deezer Shoove Jan 20, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 20, 2024 9:27am
20 Jan 2024 8:44 pm
Would Trump order the Pentagon to discharge any soldier who refused to get one of his Operation Warp Speed COVID mRNA boosters? 10) Will dictator Trump protect some 500 “sanctuary cities” from ignoring federal laws—as they nullify the endangered species list or federal gun registrations statutes? 11) Would dictator Trump’s America destroy the southern border deliberately and invite in 10 million illegal aliens from countries he thought would ensure new conservative voters? 12 ) Would dictator Trump’s America start seeing red-states removing the names of Democratic candidates from the ballot? 13) Would dictator Trump start jailing ex-Biden officials who refused Republican congressional subpoenas? 14) Would dictator Trump’s America turn over $50 billion in weapons and supplies to terrorists like the Taliban?
15)Would dictator Trump’s America see an epidemic of big-city lawlessness, as conservative prosecutors deliberately let out felons convicted of smash and grab and car-jacking, and exempted theft and shoplifting from punishment? 16) Would dictator Trump start shaking down foreign governments to send $30 million into the Trump family coffers? 17) Would dictator Trump camp out at Mar-a-Lago for 3-4 days a week, and turn the presidency into a pastime job? So what exactly would a “dictator” Trump do that our “civil libertarian” Joe Biden already has not done? – Victor Davis Hanson
@jerra b
@R. Suave
@Bidencrimefamily
1 Nomination
Plum Hollow Jan 20, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 20, 2024 9:27am
15)Would dictator Trump’s America see an epidemic of big-city lawlessness, as conservative prosecutors deliberately let out felons convicted of smash and grab and car-jacking, and exempted theft and shoplifting from punishment? 16) Would dictator Trump start shaking down foreign governments to send $30 million into the Trump family coffers? 17) Would dictator Trump camp out at Mar-a-Lago for 3-4 days a week, and turn the presidency into a pastime job? So what exactly would a “dictator” Trump do that our “civil libertarian” Joe Biden already has not done? – Victor Davis Hanson
@jerra b
@R. Suave
@Bidencrimefamily
1 Nomination
Plum Hollow Jan 20, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 20, 2024 9:27am
23 Jan 2024 12:30 pm
No...it isn't.R.Suave » 23 Jan 2024, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Legislated science....
Great!
You should consider killing yourself, moron.
Science contains the FACT that the male/female determination is based on the chromosomes of a person. Science contains the FACT that the chromosomal makeup of a person cannot be changed. It is impossible for a male to transition to a female, and vice versa. Why don't you believe in science? (FYI...that is a question directed to you)
No matter how much a person spends on changing their hair style, purchasing makeup, buying clothes, getting the nails done and/or mutilating their body, "Frank" will never really be a "Francis" and "Jennifer" will never really be "Jerry".
There is no requirement that anyone, or any government entity, has to support, promote, endorse, and/or participate in the fantasy life someone chooses to live.
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 22, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 23, 2024 10:53am
24 Jan 2024 7:57 am
- Your Federal Government at Work: They knew – – In-person voting in Nov 2020 wasn’t a health risk – Mail-in Voting was less secure than in-person voting – So, knowing this, they push the heck out of mail voting Why would they do this to Americans? – Rasmussen
- Department of Homeland Security was aware of the mass mail-in voting risks ahead of the 2020 election but censored online criticism of the policy anyway, documents obtained through a lawsuit by America First Legal reveal. – Leading Report
- DHS warned of integrity of mail-in voting in 2020 election but at the same time censored questions – Just The News
1. Implementation of mail-in voting infrastructure and processes within a compressed timeline may also introduce new risk.”
2. “For mail-in voting, some of the risk under the control of election officials during in-person voting shifts to outside entities, such as ballot printers, mail processing facilities, and the United States Postal Service.”
3 “Integrity attacks on voter registration data and systems represent a comparatively higher risk in a mail-in voting environment when compared to an in-person voting environment.”
4. “The outbound and inbound processing of mail-in ballots introduces additional infrastructure and technology, increasing potential scalability of cyber attacks.”
5. “Inbound mail-in ballot processes and tabulation take longer than in-person processing, causing tabulation of results to occur more slowly and resulting in more ballots to tabulate following election night.”
6. “Disinformation risk to mail-in voting infrastructure and processes is similar to that of in-person voting while utilizing different content. Threat actors may leverage limited understanding regarding mail-in voting processes to mislead and confuse the public.” – America First Legal
continued at....
https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2024 ... all-along/
1 Nomination
FJB Jan 23, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 24, 2024 8:42am
24 Jan 2024 8:49 am
This is you....in a nutshell.....R.Suave » 24 Jan 2024, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ At one point, he claimed, as he has repeatedly in the past, that “they used Covid to cheat.” At another point, he claimed that in addition to winning in 2016, “we also won in 2020 – by more. And we did much better in 2020 than we did in 2016.” He dismissively said, “But as they said, we lost by a whisker.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/23/politics ... index.html
Anyone requiring further commentary is a moron.
@Vegas ?
America’s Elites are a Dangerous Fringe Group
The Commentary Magazine Podcast discussed an article in The Wall Street Journal by Kim Strassel (behind a paywall). She lists the findings of a poll done by the founder of Rasmussen. He interviewed “the elites”: Those who make over $150,000 per year, have a post-graduate degree, and live in a high density area. He listed them as 1% of the population. Some identified as Democrats, some Republicans, and some independents. But their views were remarkably homogeneous:
74% say their finances are getting better (compared to 20% of other voters).
Their Approval ratings:
Biden: 84%
University professors: 89%
Journalists: 79%
Lawyers: 78%
Union leaders: 78%
Members of Congress: 67%
2/3 say teachers, not parents, should determine what children are taught. Nearly 50% say USA has too much individual freedom. 77% support strict rationing of gasoline, meat, and electricity to fight climate change. These are incredible numbers. So 84% of these “elites” approve of the job Biden is doing?
Holy ****! It’s no wonder these people don’t understand, well, nearly everybody else in America. It’s like they’re living on another **** planet. Which, I suppose, they sort of are. They’re getting wealthier. They like where they are, and they fear change. Leftism’s centralized control systems stifle change. Which is great, if you don’t want change.
Capitalism is unpredictable. If we’re allowed to compete, you never know who might win. And if you’re winning, the last thing you want is open competition. So they say Americans have too much freedom, and we should ration food and energy to the masses. The successful become risk-averse, and naturally tend to support the establishment which maintains the status quo.
Makes sense, I guess. But this is also a window into the dark corners of the human soul. I got mine. So screw the rest of you. If you get rich, and then you want to prevent others from becoming rich, that says a lot about you. And it’s not good.
The elites are a powerful group, and they are much more politically active than everyone else. And their views don’t sound like hippy-dippy college kids. These are people that consider themselves our betters.
1 Nomination
GHETTO BLASTER Jan 23, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 24, 2024 5:32am
24 Jan 2024 11:04 am
LOL
- Trump is out there campaigning; Biden can't do that.
- Trump is telling Americans how he will fix America's problems; Biden can't do that.
- Trump has energy; Biden is a dead fish
- Trump is in charge of his campaign; Biden gets lead around by Jill and the Easter Bunny
- Trump is focused on the Border Problem; Biden can't even travel to the border.
- Trump talks about out-of-control inflation; Biden mumbles on and on about Bidenomics
- Trump provides details to us about our international enemies; Biden can't even remember the names of foreign dignitaries he personally meets with.
- Trump has direction; Biden looks lost.
- Trump walks with authority; Biden stumbles up stairs
- Trump has been president of this country; Biden's Administration tries to be president because Biden is incapable of doing so.
- Trump has run many businesses; Biden has never run a business.
- Trump conducts himself ethically and honorably; Biden takes bribes from Ukraine, Russia, Iran, Pakistan and China.
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 23, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 24, 2024 10:07am
25 Jan 2024 6:40 pm
It seems that an alarming number of people seem to think we actually dwell in a democracy...their vote matters...and the apparent coordination that happens among the elite and the top down enforcement of it is merely an 'emergent phenomenon'.
for people who believe such stuff...i just have a few questions:
1) when 3+journalists write the same nonsense story about ukraine on the same day (say ghost of kiev, snake island, etc)...and it is a story later admitted to be false...how can that not be coordinated?...and how can it not expose an intent to deceive from whoever the conductor is? isnt that similar to seeing musicians in a symphony playing beethoven's 5th and assuming that everything they are doing is random and only appears to be coordinated? Someone must have written that music and someone is conducting.
2) WHen alex jones is banned on the same day...in the same hour...by 5+ social media platforms...(but the ONLY gentile owner, jack dorsey, seems to hesitate but give in shortly after...i think it is an important pattern to notice that he was literally the only social media owner who was not jewish (and he was removed shortly after by a jew...https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/elliot- ... -says.html who replaced jack with the current CEO) ...how is that not coordinated from the top down? how can that be organic?
3) When the elites panic over elon musk potentially owning twitter...is it because he isnt 'random' because they are? or is it because he isnt one of them?
4) when an NGO writes a white paper that then becomes legal policy a few months later...is that random? Did the NGO actually persuade politicians that their way is best?
5) why is holocaust education mandatory in the USA but not Iran? Could it be because of the ethnic differences between the elite in Iran vs the elite in the USA?
6) in 1924 (when a racially exclusive immigration policy was passed) the vast majority of US elites where anglo protestants. By 1965 (year of hart cellar) many of those elites had been replaced by immigrant populations especially catholics and jews. Is that random, or was there a power struggle? a struggle indeed that the anglos explicitly attempted to resist (henry ford, madison grant, etc)...the general population was still in 1965 quite 'racist' and opposed to non white immigration in 1965, which is easy to confirm with polls from the day (84% were opposed to non white immigration)...but hart cellar passed anyway...
7) Why is it that corporations comply with woke culture? woke culture is ostensibly anti corporate. indeed if corporations refuse to comply, they can be sued out of existence...it is illegal to not comply.
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jan 25, 2024
Go to original post on Jun 08, 2022 8:31pm
for people who believe such stuff...i just have a few questions:
1) when 3+journalists write the same nonsense story about ukraine on the same day (say ghost of kiev, snake island, etc)...and it is a story later admitted to be false...how can that not be coordinated?...and how can it not expose an intent to deceive from whoever the conductor is? isnt that similar to seeing musicians in a symphony playing beethoven's 5th and assuming that everything they are doing is random and only appears to be coordinated? Someone must have written that music and someone is conducting.
2) WHen alex jones is banned on the same day...in the same hour...by 5+ social media platforms...(but the ONLY gentile owner, jack dorsey, seems to hesitate but give in shortly after...i think it is an important pattern to notice that he was literally the only social media owner who was not jewish (and he was removed shortly after by a jew...https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/elliot- ... -says.html who replaced jack with the current CEO) ...how is that not coordinated from the top down? how can that be organic?
3) When the elites panic over elon musk potentially owning twitter...is it because he isnt 'random' because they are? or is it because he isnt one of them?
4) when an NGO writes a white paper that then becomes legal policy a few months later...is that random? Did the NGO actually persuade politicians that their way is best?
5) why is holocaust education mandatory in the USA but not Iran? Could it be because of the ethnic differences between the elite in Iran vs the elite in the USA?
6) in 1924 (when a racially exclusive immigration policy was passed) the vast majority of US elites where anglo protestants. By 1965 (year of hart cellar) many of those elites had been replaced by immigrant populations especially catholics and jews. Is that random, or was there a power struggle? a struggle indeed that the anglos explicitly attempted to resist (henry ford, madison grant, etc)...the general population was still in 1965 quite 'racist' and opposed to non white immigration in 1965, which is easy to confirm with polls from the day (84% were opposed to non white immigration)...but hart cellar passed anyway...
7) Why is it that corporations comply with woke culture? woke culture is ostensibly anti corporate. indeed if corporations refuse to comply, they can be sued out of existence...it is illegal to not comply.
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jan 25, 2024
Go to original post on Jun 08, 2022 8:31pm
25 Jan 2024 6:52 pm
[quote="FOS" post_id=2050219 time=1654745488 user_id=2840]
It seems that an alarming number of people seem to think we actually dwell in a democracy...their vote matters...and the apparent coordination that happens among the elite and the top down enforcement of it is merely an 'emergent phenomenon'.
for people who believe such stuff...i just have a few questions:
1) when 3+journalists write the same nonsense story about ukraine on the same day (say ghost of kiev, snake island, etc)...and it is a story later admitted to be false...how can that not be coordinated?...and how can it not expose an intent to deceive from whoever the conductor is? isnt that similar to seeing musicians in a symphony playing beethoven's 5th and assuming that everything they are doing is random and only appears to be coordinated? Someone must have written that music and someone is conducting.
2) WHen alex jones is banned on the same day...in the same hour...by 5+ social media platforms...(but the ONLY gentile owner, jack dorsey, seems to hesitate but give in shortly after...i think it is an important pattern to notice that he was literally the only social media owner who was not jewish (and he was removed shortly after by a jew...https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/elliot-managements-paul-singer-seeks-to-replace-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-source-says.html who replaced jack with the current CEO) ...how is that not coodrinated from the top down? how can that be organic?
3) When the elites panic over elon musk potentially owning twitter...is it because he isnt 'random' because they are? or is it because he isnt one of them?
4) when an NGO writes a white paper that then becomes legal policy a few months later...is that random? Did the NGO actually persuade politicians that their way is best?
5) why is holocaust education mandatory in the USA but not Iran? Could it be because of the ethnic differences between the elite in Iran vs the elite in the USA?
6) in 1924 (when a racially exclusive immigration policy was passed) the vast majority of US elites where anglo protestants. By 1965 (year of hart cellar) many of those elites had been replaced by immigrant populations especially catholics and jews. Is that random, or was there a power struggle? a struggle indeed that the anglos explicitly attempted to resist (henry ford, madison grant, etc)...the general population was still in 1965 quite 'racist' and opposed to non white immigration in 1965, which is easy to confirm with polls from the day (84% were opposed to non white immigration)...but hart cellar passed anyway...
7) Why is it that corporations comply with woke culture? woke culture is ostensibly anti corporate. indeed if corporations refuse to comply, they can be sued out of existence...it is illegal to not comply.[/quote]
How about the most damning evidence of them all...over the past 40-60 years, all of a sudden Western, primarily white countries opened up their borders and let in millions (tens of millions in the USA) of non-white foreigners?
Just as an aside:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way, conjob RETARDS, I'm not talking about illegal immigration, I'm talking about[b] LEGAL immigration[/b]. There was no popular demand for massive increases in the levels of LEGAL immigration - the illegal immigration problem today is a subset of the whole "program" and if you're just focused on "illegal Mexican invaders" you're missing the point since the entire goal is to [b]de-racinate[/b] white America.
[b]Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! [/b]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that this is all going on across N. America & Europe is almost [i]prima facie[/i] evidence that the operation was [[[WELL COORDINATED]]] and ideated EONS ago.
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=905]Herman Two Feather[/url] [size=85]Jan 25, 2024[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2476761#p2476761]Go to original post on Jan 25, 2024 1:40am[/url]
It seems that an alarming number of people seem to think we actually dwell in a democracy...their vote matters...and the apparent coordination that happens among the elite and the top down enforcement of it is merely an 'emergent phenomenon'.
for people who believe such stuff...i just have a few questions:
1) when 3+journalists write the same nonsense story about ukraine on the same day (say ghost of kiev, snake island, etc)...and it is a story later admitted to be false...how can that not be coordinated?...and how can it not expose an intent to deceive from whoever the conductor is? isnt that similar to seeing musicians in a symphony playing beethoven's 5th and assuming that everything they are doing is random and only appears to be coordinated? Someone must have written that music and someone is conducting.
2) WHen alex jones is banned on the same day...in the same hour...by 5+ social media platforms...(but the ONLY gentile owner, jack dorsey, seems to hesitate but give in shortly after...i think it is an important pattern to notice that he was literally the only social media owner who was not jewish (and he was removed shortly after by a jew...https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/elliot-managements-paul-singer-seeks-to-replace-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-source-says.html who replaced jack with the current CEO) ...how is that not coodrinated from the top down? how can that be organic?
3) When the elites panic over elon musk potentially owning twitter...is it because he isnt 'random' because they are? or is it because he isnt one of them?
4) when an NGO writes a white paper that then becomes legal policy a few months later...is that random? Did the NGO actually persuade politicians that their way is best?
5) why is holocaust education mandatory in the USA but not Iran? Could it be because of the ethnic differences between the elite in Iran vs the elite in the USA?
6) in 1924 (when a racially exclusive immigration policy was passed) the vast majority of US elites where anglo protestants. By 1965 (year of hart cellar) many of those elites had been replaced by immigrant populations especially catholics and jews. Is that random, or was there a power struggle? a struggle indeed that the anglos explicitly attempted to resist (henry ford, madison grant, etc)...the general population was still in 1965 quite 'racist' and opposed to non white immigration in 1965, which is easy to confirm with polls from the day (84% were opposed to non white immigration)...but hart cellar passed anyway...
7) Why is it that corporations comply with woke culture? woke culture is ostensibly anti corporate. indeed if corporations refuse to comply, they can be sued out of existence...it is illegal to not comply.[/quote]
How about the most damning evidence of them all...over the past 40-60 years, all of a sudden Western, primarily white countries opened up their borders and let in millions (tens of millions in the USA) of non-white foreigners?
Just as an aside:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way, conjob RETARDS, I'm not talking about illegal immigration, I'm talking about[b] LEGAL immigration[/b]. There was no popular demand for massive increases in the levels of LEGAL immigration - the illegal immigration problem today is a subset of the whole "program" and if you're just focused on "illegal Mexican invaders" you're missing the point since the entire goal is to [b]de-racinate[/b] white America.
[b]Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! [/b]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that this is all going on across N. America & Europe is almost [i]prima facie[/i] evidence that the operation was [[[WELL COORDINATED]]] and ideated EONS ago.
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=905]Herman Two Feather[/url] [size=85]Jan 25, 2024[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2476761#p2476761]Go to original post on Jan 25, 2024 1:40am[/url]
27 Jan 2024 7:15 pm
The notion that they are EITHER "pretending," OR they are "born that way," is predicated on no particular argument that I have seen you make. You just blithely make that assumption, with no backing. You have shown no genetic component.Vegas » 27 Jan 2024, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly. I don't know why the hell anyone would want to pretend that they are gay. Who the hell does that? Maybe it's for the attention because they will be different. I don't know.
The pretense that gays are taking the path of most resistance is likewise shoddy. I can absolutely promise you that being straight in San Francisco is the path of greater resistance, compared to being gay. And my experience is 25 years old - I seriously doubt it is less true today. No genetic component - just a social one.
But leave SF out of it - its an outlier (less and less and less as time goes on, but an outlier). Let's just talk about resistance. The assumption that the only resistance gay people face or straight people face is being associated with the taboo - the less and less and less taboo as time goes on, mind you - is likewise predicated on assumptions only: no argument I have seen you make. The fact is, the inability to score ****** is an enormous resistance to remaining hetero. People need sexual intimacy. In an atomized and dysfunctional late capitalist society, many young men are incapable of attracting a girl - and are thereby rendered accessible to homosexual advances. No genetic component.
For that matter, if an adolescent male is offered a hand job by anyone even SLIGHTLY adroit, he's **** taking it. Any pervy uncle can get his hand on the cock of a young boy who doesn't have male protection and direction. And now, that boy associates men and sex - for the rest of his life. No genetic component.
You are arguing for a genetic component, but none of your arguments point to one. They just perambulate about, kicking over a logical fallacy here and an undefended assumption there. You have voiced an opinion - not an argument. And you know what they say about opinions:
Yours is incorrect.
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 27, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 27, 2024 5:52pm
28 Jan 2024 8:00 am
As I said, the doxing post was deleted. The post I responded to was merely the first post I found of hers.ROG62 » 27 Jan 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ what in the post you replied to invoked doxing? Or was it a different post?
I do not moderate much. I started this thing for a place to post - not for a **** part time job.
But I will not tolerate doxing behaviors. I absolutely won't - and I will go you one farther. I say that anyone sufficiently worked up to put a bunch of energy into doxing another poster is a low blood. The kind of person who will snoop through your **** if they get a chance. I find it **** creepy.
I guarantee you that I've had enough breadcrumbs to dox multiple posters, if I were so inclined. I would rather lose a limb than be that inwardly deformed.
This is an anonymous board. That's the deal. It's a contract between people who create screen names here and post. I won't have this turn into dot org, where management refused to protect posters from psychopaths who wanted to track them down in real life. I cannot PREVENT that behavior - but I damned sure will not tolerate it. Ever.
1 Nomination
ROG62 Jan 27, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 27, 2024 7:02pm
28 Jan 2024 6:45 pm
So let's try to understand this logic.Bidencrimefamily » 28 Jan 2024, 12:25 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.businessinsider.com/economy ... eni-2024-1
Ed Yardeni, a veteran market strategist, thinks the US economy might be about to relive the "Roaring '20s."The Yardeni Research president said during Friday's episode of Bloomberg's "Merryn Talks Money" podcast that he's expecting a combination of loose post-pandemic monetary policy and rapid technological change to drive growth higher over the next decade.
The current inflation rate is up .3% to 3.4% this month, and the current fixed mortgage rate went up from 7.17% to 7.23%.
And the average personal loan interest rate is 11.56%.
The average rate on a 30-year mortgage rose to 6.69% last week, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday. A year ago, the rate averaged 6.13%.
The average price of food in the United States increased 2.7% in the 12 months.
Food prices are expected to rise another 2.9% in 2024.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets ... r-AA1kOkAT
Postal rates increasing by 2 cents this year.
Crude oil prices expected to increase throughout 2024. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=57160
And despite all this, you're gullible enough to STILL think that Biden's economic policies are working, huh?
One question:
When will you begin to use the tiny brain you were overly blessed with having?
1 Nomination
Majik Jan 28, 2024
Go to original post on Jan 28, 2024 11:23am
Who is online
In total there are 2853 users online :: 18 registered, 15 bots, and 2820 guests
Registered users: Skans, Jantje_Smit, Deezer Shoove, murdock, RebelGator, FJB, Blackvegetable, *Beekeeper, *Huey, Buck Naked, Mrkelly, Buffalo, Johnny You, Punch, roadkill, 31st Arrival, Fuelman, ROG62
Bots: DuckDuckGo, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, proximic, semantic-visions.com, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, linkfluence.com, bingbot, Googlebot, GPTBot