Liberal Forum

RollingRock » 03 Jul 2020, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2020, 9:45 pm

You'll see some familiar usernames as well as some posters who don't post at .org.  I like this place much better.  The other place is a right wing trollfest now.

It's way more then a troll fest. RR. It's an outlet for neo nazis. You know it as well as I. I saw this coming. You and I don't always agree, but I believe we do agree on this.

---

1 Nomination

Older Guy Jul 02, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 03, 2020 8:04pm

DennisTheMenace » 04 Jul 2020, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jul 2020, 10:38 am

This is great news. She' s been exposed to Donald Sr I'm sure.

Will Donald Sr start wearing a mask and set an example

Hope this clears that up!


 
 
 

---

1 Nomination

supraTruth Jul 03, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 04, 2020 9:01am

Although I don't tune into the "news" (if you can call it that) much, I skimmed a headline today about how Trump's niece, Mary, wrote a book documenting Trump's flawed personality traits, family history, and misdeeds.

Unsurprisingly, the low and average IQ crowd will swallow this story up like a toddler would with cotton candy.

I do not care about Trump in general, only acknowledging the fact that his primary purpose of being in office is to enrich himself both in terms of net worth and notoriety. Like a normal person, I have very few thoughts on "Trump" or "Biden" or whichever puppet sits/will sit in the WH.

They are a "gnat on an elephant's ***" in terms of importance (as a certain person on this forum likes to say).


But then some odd idea came into my head - what if Trump's niece planned this out in advance with Trump himself?

The deal is simple:

1) Mary writes a book, likely filled with fictitious events and conversations. Bombastic language and coruscating recollections are to be expected.
2) Mary gets royalties from book sales.
3) Mary and DJT split profits - DJT plays his part and acts "incensed" or "disdainful" in public (on Twitter and television) to fool the average and low IQ crowd (85% of America).

And why not? They both profit from this endeavor, and as long as Mary and her other family members keep their mouths shut, nobody will know.

Kind of like how nobody except Fox Insiders knew O'Reilly and Hannity actually hated each other (back when O'Reilly still had his show on FN, they saw each other as competitors and hated each other for "stealing each other's viewers").

And that brings me to theory numero deux...
 

---

1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Jul 05, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 02, 2020 4:43pm

omh » 07 Jul 2020, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2020, 12:04 pm

wow, your mind is so controlled by others you cannot use your brain to see the separation between a civil war and an international one. You claim to be smarter than those you oppose?

As soon as the shooting started in the civil war, there is no practical distinction.  The United States Army had an enemy in 1861.... it was the CSA Army.  The United States Army had an enemy in 1941... it was the Axis Alliance of Germany, Japan, and Italy.  In war.... victory is the objective. Violence is the means to that objective.  The rebels of the south were every bit enemies of the United States as the Japanese pilots on December 7th, 1941. 

---

1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Jul 07, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 07, 2020 2:33pm

A classic liberal?
What's that? Probably means I'm not.

A classical liberal?
What l/Libertarians call themselves? Nope. I'll pass on the Ayn Rand deification and the property is more important than people nonsense.

A real liberal? A true liberal? An actual liberal?
Is that like a real, true, actual Scotsman? I'm probably not. My ancestors were Welsh, French, British, German, Russian, etc and most of Eastern Europe (Jewish, though I'm not Jewish). No Scots. Basically they traveled a bit had a lot of sex. Horny bastards.

I have a mix of liberal, progressive and some conservative ideas & beliefs. Folks here probably consider me far, far, far to the left. Because most cannot think their way out of a wet paper bag. Clem, for instance.

All 4 of the repugnant positions presented have a similar mix of issues which get complex pretty quickly. Free speech vs consent vs criminality vs control. Individual to individual to society to state.

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I believe you wanted the free speech discussion on those 4 issues. Since you did not set limits, I won't indulge you on that speculation. I'm not going to write a book. I'll give each one more than one sentence.

Let's have a guiding principle: Nelson Mandela — 'A Nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but it's lowest ones'. Not a totally original thought. You can find similar voiced by others throughout history.

1. NAMBLA?
They get to say what they say and decent people get to say why they are freaks poisonous to society and dangerous to children. Free speech for both sides. That they put a target on their own backs so law enforcement can keep an eye on them is great, IMO.

The right to say vile things exists. That right is not absolute and does not obligate me to offer them a stage or microphone or my attention or my debate. It also does not extend to actions. It's when they move from words to actions that they need to be caught, tried, convicted and jailed.

I am against the way the death penalty has been misused in this country. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" has been shown to fail too often. I would argue someone who has been convicted of molesting or raping a child "beyond any doubt" should be taken out behind the chemical shed to get a bullet in their head, to steal imagery from V for Vendetta.

They have given up their right to exist with the rest of us. They don't get to destroy children's lives.

2. The wearing of Burkas?
If someone wants to wear a Burka wear one. If someone does not want to wear a Burka, don't wear one.

Problems occur because you have two small groups within larger groups, Muslim and Muslim-hating, that both use the issue as an attempt of control by codifying laws for and against.

There are extreme Muslims who want to make it more than a religious obligation for all Muslim women. Many want all women, Muslim or not, to wear Burka's whether they want to or not. I don't agree they get to make the call for any women. Not their body. They don't like it and in cases they have killed women who argue against them or refuse to wear one.

There are extreme Muslim-haters that wish to deny agency to any women who would choose to wear a Burka and prevent her from doing so for many imaginative reasons. It's a three-fer. They get to **** on Muslim's and **** on women while gas-lighting they are champions of women.

Both group of ****-wits need to be placed in a large room, armed with knives and then the doors get welded shut. Everyone else walks away.

3. Prayer instead of medical attention for your child?
You get to be as anti-vax, pray the disease away as you want. Up until the point you are harming your child. Children are not property. They are a responsibility.

Once, again, speech vs action. Once your actions harm, you are up on charges. Rightfully so. With any luck the state will catch you beforehand and get the kid healthcare. That happens. Not often enough.

You get to have your religion & religious speech. You don't get to kill your kids in the practice of your religion.

There is a recent story where parents killed their kid by exposing her to Covid-19 at church even though she was immuno-suppressed. She died days after her 17th birthday. The parents were healthcare workers. Their political speech in favor of Trump led them to kill their own child through negligence.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/flo ... 47609.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... r-BB16ssMt
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/el ... urch-event
https://www.wftv.com/news/trending/teen ... OHOCII3AQ/

4. Virtual kiddy porn?
There are different ideas on this subject in different parts of the world. USA vs Japan has a huge abyss of difference of opinion. You won't find many American men reading Teen Rape Comic books on the subway on the way to and from work.

IANAL.

You can probably make all the cartoons porn you want. Once you move beyond cartoons, your mileage can take you to prison.

Based on the news I've read about the US, if you create a comic based on an actual child, that is considered kiddie porn and you go to jail. This is slightly different from the first example, but no less disgusting IMO.

Your freedom of speech does not mean you get to make computer generated pornography depicting someone else's real child having sex with adults even if it is in the form of a cartoon. In writing this I realize the deep fake technology exists right now which probably makes it possible to make quite disgusting porn like this, and probably already has been done. So much more than very disturbing.

You get caught doing this crap, go to jail, do not pass GO, do not collect $200. Seems fair to me. If you took it out of the virtual world into the real world, trip behind the chemical shed for you.

Your "right" to speech that turns you on does not extend to images of my or anyone else's kid.

That's it.

One persons rights vs another persons vs society as a whole vs the state. You'd think this would be simpler. Well, maybe not you or me, but Clem would.
 
 

---

1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Jul 08, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 08, 2020 4:38pm

Tucker Carlson is a moron.

Most on the left love this country.  He's just being a divisive douchebag.

---

1 Nomination

DennisTheMenace Jul 09, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 09, 2020 4:45am

Brand mascots are just anthropomorphized ideas/values.  White culture has had plenty of good models of virtue, for example the Quaker guy on the oatmeal.  Quakers were virtuous, chaste, industrious and honed their cabinets with stunning craftsmanship.  They were very white.

Another example: the Pirate dude on the Captain Morgan’s Rum bottle.  He is a swashbuckling, dashing, jaunty rakish daredevil.  He symbolizes certain traits and qualities, like freedom and rebellion with the one leg up pose





So, ideally, an advertiser would create a visually appealing logo using a mascot, and the mascot has always been some archetype of a positive quality that the customer wants to be associated with, hence the consumer buys the product.

So why have blacks not been represented in advertising except in a very few, unflattering cases? Because blacks have never embodied the quality traits in the American psyche. The stereotype has been lazy, ignorant, shifty, we have ascribed these traits to black people to justify their enslavement and it takes generations, nay centuries to change such associations.

During the 1970s and 1980s, blacks started to finally become associated with two positive traits in the collective white imagination, fun and “cool”. This was due to their heavy presence/ influence in music and athletics. Black music was so good in the 1940s, Elvis Presley culturally appropriated it and got super rich. As did Eminem decades later.

Now in 2020, we finally have the first black advertising icon that is NOT based on some old tired cliche about slaves mammies and house ***. A pro athlete, symbolizing physical strength, speed and the champions will to win! Shaquille O Neil, the new face of Papa Johns pizza! Cuz he bought many franchise investments, they now have his likeness on the pizza boxes.


 

---

1 Nomination

Phelix_Dacat Jul 09, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 09, 2020 8:43pm

Cannonpointer » 09 Jul 2020, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2020, 5:25 pm

Kudos to an absentee author of this thread - the fellow whom you all know as big sky. He co-authored this thread, and originated the thesis.

A conflation of absurdity based in hyperbole steeped in clownish stupidity.

Which would take two absurd hyperbolic clowns to come up with. 

---

1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Jul 08, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 09, 2020 3:47pm

Cannonpointer » 10 Jul 2020, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2020, 3:18 pm

supraTruth » 10 Jul 2020, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2020, 3:16 pm

Florida is having the biggest spike in COVID-19 DEATHS & there weren't protestors there.  Only LOUD MOUTH BAR HOPPERS!

Florida had a lot of *** crybabies in the street, I'll wager.
What are there - 19 million people in florida?
And you said how many died, again? What was the number?
Can you tell me how many have died from lightning strikes or flea bites?

Are those two things contagious?

 
 
 

---

1 Nomination

supraTruth Jul 09, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 10, 2020 1:37pm

Misty » 10 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm

Are those two things contagious?

---

1 Nomination

supraTruth Jul 09, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 10, 2020 1:37pm

Both are, yes. You can catch them just from walking out your door.

https://newrepublic.com/article/158471/ ... an-history

Trump's commutation of Roger Stone's sentence confirms his place atop a pantheon of ignominy.

The United States is in the grip of a pandemic that already has killed more than 130,000 Americans; tens of thousands more will likely die in the months ahead. The U.S. economy is in free fall while businesses collapse and jobs vanish. We are now virtual pariahs on the international stage, locked out of Canada and the European Union over the federal government’s failure to contain the coronavirus. And President Trump does not seem to care. 

On Friday night, he instead turned his attention to more urgent matters by commuting the prison sentence of Roger Stone, a longtime Republican political adviser and Trump aide. A federal jury convicted Stone last year of lying to Congress during the Russia investigation and threatening another witness who could contradict him. In Trumpworld, this makes him a hero. “Roger Stone has already suffered greatly,” the White House said in a statement. “He was treated very unfairly, as were many others in this case. Roger Stone is now a free man!”

Trump’s decision to wipe away Stone’s three-year, four-month prison sentence is purportedly about the Russia investigation, the prosecutors who led it, and their supposed mistreatment of Stone. But it is really about the president himself. Organized-crime syndicates rely on a simple but potent act of fealty: If you protect the boss, the boss will eventually protect you. So does the Trump administration. By commuting Stone’s sentence, Trump has ably protected himself—and cemented his status as the most corrupt president in the nation’s history.

The facts of Stone’s case are largely indisputable. In the spring of 2016, Russian intelligence operatives carried out cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. They absconded with troves of internal emails and documents—some mundane, some embarrassing. Those materials made their way to WikiLeaks, which had a history of publishing sensitive information about the U.S. government. By April, Stone had told Trump campaign officials that he was in contact with WikiLeaks about the material. Rick Gates, a top Trump campaign aide, later testified that he heard Stone tell Trump by phone in July 2016 that a damaging WikiLeaks release was imminent.

Shortly before the Democratic National Convention in late July, WikiLeaks published thousands of internal DNC emails, some of which show top Democratic officials favoring Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders during the primaries. DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned on the eve of the convention, amid bad blood between the two camps. Over the next few months, Stone publicly and privately bragged that he was in contact with WikiLeaks and that more dirt would be coming. His predictions reached a fever pitch in October, shortly before WikiLeaks released Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s stolen emails as well. Stone’s antics drew intense scrutiny after the election, as investigators probed links between the Trump campaign and Russian meddling. Congressional investigators questioned Stone at length about his direct interactions with WikiLeaks as well as communications through an intermediary. Stone chose to lie multiple times to the House Intelligence Committee about what had happened. He also threatened witnesses who could contradict his version of events. When radio host and former WikiLeaks intermediary Randy Credico said he would release information about what had happened, Stone bombarded him with angry, graphic messages. “I am so ready,” read one of his emails. “Let’s get it on. Prepare to die cock sucker.”Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office charged Stone last year on seven counts, including making false statements to Congress and witness tampering. Stone did not conduct himself well at trial: Judge Amy Berman Jackson imposed a gag order on him after he posted an image of Jackson’s face next to crosshairs on Instagram. A D.C. jury found him guilty in November. Federal prosecutors initially recommended a sentence of seven to nine years in prison. Then Attorney General Bill Barr and the Justice Department’s upper ranks intervened on Stone’s behalf, withdrawing that recommendation and submitting a far more lenient one in its place.“What I heard—repeatedly—was that Roger Stone was being treated differently from any other defendant because of his relationship to the president,” Aaron Zelinsky, one of the federal prosecutors who quit the case in protest, told Congress last month. “I was told that the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Timothy Shea, was receiving heavy pressure from the highest levels of the Department of Justice to cut Stone a break, and that the U.S. Attorney’s sentencing instructions to us were based on political considerations. I was also told that the acting U.S. Attorney was giving Stone such unprecedentedly favorable treatment because he was ‘afraid of the president.’”If the Justice Department showed the same care and concern for the defendants’ wellbeing in every case it pursued, it could defend its special circumstances for Stone. If the attorney general’s office showed the same zeal in opposing lengthy sentences for every defendant it prosecuted, it could justify its intervention in this case. If Trump was willing to free federal prisoners convicted of non-violent crimes who weren’t his friends or allies, he could claim a fig leaf of credibility here. Instead, the White House spent the last few weeks threatening protesters with ten-year prison sentences for vandalizing statues. The Trump administration believes in prison abolition for its henchmen and mass incarceration for everyone else. Trump’s commutation of Stone’s sentence was inevitable, in a way; the implicit oath of fealty between boss and underling cuts both ways. In a redacted portion of the Mueller report, the special counsel’s office noted that Trump was less than truthful when answering written questions about Stone from investigators. Mueller’s team said it found evidence that Trump “intended to reinforce Stone’s public statements that he would not cooperate with the government when the president likely understood that Stone could potentially provide evidence that would be adverse to the president.” It went on:

On November 28, 2018, eight days after the President submitted his written answers to the Special Counsel, the President criticized “flipping” and said that Stone was “very brave” for not cooperating with prosecutors. Five days later, on December 3, 2018, the President applauded Stone for having the “guts” not to testify against him. These statements, as well as those complimenting Stone and Manafort while disparaging Michael Cohen once Cohen chose to cooperate, support the inference that the President intended to communicate a message that witnesses could be rewarded for refusing to provide testimony adverse to the President and disparaged if they chose to cooperate.

Most people probably imagine corruption taking place in hushed conversations behind closed doors, where it can only be unearthed by tenacious journalists or well-equipped prosecutors. Trump’s greatest innovation is to simply carry out his corrupt acts in plain sight. Sure, he could have quietly passed along a secret message to Stone or Manafort that promised support if they didn’t turn against him. But why go to the trouble? A few posts on Twitter and a casual remark in a TV interview will accomplish the same goal. Broad daylight also helps obscure the sinister implications. If it was really so bad, the average observer might ask, why would he do it in public?So what is to be done about this? A president’s decision to pardon or commute is final and irrevocable; neither Congress nor the courts can overturn it. And yet Stone’s commutation can only be described as a quintessential abuse of power. The House of Representatives would be fully justified in opening an impeachment inquiry into the move. (A Senate trial may be impossible during a pandemic, however.) If Barr had any sense of honor or integrity, he would resign in protest. If Republican senators who aren’t Mitt Romney had any self-respect, they would condemn the president’s corruption and work to remove him from office.But Americans should not expect any of these people or institutions to hold Trump accountable in any meaningful way. The president cares only about himself and his own survival, and too many people in power care only about satisfying him to achieve their own goals.

 
 

---

1 Nomination

nuckin futz Jul 10, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 11, 2020 7:18pm

KFSW » 13 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm

LIBs have no compass or souls.  Frauds.

10-15 years "Bush, Cheney, Jail!!"

Now....they beat off to the new Neocon SUPER PAC. 

If I found myself at a party attended by actual demons, I'd GET THE **** OUT OF THERE.

But these gender confused nitwits?

They just go from *** dick to neocon dick while ****-grinning, "Tastes great, less filling."
 

---

1 Nomination

KFSW Jul 13, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 13, 2020 3:55pm

Olivaw » 14 Jul 2020, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2020, 1:29 pm

No links required, widdle man. Your evidence free drivel is sufficiently comedic.

On the plus side for me, wm. krystol is not my political bedfellow, useful idiot.

Look on the bright side, jackass. Lush Rimjob hasn't scootched you over. Yet.  

---

1 Nomination

KFSW Jul 14, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 14, 2020 4:20pm

      When most people think of liberals usually a skittles looking *** "social justice warrior" tranny pops up in people's minds. Most people confuse liberals with leftists, which is caused some people to think the association between liberals and leftists is practically the same. FALSE there's is no similarities between caring, fact-checked liberals between whining, "taste-the-rainbow-bitch" leftist snowflakes. The difference: liberals based their optimistic solutions with fact-checked data, evidence and willing to discard old, unnecessary traditions values, and the interest of increasing a person's general knowledge than tactical or professional development. 

Leftists, however, believe the necessities of equality and open hood by means of converts and use of over-exaggeration by any means necessary to critically change the minds of the majority and to also blame the social-economic problems on the minorities(companies, business owners, landlords, etc)  than actually solving the problems through fact n logic and the use of emotions as there driving force to push their leftist agenda.

The role of the SJW is to shut down​​​​​​ peaceful protests (usually In universities) cause the ideas go against their "emotional beliefs" 
A true SJW would rather protect peaceful protests and discourage people whos willing to force a group of people to be shutdown.

Every liberal love a good debate but a leftist wont even bother talking.

 
 

---

1 Nomination

LiberalThugin:) Jul 14, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 14, 2020 8:15pm

https://www.unz.com/ldinh/who-should-be-shot/

Important parts bolded/enlarged.

 Who Should Be Shot?

In a recent article, “Smashing Culture,” I briefly described a scene in Philadelphia from 30+ years ago. Sitting in McGlinchey’s, I was drinking Rolling Rock.This trivia triggered a most curious yet telling response from a commenter, “Rolling Rock? – really? Were you listening to the Eagles too? Nice street cred attempt, but it’s either ‘While knocking back a few beers’ or ‘While drinking a Guinness’ – Rolling Rock just makes you sound like, well, another pretentious art ***.”It never occurred to him I was simply telling the truth. To establish “street cred,” I should have come up with something way cooler.


It’s all about one’s image, you see.

With social media, everyone is a microscopic celebrity, the undisputed global star on his own cellphone, so online preening has become a universal obsession.

Compulsively, they make duck faces while quack quacking bon, not really, mots.

Enjoying such a fabulous virtual life, they miss out on a real one, however, so “street cred” must be established, to mask the fact that they’re never on the streets, even when they’re on the streets. 


Occupy Wall Street erupted in New York on September 17th, 2011. Four days later, I took a Chinatown bus from Philly to see what’s going on, and for the duration of this movement, I kept a pretty close eye on it. Besides the Occupy camps in Manhattan and Philly, I also visited those in Harrisburg, Trenton, Atlantic City, Washington, Raleigh, Savannah and Orlando.Living in tents like urban savages, these protesters suddenly had a tactile and smelly existence inside a community, so despite the cold, rain and absence of indoor plumbing, they were soothed. Night after night, there were no brick walls between their bodies. 



Their movement fizzled out, however, because it degenerated into an endless display of narcissistic posturing, with everyone making self-important speeches about his or her pet cause, to an audience of fifty, tops, which is not how a revolution is ever made.

Had Samuel Adams showed up, he would have had to squeeze his truncated speech in between, say, an animal right manifesto and a black reparation sermon.

     

Still, it was fun to fancy yourself a Mao, Che or Comandante Zero, even if your thundering cosplay was immediately canceled by the next, completely unrelated yet equally forgettable, performance. 


Sitting on a striped blanket, a glum, balding guy went on a hunger strike to protest “UNEMPLOYMENT, POVERTY AND CORPORATE GREED.” Ignored by all, he disappeared after a few days, apparently to stuff his face greedily.

Conceived as not just an indictment but siege of Wall Street, Occupy became a sad, stinking and incoherent skit that increasingly annoyed nearly everyone who had to work, do business or transit around their messy camps.



Though government infiltrators undoubtedly helped to fragment Occupy, most protesters gleefully went along with their own gelding, because, to them, it was never about rallying the 99% towards common goals, as they vaguely claimed, but airing minority grievances.


Most importantly, they could look cool doing it. With visual evidence uploaded onto FaceBook, Tumblr and Instagram, etc., soy boys from strip malled subdivisions could accrue street cred. Since “Occupy Everything, Demand Nothing” became Occupy’s rallying cry, it achieved literally nothing, predictably.


A month after all tents were cleared from Zuccotti Park, Time Magazine anointed “The Protester” as Person Of The Year, so for being symbolically homeless for two months, the sans cazzo got a participation lollipop from the bossman.Since then, unscathed and smirking Wall Street has only amped up its state-of-the-art shell games, punctuated by bailouts. What’s left of the country’s wealth keeps flowing to the top.



Although Occupy Wall Street exposed widespread discontent, it was deftly tamed by the state, without addressing any of the issues raised. Worsened economic malaise is papered over with fake news and statistics. Unable to afford even an efficiency, the young and not so young resignedly or bitterly move back home.



I’m sure you know a few.

Beneath each basement, there’s another, even darker and danker, Americans kept discovering, so they just had to suck it up and simmer on, when not overdosing on opioids. It’s the new normal.Occupy Wall Street protesters were mostly under-35-year-old whites, with at least some college education.




Now, the same demographic is back on the streets, but instead of chanting for economic justice and representing, at least in theory, the 99%, they’re fighting Fascism and racism.


With their inclusive definitions of such sins, however, they’re warring against most of the country.

It’s never been easier to be tagged as a Fascist.


If you don’t think or feel correctly on all woke issues, you’re a Fascist, and of course, you’re a Fascist to the degree that you’re against antifa.

When it comes to sex, binarism is evil, for there’s no male or female, just endlessly calibrated genital transmogrification, if only in your gender fluid, intersexual mind, but with politics, binary thinking is uber kosher. If you’re not up-to-date woke, you’re a Fascist.



On August 14th, 2018, CNN reeducated us, “There is no national antifa group. It is mostly made up of people who are far left of center, who make it their mission to battle Fascists, racists and alt right extremists.” It’s a grassroot, homegrown resistance to hate, that’s all. “Behind the masks are people from all walks of life, artist, mom, ordinary American, as well as anarchist.” Four most gentle faces were shown.

On June 16th, 2020, CNN reemphasized that antifa was a belief system that unified all anti-Fascists, whatever their color, age or background, so how could you be against it, unless you’re a Fascist?! A burly, genial black man explained, “It basically means that you are against Fascism. If you are against Fascism, then you are antifa.”


In a BLACK LIVES MATTER muscle-T, a white wuss added, “Antifa is not a group. It’s not like everybody sits in, like, some basement, talking about how to overthrow the Fascist regime. I walked around picking up trash yesterday, behind the protesters. That’s what antifa looks like.”Burly black guy, “White people have to be involved in fighting racism, in fighting white supremacy […] But if you are a white ally, remember that you still have to follow the lead of people of color.”The New York Times and Washington Post have also written sympathetically about antifa.


When the corporate media give you a positive spin, it must mean you’re serving the establishment. Mussolini had his Blackshirts, Hitler his Brownshirts and Mao his Red Guards. America’s rulers have antifa.



Far from threatening the 1%, antifa sows dissension among the 99%. Ignoring Wall Street, antifa trashes one Main Street after another.

Zealously branding its enemies as racist or Fascist, antifa generates more racism and Fascism.


Slammed by the economic crisis of 2008, Americans started to look more closely at Wall Street, Goldman Sachs and the Federal Reserve, etc., and they were enlightened by people like Ron Paul and Matt Taibbi.In Rolling Stone, Taibbi wrote, “The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”

Banksters were scrutinized with increasing intensity. It was in this climate that Occupy Wall Street was born.Not quite nine years later, almost no one is talking about banksters, incredibly, although the country has been plunged into a much worse economic hell, with millions suddenly laid off, and millions of mom and pops permanently ruined.



Thanks to another monster bailout, only Wall Street is doing well.

Broke and enraged, mobs swarm American streets, but instead of targeting those who are imploding their society, they pull down statues, break windows, deface walls, loot stores and attack cops or each other.

When your tyrants can’t even be identified, much less found, no coup, uprising or revolution is possible, and it’s pointless to assassinate an American president, since he is but a puppet, so who should be shot?



The month I was born, two presidents were killed. Though Ngo Dinh Diem has often been caricatured as an American puppet, he obviously broke his strings, or he wouldn’t have been shot. Kennedy, too, went off script. His death was a warning. It works.



American elections are cathartic farces.


Drawn out and elaborately staged, they’re designed to give false hopes and stoke emotions. With the national mood already so volatile and foul, however, this year’s balloting promises to be a horror show. Unable to aim at their oppressors, Americans will be reduced to shooting each other.

 

---

1 Nomination

KFSW Jul 15, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 15, 2020 12:13am

KFSW » 16 Jul 2020, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2020, 12:08 pm

Total retahds.

These are the people that marched for '''''''BUSH/CHENEY WAR CRIMINALS - JAIL NOW!!'''''

Now the war criminals are all behind WAR BIDEN.  And the left-tards are praising them.

They truly are to stupid to get it...its embarrassing.

Before you came over, they were attacking trump FROM THE RIGHT for "exceeding his authority" when he issued the first directive to leave Syria. The MIC continues to disobey, which is itself a coup. Trump has been removed from power already, quite publicly - but he still stops the war machine from going any farther. Biden's job is to correct that - and the useful idiots' job is to get Biden into office, like good little stooges.

According to the polls, they will fail. I say that because the polls say they will succeed - and I know how those tea leaves work.

---

1 Nomination

KFSW Jul 16, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 16, 2020 12:17pm

Isabel » 08 May 2020, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 May 2020, 7:19 pm

Instantly bleating: "Ha ha it's cold this proves that global climate change is a HOAX!!" most certainly is.

If mindlessly shouting your idiot talking points on cue like a trained poodle embarrasses you so such, you should go beg your masters for new ones.

Then let's talk science. Here are ten facts:

1. Only by foreshortening the history of the earth to the last 600,000 years, as al gore did in his film, can the case be made that atmospheric carbon levels are anything but historically low.

2. When plants evolved photosynthesis, atmospheric carbon levels were in the thousands of parts per million - not the hundreds. Plants today live in a carbon starved environment, by evolutionary standards.

3. For most of the earth's history, atmospheric carbon has been above 1000ppm. Every plant on earth does better in a carbon enriched environment, and virtually all greenhouse or hothouse grown vegetables are grown in a carbon enriched environment.

4. If every major city in America invested a thousand bucks per person on carbon enriched greenhouses, the carbon saved from no longer trucking veggies to market and the carbon sequestered by the crops in the enriched environments would more than address carbon emissions, without creating any global trading boards to allow the privileged few (gore and his cronies on both sides of the pretend aisle) to "speculate" (take a cut) on the very air we breathe.

5. OSHA allows 1000ppm of atmospheric carbon in conference rooms at work.

6. Rupert Murdoch, owner of fox news, is perceived as being against climate change. In truth, he owns 150 OTHER media outlets which are all global warming, all the time. His enterprise at fox is only STALLING, while the principles squabble about their seats at the table and their cut of the pie. Once those issues are sorted, fox will be instructed to "grudgingly" admit they were "wrong" about climate change - and endorse a carbon trading board. Indeed, republicans were originally tasked with introducing the idea of carbon trading, under Poppi Bush.

7. Sea levels don't rise exclusively in the third world, as we are being instructed - the oceans are not racist.

8. You do not know what the optimum temperature of the earth is. No one does. We might be getting closer to it, or farther from it - no one can say.

9. You do not know what the optimum atmospheric carbon level is. No one does. All life on earth dies if it dips under 200, and declines as it nears that number. It is virtually certain that levels are lower than optimal, given that there are no known species of plants which are not currently operating at below optimal carbon levels.

10. The lowest carbon levels recorded in earth's history - in the 200s - coincide with ice ages (which are extinction events).

---

1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Jul 17, 2020

Go to original post on May 11, 2020 3:57am

KFSW » 15 Jul 2020, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2020, 6:29 pm

Whats yer go to move in bed?

Tell ya mine - holler for a guard.

---

1 Nomination

KFSW Jul 17, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 17, 2020 1:38am

This is just another attempt by THE PIG to deflect from his failures. It's a campaign stunt to escalate an already heated protest. In effect he has skirted the Posse Comitatus Act by not using military troops, but instead using the justice dept. goons. This wasn't a plan thought up by THE PIG, he's not smart enough. This was Barr's and THE PIG's campaign minions. If the American people can't see through this ruse, I really don't think there is much hope for our republic unless we vote this bastard out along with all his people. You have the power. Vote like our democracy depends on it. We fought a war, and many people died to end the rule of a king. I'm not asking you to die. Please vote.

---

1 Nomination

Misty Jul 17, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 17, 2020 10:31pm

Endgame
June 25, 2020  

---

1 Nomination

supraTruth Jul 18, 2020

Go to original post on Jul 19, 2020 10:31am