⭐️ Post of the Day - Nominations ⭐️

1 9 10 11 12 13 61
User avatar
Cannonpointer
30 Dec 2020 2:21 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,390 posts
Isabel » 30 Dec 2020, 1:06 am » wrote: I know you are just an ethically bankrupt, groveling whore to your masters, but your sneering dismissal of A THIRD OF A MILLION PEOPLE DYING is beyond repulsive, even for you.

Leaving aside your debunked numbers claim, let's address this matter of ethical bankruptcy.

Remember, it is you who introduced the topic of "ethical bankruptcy."

You were born female, and you probably have some female attributes, still - however grotesque those attributes may have become due to multiple abortions and drunken sexual orgies in the negro quarter.

Yet you have remained curiously quiet in the matter of YOUR PARTY insisting that the doors of women's showers and sports and even their batter-victim shelters be opened to men of any stripe, on the sole condition that those men claim to "feel" female - on the inside.

Given that a Ted Bundy type predator could misuse such a rule to gain easier access to prey; and given that men have a well-established advantage over women in physical strength, power, speed and dexterity; and given that men are more than TWENTY TIMES likelier to sexually assault women than other women are;  WHY HAVE YOU NOT SPOKEN OUT AGAINST YOUR PARTY'S AGENDA?

Again - you brought up ethics. :)

Let the dahncing and ducking begin... now.

 



1 Nomination

Vegas Dec 29, 2020

Go to original post on Dec 30, 2020 2:40am
User avatar
Vegas
30 Dec 2020 8:30 pm
User avatar
Giant Slayer
17,482 posts
solon » 28 Dec 2020, 2:18 pm » wrote:  How much more do I have to dumb it down for you. POVERTY is where violent crime is concentrated and because of DECADES of institutional racism blacks are overrepresented IN the nieghborhoods OF dire poverty so OF COURSE their numbers are overrepreanted in violent crimes which happen IN those places.  This is very obvious and easy to see

White people in poverty don't nearly have the same white on white crime rate, or fathers bailing. They have it, but  proportionately, it's not even comparable. Same with Mexicans and Asians.



1 Nomination

Dr. Sliptinschit Dec 30, 2020

Go to original post on Dec 28, 2020 1:23pm
User avatar
FOS
31 Dec 2020 10:27 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
The way social media corporations and some countries (like germany, for example) define hate speech is just anything that might make a non white person feel sad.

To not commit hate speech, therefore, you would often be required to lie



1 Nomination

Dr. Sliptinschit Dec 31, 2020

Go to original post on Dec 31, 2020 10:10pm
User avatar
Deezer Shoove
6 Jan 2021 11:04 pm
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
9,450 posts
After months of burning cities,
you progs have to really push those double standards of yours to the limit.

It was a peaceful occupation of a couple rooms. No fires.



1 Nomination

Dr. Sliptinschit Jan 06, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 06, 2021 10:54pm
User avatar
Cannonpointer
7 Jan 2021 8:55 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,390 posts
Misty » 07 Jan 2021, 9:44 pm » wrote: The story this thread is based on was so false that even the Mooney Times wouldn't keep it up 
They have removed it.
When there was violence on the left, you assured us it was a false flag. 

When there was violence on the right, you assured us it was not. 

I assure you, you lack credibility on the topic. 
 



1 Nomination

Dr. Sliptinschit Jan 07, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 07, 2021 8:47pm
User avatar
SJConspirator
10 Jan 2021 7:39 am
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
It just took over 200 years for our culture to produce the “quintessentially American” man who could live up to the cult of personality necessary to pull it off.

Growing up, I was keenly aware that the U.S. seemed to be an anomaly in the world.  We had these orderly Transitions of power all my life, while other countries had violent coups, fistfights in the capitols, massive protests in the streets on a regular basis and civil wars.

what made America special, I wondered?  Our Constitution surely has a strong system of checks and balances that seems to prevent major upheavals.  It’s like a structurally sound form of government.  But that doesn’t explain all of it.  Charismatic leaders have risen up before and upended stable systems, drawing sycophants into their orbit and bending entire nations to their will.  What did Stalin, Mussolini, Ghandi, Selassie, and Franco and Tito all have in common?

they all managed to capture the imagination of huge groups of people because they seemed to embody the very spirit and character of a whole nation.  Selassie didn’t just represent a North African nation; he was Ethiopia personified.

America is a young country.  What kind of person really personifies America to the degree that they could form a cult of personality strong enough to seize power?  Bombastic, gluttonous, big businessman, greedy, over the top, larger than life.  

We have never been susceptible to an authoritarian leader subverting the Constitution because we had not made such a unique character, until Trump.



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Jan 09, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 09, 2021 10:18pm
User avatar
Isabel
10 Jan 2021 1:32 pm
User avatar
   
715 posts
Olivaw » 10 Jan 2021, 2:23 pm » wrote: Nothing in those links is an attempted coup or assault on the constitution. 

After Trump’s attempted coup,  it does not fall on the left to take the high ground. Trump and his sycophants would view it as weakness and double down on their insurrection. There is only one way to deal with a bully like Trump and that is to bloody his nose.
Post of the Thread.

Hell, Post of the Week.
 



1 Nomination

Isabel Jan 09, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 10, 2021 3:31pm
User avatar
Cannonpointer
11 Jan 2021 7:21 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,390 posts
Isabel » 10 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm » wrote: Of course I didn't, 
Here we go, loud cow 

This is you, snapbacks intact, doing what you just lied you did not do:

First, you insist that those who disagree with you are traitors, painting with a broad brush people who were not even IN worshington when our brave brothers in arms were falsely arrested for being fully self-expressed:
Isabel » 10 Jan 2021, 1:03 pm » wrote: Everyone knows what violent, murdering terrorists and traitors you are now.
This post ^ does not differentiate between posters on this board and the patriotic great americans who **** in nancy pelosi's chair.

And then you call for mass executions:
Isabel » 09 Jan 2021, 11:54 pm » wrote: It is time to exterminate the repulsive, terrorist, traitorous scourge that is the far right.
Here, you indict the entire "far right" - which includes a number of people who post here, according to a loud cow named skizzy smell. 

Game set and match. Also, checkmate. 

And also infinity, you boozy strumpet - you slack jawed slattern - you scarlet harlot - you loud mouthed shrew - you trailer park tramp - you harridan, you battle ax, you defiled hussy, you intersexed abomination, you peanut butter slut (You'll spread in a Jif), you lipstick whore, you stinkweed of women, you street corner skank, you false-mooing bovine, you beached beluga, you salty-mouthed sea cow, you bellowing ***, you jizz-chinned jezebel, you one-woman suet farm, you greasy-legged street walker, you loud mouthing muslim magnet, you neck-flapped cellulite donor, you hollering horse faced harpy, you practice dummy for mexican rapists, you abortion-happy cum rag, you stark and frightening rebuttal of femininity, you paunchy, drunken guttersnipe, you vile experiment in bloat, you ignorant, misguided slut, you flat-backing floozy, you punch-drunk pudendum pandering pus-bucket, you over-mensing man hater, you yeasty member of the varsity whore squad. 

Fondly,  Cannonpointer. :)



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Jan 11, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 10, 2021 9:46pm
User avatar
Nobody
12 Jan 2021 12:15 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm » wrote:
Misty » 11 Jan 2021, 3:29 pm » wrote: Is that the same Infowars that said the government is using chemicals to turn people and frogs gay?
It isn't an outlet that doesn't have the footage, if that is your query. 
Video footage can be edited or manipulated.
Right wing websites are notorious for that, which is why you often can't find a mainstream source for the stuff they post.
I won't help Infowars by clicking on that ****.
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2021, 3:12 pm » wrote: If anyone can find "legitimate" outlets carrying this film, please post it.
Otherwise, the source we have is the source we have.
Here's a clue.
If you can't find a legitimate news outlet carrying a story or a video, it's probably because the story or the video are not legitimate.
 



1 Nomination

simple jack Jan 11, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 11, 2021 2:38pm
User avatar
Taipan
13 Jan 2021 11:18 am
User avatar
     
4,987 posts
AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Jan 2021, 8:03 am » wrote: I would lay odds that you are on some kind of a watch list somewhere.

Anyone who wishes to disagree with a black person......is a racist and a White supremacist".
All Dems are good.         All GOP are evil.          All GOP must be...........fired..........or at least...."contained".
Welcome to the Democrat Plantation.

What is the motto of the Libertarians--
"We seek to take over the world.......and then leave you alone".

Have a nice day, cowgirl.                                                    
:)  



1 Nomination

Vegas Jan 12, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 13, 2021 9:15am
User avatar
SJConspirator
14 Jan 2021 10:52 am
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
Talk about a guy who had it all.  Super wealthy, a beautiful wife, great family, fame and fortune, freedom, health.. The world was this guys oyster!

Now it looks like the unthinkable could happen.  He could lose his fortune and end up in jail.  But why?

The incredible narcissism.  Demanding constant attention from a whole country is a tall order.  Just from having his twitter account shut down, I heard he is suffering withdrawals like a heroin addict

The lesson.. Your ego is not your amigo.  Learn to fade into the background and let others have the spotlight



1 Nomination

simple jack Jan 13, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 13, 2021 6:07pm
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
14 Jan 2021 2:47 pm
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
Dr.Sliptinschit » 14 Jan 2021, 3:37 pm » wrote: Why is it now, liberals are so concerned about the well being of police officers?

If liberals had beaten the officers you would be cheering.  You liberals are hypocrites.
Fake outrage! human nature! As long as it suits their side. They are all in. Defund the poleece!  Any other time. I am way to honest for that garbage. Cry now, a few police got hurt. Me pukes. Burn down cities.. that's ok.. now a few people go into the capitol.. didn't plant graffiti on anything. break a window... nothing. fake Patriotism at it's best! gotta luv it! :lol:   :lol:   :lol:  



1 Nomination

Dr. Sliptinschit Jan 13, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 14, 2021 2:45pm
User avatar
Neo
15 Jan 2021 7:58 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
DennisTheMenace » 15 Jan 2021, 4:28 am » wrote: Let's ask Jacob Blake, Trayvon Martin, And Micheal Brown about being shot dead by a "cop" as an unarmed person. 

 
Blake was armed. Martin was shot attempting to beat another human being to death while they screamed for their lives. Brown attacked a cop, tried to take his gun, got his thumb blown off, ran away, and then decided to charge the same officer.  Not surprised these are saints and martyrs to progressives. 
 



1 Nomination

Dr. Sliptinschit Jan 14, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 15, 2021 7:52am
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
15 Jan 2021 4:27 pm
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
supraTruth » 15 Jan 2021, 3:04 pm » wrote: Chain smoking Cyndi must always have a cig hanging out of her mouth to feel normal.  Right?
Image
 
  It doesn't matter Supra. At this point? It really doesn't. I plan on doing what ever makes me happy. all your lectures in the world.. wont save me... thanks tho for your concern. :wub:  



1 Nomination

Abatjour Jan 14, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 15, 2021 9:20am
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
16 Jan 2021 11:40 am
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
Abatjour » 16 Jan 2021, 11:34 am » wrote: Watch your mouth! I will not tolerate you taking stealthy stabs at how @bludog  and @RollingRock run the LOL room. Next time, I will report your behavior to @Cannonpointer  !!

  Image
Very funny. :wah:   :wah:   :wah:   :wah:  



1 Nomination

Abatjour Jan 15, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 16, 2021 6:27am
User avatar
Olivaw
17 Jan 2021 11:02 am
User avatar
   
254 posts
Isabel » 16 Jan 2021, 5:40 pm » wrote: They are very well trained and obedient Big Lie Whores.
Whatever lie they are told to chant to serve their pimps, they chant.

It's an easy gig.
No thinking, honor or balls required.
It flies in the face of common sense.
  • Cons frequently brag online about how well armed and well trained they are.
  • Talk of civil war and generic threats against liberals are common in these forums.
  • The Bugaloo Boys, Proud Boys, klansmen and Nazis are always up for a fight.
  • 15,000 MAGATs assaulted Congress.
  • GOP Congress persons want to be armed on the floor of the House. 
Contrast this to the left. 
  • Million women marches drew record breaking crowds to DC without violence. 
  • BLM protests were largely peaceful. Violence was committed by the police and Trump, not the protesters.
  • Eventually the BLM protests did give way to violence. Few of the arrested individuals were BLM. They were right wing terrorists, anarchists and common criminals.
It’s obvious to anyone with a grounding in truth that right wing terrorism is a major problem in this country. It enjoys the supported of many mainstream conservatives and the disgraced 45th president. Left wing terrorism is uncommon. I do not know a single liberals who endorses it.

Attempts by the cult to push the outlandish lie of equivalence or hypocrisy deserves to be laughed out of the room. 
 



3 Nominations

Phelix_Dacat Jan 16, 2021, Coolguy10013 Jan 16, 2021, bludog Jan 16, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 16, 2021 5:47pm
User avatar
Neo
17 Jan 2021 3:57 pm
User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Jan 2021 11:25 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
37,390 posts
THESIS:

"Transgenders" - meaning anyone who claims to identify as female but has the primary sexual characteristics of a male - should be disallowed from showering with, competing against, or otherwise being acknowledged by society as women.

Argument for thesis:

1. Even assuming "real" transgenders are unlikely to sexually offend (I grant no such claim), there is no way of selecting against cis-gender predators, as the definition of transgender is not objective. It is based on reported feelings, which can be fabricated by cis-genders with predatory motives. Men are many times more likely to offend against women sexually than are other women. Some are quite deranged in their need to hurt women. Most sexual predators are male, and most of their victims are women and girls. Allowing men into spaces where women and girls are isolated and vulnerable is a revocation of safety and dignity and privacy rights that women and girls have enjoyed for centuries, and puts women and girls at greater risk of predation.

Moreover, if society passes legislation to protect transgenders from the "discrimination" of other citizens recognizing them by their actual biological sex, it will be a legal offense to even question a man walking into women's facilities - no matter how sketchy (s)he looks. Such laws empower people like Trump and Epstein and Weinstein, by endowing them with a legal right to invade women's spaces - without so much as an obligation to answer questions about their protected (presumed) "disability." Such laws likewise empower frat boys on a dare, and garden variety peeping toms and creeps. No one can prove they don't "feel like a woman - on the inside."

2. On average, men are stronger and quicker and faster than women physically. Second tier male athletes who cannot compete against top tier males are able to beat top tier female athletes due to natural biological advantages. As a result, men are stealing women's university scholarships, and law suits are being filed by some of the victims of these travesties. Meanwhile, the fake women are getting academic scholarships at the expense of the real ones. This sets women back half a century in their fight for equal treatment.

3. Our sports and facilities have throughout our history been SEXUALLY segregated. They still are segregated BY SEX to this day. The argument that one's reported, feelings-based GENDER should change what SEX-segregated facility one accesses or competitions one engages in treats gender as if it were sex.

Liberals: Are gender and sex the same thing? You all keep using them interchangeably, and then chiding us that they are very different things. Pick a position and stick with it. If they are different things, please explain why a mere gender claim should change which sex-segregated facilities or activities one access by legal right.

 
 



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Jan 17, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 17, 2021 7:28pm
User avatar
Abatjour
18 Jan 2021 10:16 am
User avatar
  
74 posts
Jantje_Smit » 18 Jan 2021, 8:31 am » wrote: That's the same delusions...
I have no control over your, mirages, here upon the scorching NHB desert sands.
I disagree, one can do both things at the same time
Nope. Not possible. Come to America, then you will see why that is.

Until then, you are wrong.
But hey, feel free to continue bragging about your support for 2 narcissists' intolerance toward my veracious liberalism in the LO room. And each time you reply, defending them, myself and all readers get more and more evidence of your illogical intolerance toward my opinion.
... you aren't cordial anymore because you don't tolerate my opinion and you can't do both things at the same time
Nope. I am not cordial anymore, for the reason I already listed.

If you want to see cordial, then you have to stop defending 2 narcissists for being intolerant of my veracious liberalism.
If you want to see cordial, you have to respect that you have no rights no privileges no grounds to say I am not a Liberal.
If you want to see cordial, you have to stop your diarrhea-laden tonsils from putting forth the oral argument that I intruded upon 2 narcissists' tyranny over the LO room. 
I am a liberal. Which means that you have to stop blaming, me, because you are too intolerant to accept that I should be allowed to post in there.
  the safe space for uninterrupted liberal thoughts isn't public... you and I aren't allowed in there for example.. so it makes perfect sense to have some narcissistic tyrants making sure it stays safe... nothing hypocritical about that..

Image
Everything is hypocritical about your insane claim here, but that is oooonly because I am a liberal and I fit the posting-criterion as according to what is listed on the LO room Homepage.

You read the Homepage welcoming users and making you into a liar here. Yes, you see how the Homepage does not say that the LO room is exclusive to 2 narcissist mods, and you see how it does not say liberal users will be subjected to tyranny if the narcissists disapprove of your Liberalism, and of course, you see how it does not say that the LO room is a safe space for uninterrupted approved-liberal thoughts. I am a liberal, so the rules say I can post there ---no matter who does NOT appreciate my veracious liberalism.

The End.
 
 



1 Nomination

Abatjour Jan 17, 2021

Go to original post on Jan 18, 2021 5:09am
1 9 10 11 12 13 61

Who is online

In total there are 2703 users online :: 5 registered, 14 bots, and 2684 guests
Bots: CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, BLEXBot, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, linkfluence.com, semantic-visions.com, app.hypefactors.com, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7, GPTBot
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum