He also claimed that his friend ran away and left him to die in a burning car, after the car accident. He said that the guy ran into forest, and he courageously dragged himself to safety. The "friend" said that he pulled him from wreck, and stayed with him until paramedics arrived.DennisTheMenace » 03 Mar 2021, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑
Gregg Abbott. The governor of Tejas. The guy that just ok'd no masks in Tejas. He's no doctor.
He got crushed by a falling oak tree whilst jogging. This type of karma doesn't just fall out of the sky. It's divine intervention.
And then you have Madison (girl's name) Cawthorn. The guy that lied about why he didn't attend the Naval Academy.
Have you seen the story about "fun rides" with Madison?
I'm getting tired of Gophers playing on people's sympathy for the physically and mentally disabled.
The Q-Anon party is the one **** in the head.DeezerShoove » 04 Mar 2021, 12:21 am » wrote: ↑ Man in Dress Party is **** in the head.
They need propaganda to sustain the flock.
Trump partisans are completely emotionally unstable and cognitively challenged. Other conservatives are probably just as stable and intelligent as anybody else, however they have shown themselves to be completely lacking in integrity, so their instability is behavioral.DeezerShoove » 04 Mar 2021, 12:21 am » wrote: ↑ Which set of partisans is more emotionally unstable?
Conservatives or liberals?
That answer will tell you which side is more susceptible to propaganda.
The Ikebanana clown is easily scared.. his feelings are really sensitive... I told him earlier that I thought he was one of RR's approved thoughts disciples.. he claims he doesn't know what I'm talking about.. I can't be bothered to do a search to prove he's lying but maybe you know.. was he one of the liberals cheering for RR's narcissistic and tyrannical attitude to unapproved thoughts?
In my 25+ years in the counselor's chair I believe I helped quite a few couples preserve their salvageable marriages.
Snowflake, who asked ya? Am still laughing at your epic melt down you had when you lied about what I said concerning your issue with CP. you ain’t a man. You’re a dress wearing ******.Pengwin » 04 Mar 2021, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ No, that would be who you are replying to @Dr. Sliptinschit .
Literally good for nothin'...
It's not very difficult to get on insanity disability. People who are just lazy often do that.Polar1ty » 05 Mar 2021, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I excluded the mentally ill/schizophrenic homeless from my assessment.
Like you said, we have a safety net in this country...you can consider the safety net inadequate but nevertheless, there must be some explanation for why these people do not want to get a job. I actually sided with them on this particular issue - if I had to choose between homelessness (living in my car or whatever) and becoming a debt slave, homelessness sounds like the better option.
YOU are, douchebag! One picture of a single facility doesn't change the fact! And EVERY ONE of the headlines I posted ALL SAY that kids are in cages!Pengwin » 09 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll make it very easy for you. Nothing in all of that says kids are in "cages".
And if you had bothered to look up the facility in question you'd discover that it is nothing at all like a bunch of cages.
But you didn't look it up, now did you? You just repeat the right-winger lies...
"CARRIZO SPRINGS, Texas — A former oilfield worker camp off a dirt road in rural Texas has become the U.S. government’s newest holding center for detaining migrant children after they leave Border Patrol stations, where complaints of overcrowding and filthy conditions have sparked a worldwide outcry.
Inside the wire fence that encircles the site are soccer fields, a giant air-conditioned tent that serves as a dining hall, and trailers set up for use as classrooms and as places where children can call their families.
The long trailers once used to house workers in two-bedroom suites have been converted into 12-person dorms, with two pairs of bunk beds in each bedroom and the living room."
https://www.denverpost.com/2019/07/10/n ... -in-texas/
Now who's the horse's ***, Asshole...
Nothing To See Here: Biden Bans Reporters from Viewing His ‘Kids in Cages’
By Ulysses S. Tennyson | Mar 3, 2021
We recently reported on the fantastic non-transparency of the Biden administration. It should come as no surprise, then, that immigration transparency would also decrease as millions of migrants threaten to flood the American border.
After 4 years of accusations against Donald Trump for his detention of illegal alien children in detention centers that were created under Barack Obama, Biden–using the same facilities–has now barred the press from viewing the ‘cages.”
Why?
“The Biden administration will ban reporters from touring juvenile detention facilities now accommodating unaccompanied minors who came across the United States-Mexico border seeking asylum.
“Reporters will not be allowed inside the Carrizo Springs facility for unaccompanied minors that was recently opened under the Trump administration in Texas, a Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families (ACF) spokesperson” said in response to the Daily Caller’s request to tour the facility.”
The reason that they gave will come as no surprise. It is the same reason Democrats have given for all of their tyranny and opacity since last spring:
“The Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) is not hosting media tours of unaccompanied children (UC) facilities currently due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” the spokesperson told the media outlet.
Under President Trump, these facilities were often portrayed as “cages” that imprisoned children. Very often, however, pictures used by the mainstream media often dated to the Obama administration.
After Joe Biden loosened restrictions on the United States-Mexico border, a flood of asylum seekers responded by coming in droves, hoping to take advantage of the Democrat Party’s more lenient immigration policies.
The Washington Post reported that the former Trump “cage” facilities are being “reactivated” to hold up to 700 children ages 13 to 17.”
And I guess a dimwitted **** like you doesn't mind THIS either, do you?Biden Admin Will Not Allow Reporters To Tour Child Migrant Detention Facilities, Cite COVID-19By Emily Zanotti Mar 2, 2021 DailyWire.com
The Biden administration will not allow reporters to tour juvenile detention facilities now housing unaccompanied minors who came across the United States-Mexico border seeking asylum.
“Reporters will not be allowed inside the Carrizo Springs facility for unaccompanied minors that was recently opened under the Biden administration in Texas, a Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families (ACF) spokesperson” said in response to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request to tour the facility.
Such wisdom, while LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZENS can get arrested and tasered for not wearing a mask, Biden border patrol waived in OVER ONE HUNDRED INFECTED ILLEGALS WITH NO PROBLEM!Over 100 COVID-19 Positive Illegal Immigrants Released by Border Patrol in Texas
By Human Events Staff March 3, 2021
There are two main things that team-left is worried about: contracting the coronavirus and finding an easy path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
So, what would their reaction be if illegal immigrants were the ones spreading the virus to American citizens?
Unfortunately for them, it’s happening right now.
More than 100 illegal immigrants released into Texas by Biden’s U.S. Customs and Border Protection tested positive for COVID-19, the Epoch Times reports.
Felipe Romero, a spokesperson for Brownsville, Texas, said that 108 migrants tested positive for the virus since January 5, when rapid testing began. That represents about 6.3 percent of the total undocumented individuals who were rapid-tested at the bus station.
He added that the city has no authority to prohibit COVID-positive migrants from traveling anywhere else in the United States.
So how can even the dumbest liberal justify what determined to be fine for infected illegals BREAKING THE LAW BY ILLEGALLY ENTERING THE COUNTRY, and a man who is bothering no one and NOT infected is arrested and threatened to be tasered WHILE OUTSIDE, WHERE A MASK IS NOT REQUIRED?Texas Cop Threatens To Taser Man For Not Wearing A MaskbyA.M. Smith
— Nicholas Connolly (@MrNickConnolly) January 25, 2021
The cop then tells the man to leave the store, adding, “Don’t argue with me, it’s real simple.”The man, who noted that the officer’s mask had slipped down, is carrying a gun as is his right under Texas law.
The clip shows the officer entering the store and immediately barking at the man, “Where’s your mask at?”
“What mask?” he responds.
“The mask that you’re required to wear by city ordinance,” responds the officer.
The cop then tells the man to leave the store, adding, “Don’t argue with me, it’s real simple.”
.”The man, who noted that the officer’s mask had slipped down, is carrying a gun as is his right under Texas law.
As the man follows the order and leaves the store, the cop then draws his weapon and says, “I will tase you right now!”
Despite the fact that the man has left the store and is no longer required to wear a mask, he is detained anyway and told to put his hands up.
“Get your hand up now!” shouts the officer as he calls for backup. “Dude, you’re just dumb, you should be listening!” he adds.
“You move again, I’m gonna drop you!” says the cop despite the fact that the man is complying.
“It was simple, all you had to do was step outside and put a mask on,” says the officer as he disarms the man’s gun before claiming the man is “uncooperative” despite the fact that he is stood with his hands on his head.
The video ends with the cop pointing the taser at the man.
Some respondents to the video said the man should have complied, but others asserted that the officer took it too far.
“Talk about over reaction by an officer! I’m always for the police but this is ridiculous,” said one.
“But they cannot control the people burning down their cities? Our world is upside down!!” added another.
“Joe Biden’s America right here,” remarked another.
It definitely is. However, I see it this way: If Dems kill the filibuster and push through legislation that 83 million Biden voters want, then we will be in good shape to keep both houses in 2022.Coolguy10013 » 11 Mar 2021, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I want the filibuster to go way also, but this is one of those cases where "be careful what you wish for" comes into play.
billking » 17 Jan 2021, 4:16 am » wrote: ↑ Yes this is good but my God is this what is going to happen everytime a Republican president gets in the white house? A Democrat president has to spend obscene amounts of money to undo the mess? I know this has to happen but how many more times are we going to be able to do this? I thought what Obama did in his first term will get us where we need to be and stable for the future. I fear if we go back down these rabbit holes of disaster anymore times were done I fear this gonna be our last reprieve.
That's it. That is his entire contribution to this thread. It's commensurate with his usual abilities.
No, it's clearly the most dangerous virus ever. That's why we need rolling lockdowns and masks for eternity.
Typically, cuts in federal spending lead to increases in state taxes. President Biden has not cut federal spending; in fact, he has been spending like a Republican so far. I've been watching government a long time, and here's the deal: both parties spend like crazy. Democrats increase taxes (usually on top earners and corporations), Republicans decrease taxes (again, usually mostly in favor of top earners and corporations), but both sides spend. Debt increases when Democrats are in power, debt increases astronomically when Republicans are in power. Debt always increases.Cedar » 19 Mar 2021, 1:09 am » wrote: ↑ The federal government can affect your local taxes with cuts to programs, education was a big one here a few years back. That said I don’t think Biden has been in long enough to **** up your taxes yet, next year should be interesting.
I suspect dictionaries are bad because socialism should be defined by conservatives, who also insist on defining liberalism and civil rights and pretty much everything else they don't like.SJConspirator » 21 Mar 2021, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ what definition should we use for socialism? Dictionary’s are bad?
Again? It's easy to prove you wrong you know, @Abatjour cares about my opinions for one...RollingRock » 22 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody cares about your whining and trollish nonsense.
I’ll just leave this right here.....Cannonpointer » 23 Mar 2021, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I presented no theory, ***. I said it is against the Geneva Conventions to compel someone to accept experimental medical treatments.
That's a fact - not a theory.
I also said the trump vaccines are experimental. Again, that is a fact, not a theory.
Okay, back in the lap, ***. Break's over.