Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
⭐️ Post of the Day - Nominations ⭐️
⭐️ Post of the Day - Nominations ⭐️
By Annoyed Liberall
18 Jun 2020 7:01 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Jun 2022 9:46 am
Republican lawmakers and conservative allies have often
falsely claimed that no weapons were brought to the Capitol to argue the attack was not the violent insurrection that it was.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/17/politics ... index.html
1 Nomination
MAGAdreaming Jun 17, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 17, 2022 8:16pm
falsely claimed that no weapons were brought to the Capitol to argue the attack was not the violent insurrection that it was.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/17/politics ... index.html
1 Nomination
MAGAdreaming Jun 17, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 17, 2022 8:16pm
19 Jun 2022 4:25 am
And that's what makes it suspicious !mrMarduk » 19 Jun 2022, 3:02 am » wrote: ↑ On the other hand, the Ukrainians suffer heavy losses in manpower, which they themselves declare.
They just play the victim's card in order to get support from the weak-hearted of the west for the supply of weapons.
Putin is too kind !
He needs to order a full Iraq-style attack, behead the ruling politicians and their families, disband the Ukrainian army and install a friendly new government !
1 Nomination
walkingstick Jun 18, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 19, 2022 2:18am
19 Jun 2022 10:08 pm
FROM THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO
(Something all modern Americans should read)
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of men who wanted to be left alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love.
They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over.
The moment the men who wanted to be left alone are forced to fight back, it is a form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be. Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these men who wanted to be left alone, fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives.
They fight with raw hate, and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at these people's door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy... but it will fall upon the deaf ears of the men who just wanted to be left alone."
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?
Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!
If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jun 19, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 19, 2022 5:08pm
(Something all modern Americans should read)
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of men who wanted to be left alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love.
They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over.
The moment the men who wanted to be left alone are forced to fight back, it is a form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be. Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these men who wanted to be left alone, fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives.
They fight with raw hate, and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at these people's door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy... but it will fall upon the deaf ears of the men who just wanted to be left alone."
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?
Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!
If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jun 19, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 19, 2022 5:08pm
19 Jun 2022 10:21 pm
I don't feel I'm being "vague" at all.SJConspirator » 19 Jun 2022, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I don’t understand, cuz you are vague.
“the right of self defense” is almost meaningless without more context. Self defense includes the right to kick a guy in the nuts? Shoot him if he is threatening you? Blow up his house? What, exactly?
My best friends dad, when we were growing up had a safe bigger than a gym locker. He kept some awesome firearms in there, including a mac 11 and a fully automatic uzi. The question here is, did the founders intend for the “right to bear arms” have any limitations on what KIND of “arms”, they didn’t specify…
the OP could very well be correct. If the founders did not have any qualms about citizens privately owning weaponry capable of ANY level of destruction, then we should all own nuclear weapons. But we cannot, legally, due to the NPT of which the US is signatory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on ... ar_Weapons
Nor can a civilian legally buy a fighter jet like the F22.
however, we can legally own tanks, guns of any caliber, etc.
Changing technology calls for re-examining old laws from time to time. As far as restrictions of WMD in the hands of civilians, I think we are at a good place right now. Do you?
The right of self-defense is exactly what it says: the right to defend yourself if you are attacked. If we have a right to life then we have the right to defend that life, and by extension the right to possess the most effective means by which to conduct that defense.
The discussion of Nuclear Arms inevitably makes me sigh; because yes, the Constitution does protect "arms". Sadly, we let the government do whatever it wanted to without challenge, when we should have demanded an honest and in depth discussion of the full breadth of the Second Amendment's guarantees once arms became as destructive as some modern ordnance has become.
In a discussion of the Founders, their intent is clearly illustrated in their writings. Jefferson stated that he felt it was "every American's right and duty to be at all times armed." They believed that the people themselves were part of the system of checks and balances, and if it came right down to it the idea that every American had access to access to equivalent armament to the average soldier.
As Tench Coxe so eloquently said:
"Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
You say that "changing technology calls for re-examining old laws from time to time." I say that while you might be right, the Constitution cannot be ignored simply because one finds it inconvenient. If we are to place restrictions upon a right that "shall not be infringed", then a Constitutional Amendment becomes necessary IMHO. Certainly, I don't think nuclear weapons should be in the hands of just anyone; but when it comes to small arms I do truly believe that all citizens do have the right to be armed, including with weapons such as the select-fire M4 that currently arms the majority of our troops.
1 Nomination
Hillary Clinton Jun 19, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 19, 2022 9:47pm
19 Jun 2022 10:21 pm
I don't feel I'm being "vague" at all.SJConspirator » 19 Jun 2022, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I don’t understand, cuz you are vague.
“the right of self defense” is almost meaningless without more context. Self defense includes the right to kick a guy in the nuts? Shoot him if he is threatening you? Blow up his house? What, exactly?
My best friends dad, when we were growing up had a safe bigger than a gym locker. He kept some awesome firearms in there, including a mac 11 and a fully automatic uzi. The question here is, did the founders intend for the “right to bear arms” have any limitations on what KIND of “arms”, they didn’t specify…
the OP could very well be correct. If the founders did not have any qualms about citizens privately owning weaponry capable of ANY level of destruction, then we should all own nuclear weapons. But we cannot, legally, due to the NPT of which the US is signatory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on ... ar_Weapons
Nor can a civilian legally buy a fighter jet like the F22.
however, we can legally own tanks, guns of any caliber, etc.
Changing technology calls for re-examining old laws from time to time. As far as restrictions of WMD in the hands of civilians, I think we are at a good place right now. Do you?
The right of self-defense is exactly what it says: the right to defend yourself if you are attacked. If we have a right to life then we have the right to defend that life, and by extension the right to possess the most effective means by which to conduct that defense.
The discussion of Nuclear Arms inevitably makes me sigh; because yes, the Constitution does protect "arms". Sadly, we let the government do whatever it wanted to without challenge, when we should have demanded an honest and in depth discussion of the full breadth of the Second Amendment's guarantees once arms became as destructive as some modern ordnance has become.
In a discussion of the Founders, their intent is clearly illustrated in their writings. Jefferson stated that he felt it was "every American's right and duty to be at all times armed." They believed that the people themselves were part of the system of checks and balances, and if it came right down to it the idea that every American had access to access to equivalent armament to the average soldier.
As Tench Coxe so eloquently said:
"Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
You say that "changing technology calls for re-examining old laws from time to time." I say that while you might be right, the Constitution cannot be ignored simply because one finds it inconvenient. If we are to place restrictions upon a right that "shall not be infringed", then a Constitutional Amendment becomes necessary IMHO. Certainly, I don't think nuclear weapons should be in the hands of just anyone; but when it comes to small arms I do truly believe that all citizens do have the right to be armed, including with weapons such as the select-fire M4 that currently arms the majority of our troops.
1 Nomination
Hillary Clinton Jun 19, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 19, 2022 9:47pm
20 Jun 2022 12:39 pm
Credible citations?? Dude, if you knew ANYTHING about firearms you'd know what an idiot you sound like.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off with this tripe.
I've heard it already.
**** the Spartan, bring me credible citations.
I've got thirty years of experience as a firearms instructor and law enforcement officer. I've forgotten more about guns than you're ever going to know. Your ignorance is offensive, and you're a **** prick who doesn't know his own asshole from a hole in the ground. If you gun banners had a legitimate argument to make you wouldn't have to lie or resort to incessant false hyperbole to push it.
Go **** yourself with a chainsaw.
1 Nomination
Herman Two Feather Jun 19, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 18, 2022 6:08pm
21 Jun 2022 12:00 pm
[quote="ScottMon" post_id=2060066 time=1655755358 user_id=2054]
If there is a problem with transgenders in bathrooms. we can handle it as it comes up. So far, There isn't much of a track record of transgender people committing rape or sexual assaults in bathrooms.[/quote]
Did it ever cross your tiny brain that the effects of such legislation has caused great hardships to young girls and their parents? Cavalier dopes like you insist that the phony "rights" of a tranny supercede those of females who now feel unsafe using the restrooms and showers where they are exposed to dangers you refuse to believe exist!
[quote][size=150][b]Studies Show Girls Are Now Afraid to Use Restrooms Because of Transgender Problem[/b][/size]
Oct. 15, 2019
The backlash is continuing against the gender-neutral bathrooms transgender activists are demanding. Earlier this month, I noted a story in this month’s edition of The Atlantic, written by a parent who discussed the chaos that resulted when the school decided to eliminate gender designations for student bathrooms — without consulting the parents. This parent — who is very much a liberal — described the profound discomfort of the students, some of whom simply refused to use the bathroom while at school and waited until the school day was over.
According to the Daily Mail, these policies are having a similar impact in the United Kingdom, where gender-neutral bathrooms “have left girls feeling unsafe and even put their health at risk,” according to both teachers and parents. In fact, they reported, the surge in primary and secondary schools implementing gender-neutral bathrooms has made girls “who are menstruating so anxious about sharing facilities with boys that some are staying at home for fear of being made to feel ‘period shame.’” Some are even “risking infections by refusing to urinate all day,” and others are coping by refusing to drink liquids while at school.
This has led to both doctors and politicians calling on schools who are making moves to switch to a gender-neutral bathroom system to stop implementation, with Dr. Tessa Katz saying that “holding in urine for prolonged periods on a regular basis could increase risk of girls suffering urinary and bladder infections.” With teachers and parents stating that girls are feeling “deeply uncomfortable or even unsafe sharing toilets with male students,” halting the shift to gender-neutral bathrooms is necessary “to prevent any further harm to female pupils.”[/quote]
[quote][size=150][b]High school girls afraid to use the bathroom after transgender bathroom policies put in place [/b][/size]
[url=https://thebridgehead.ca/2019/02/27/high-school-girls-afraid-to-use-the-bathroom-after-transgender-bathroom-policies-put-in-place/]FEBRUARY 27, 2019[/url] BY [url=https://thebridgehead.ca/author/jonathon/]JONATHON VAN MAREN[/url][/quote]
[quote][size=150][b]Man who choked girl in women’s restroom stokes alarm over transgender access[/b][/size]
By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Saturday, May 14, 2016
The attack by a man on an 8-year-old girl in a women’s restroom last week in a Chicago restaurant is raising alarm about opposite-sex access to public facilities in the name of transgender rights.
Police say the man, 33-year-old Reese Hartstirn, entered the women’s room May 7 at Jason’s Deli in Chicago’s South Loop and choked the girl until she passed out.
The girl’s mother, who was in the adjacent stall, heard her daughter’s screams and rescued her, while restaurant patrons held the suspect until police arrived, according to WLS-TV in Chicago.[/quote]
So dickhead, now tell me that you've got no problem with your wife or young daughters being forced to use the same showers, locker rooms, or toilets that a tranny is now permitted to occupy. Or don't you have a single female in your family who you would need to worry about thanks to such idiotic liberal laws that your Democrat votes helped give us?
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=841][b][color=#FF6600]Cannonpointer[/color][/b][/url] [size=85]Jun 20, 2022[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2060484#p2060484]Go to original post on Jun 21, 2022 7:24am[/url]
If there is a problem with transgenders in bathrooms. we can handle it as it comes up. So far, There isn't much of a track record of transgender people committing rape or sexual assaults in bathrooms.[/quote]
Did it ever cross your tiny brain that the effects of such legislation has caused great hardships to young girls and their parents? Cavalier dopes like you insist that the phony "rights" of a tranny supercede those of females who now feel unsafe using the restrooms and showers where they are exposed to dangers you refuse to believe exist!
[quote][size=150][b]Studies Show Girls Are Now Afraid to Use Restrooms Because of Transgender Problem[/b][/size]
Oct. 15, 2019
The backlash is continuing against the gender-neutral bathrooms transgender activists are demanding. Earlier this month, I noted a story in this month’s edition of The Atlantic, written by a parent who discussed the chaos that resulted when the school decided to eliminate gender designations for student bathrooms — without consulting the parents. This parent — who is very much a liberal — described the profound discomfort of the students, some of whom simply refused to use the bathroom while at school and waited until the school day was over.
According to the Daily Mail, these policies are having a similar impact in the United Kingdom, where gender-neutral bathrooms “have left girls feeling unsafe and even put their health at risk,” according to both teachers and parents. In fact, they reported, the surge in primary and secondary schools implementing gender-neutral bathrooms has made girls “who are menstruating so anxious about sharing facilities with boys that some are staying at home for fear of being made to feel ‘period shame.’” Some are even “risking infections by refusing to urinate all day,” and others are coping by refusing to drink liquids while at school.
This has led to both doctors and politicians calling on schools who are making moves to switch to a gender-neutral bathroom system to stop implementation, with Dr. Tessa Katz saying that “holding in urine for prolonged periods on a regular basis could increase risk of girls suffering urinary and bladder infections.” With teachers and parents stating that girls are feeling “deeply uncomfortable or even unsafe sharing toilets with male students,” halting the shift to gender-neutral bathrooms is necessary “to prevent any further harm to female pupils.”[/quote]
[quote][size=150][b]High school girls afraid to use the bathroom after transgender bathroom policies put in place [/b][/size]
[url=https://thebridgehead.ca/2019/02/27/high-school-girls-afraid-to-use-the-bathroom-after-transgender-bathroom-policies-put-in-place/]FEBRUARY 27, 2019[/url] BY [url=https://thebridgehead.ca/author/jonathon/]JONATHON VAN MAREN[/url][/quote]
[quote][size=150][b]Man who choked girl in women’s restroom stokes alarm over transgender access[/b][/size]
By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Saturday, May 14, 2016
The attack by a man on an 8-year-old girl in a women’s restroom last week in a Chicago restaurant is raising alarm about opposite-sex access to public facilities in the name of transgender rights.
Police say the man, 33-year-old Reese Hartstirn, entered the women’s room May 7 at Jason’s Deli in Chicago’s South Loop and choked the girl until she passed out.
The girl’s mother, who was in the adjacent stall, heard her daughter’s screams and rescued her, while restaurant patrons held the suspect until police arrived, according to WLS-TV in Chicago.[/quote]
So dickhead, now tell me that you've got no problem with your wife or young daughters being forced to use the same showers, locker rooms, or toilets that a tranny is now permitted to occupy. Or don't you have a single female in your family who you would need to worry about thanks to such idiotic liberal laws that your Democrat votes helped give us?
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=841][b][color=#FF6600]Cannonpointer[/color][/b][/url] [size=85]Jun 20, 2022[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2060484#p2060484]Go to original post on Jun 21, 2022 7:24am[/url]
21 Jun 2022 9:32 pm
History of Solidarity
Gdańsk, 25th anniversary of Solidarity, summer 2005
Solidarity (Polish: „Solidarność”, pronounced [sɔliˈdarnɔɕt͡ɕ] (listen)), a Polish non-governmental trade union, was founded on August 14, 1980, at the Lenin Shipyards (now Gdańsk Shipyards) by Lech Wałęsa and others. In the early 1980s, it became the first independent labor union in a Soviet-bloc country. Solidarity gave rise to a broad, non-violent, anti-Communist social movement that, at its height, claimed some 9.4 million members. It is considered to have contributed greatly to the Fall of Communism.
The People's Republic of Poland attempted to destroy the union by instituting martial law in 1981, followed by several years of political repression but in the end was forced into negotiation. The Roundtable Talks between the Communist government and the Solidarity-led opposition resulted in semi-free elections of 1989. By the end of August 1989, a Solidarity-led coalition government had been formed, and Wałęsa was elected president in December 1990. This was soon followed by the dismantling of the Communist governmental system and by Poland's transformation into a modern democratic state.
Solidarity's early survival represented a break in the hard-line stance of the Communist Polish United Workers' Party (PZPR), and was an unprecedented event; not only for the People's Republic of Poland—a satellite of the Soviet Union ruled by a one-party Communist state—but for the whole of the Eastern Bloc. Solidarity's example led to the spread of anti-Communist ideas and movements throughout the Eastern Bloc, weakening Communist governments.
This process later culminated in the Revolutions of 1989.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Solidarity
Labor unions ended Communism, get over it.
1 Nomination
Hillary Clinton Jun 21, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 21, 2022 3:54pm
Gdańsk, 25th anniversary of Solidarity, summer 2005
Solidarity (Polish: „Solidarność”, pronounced [sɔliˈdarnɔɕt͡ɕ] (listen)), a Polish non-governmental trade union, was founded on August 14, 1980, at the Lenin Shipyards (now Gdańsk Shipyards) by Lech Wałęsa and others. In the early 1980s, it became the first independent labor union in a Soviet-bloc country. Solidarity gave rise to a broad, non-violent, anti-Communist social movement that, at its height, claimed some 9.4 million members. It is considered to have contributed greatly to the Fall of Communism.
The People's Republic of Poland attempted to destroy the union by instituting martial law in 1981, followed by several years of political repression but in the end was forced into negotiation. The Roundtable Talks between the Communist government and the Solidarity-led opposition resulted in semi-free elections of 1989. By the end of August 1989, a Solidarity-led coalition government had been formed, and Wałęsa was elected president in December 1990. This was soon followed by the dismantling of the Communist governmental system and by Poland's transformation into a modern democratic state.
Solidarity's early survival represented a break in the hard-line stance of the Communist Polish United Workers' Party (PZPR), and was an unprecedented event; not only for the People's Republic of Poland—a satellite of the Soviet Union ruled by a one-party Communist state—but for the whole of the Eastern Bloc. Solidarity's example led to the spread of anti-Communist ideas and movements throughout the Eastern Bloc, weakening Communist governments.
This process later culminated in the Revolutions of 1989.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Solidarity
Labor unions ended Communism, get over it.
1 Nomination
Hillary Clinton Jun 21, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 21, 2022 3:54pm
25 Jun 2022 8:08 pm
I'm pro-life in most all circumstances, but in black states which are pro-choice, think of the enormous social services costs, population boom, fatherless families and escalated crime that ensues. Pro-choice should be limited to blacks.
1 Nomination
SJConspirator Jun 25, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 24, 2022 10:13am
1 Nomination
SJConspirator Jun 25, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 24, 2022 10:13am
26 Jun 2022 10:45 pm
27 Jun 2022 1:12 pm
well lets give the kid a shot.. lets WASTE A HEART THEN!Holdor » 27 Jun 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ They do not give liver transplants to people that drink, I agree with the doctor the child should be fully vaccinated for all that he should be at that age, or it is a waste of a heart.
How can the parents have religious concerns over childhood vaccines, but no objection to a Heart Transplant.
and dont worry about the dumb arss covid. Because this is what this is all about.??? ISNT IT?
1 Nomination
jefftec Jun 26, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 27, 2022 1:04pm
27 Jun 2022 10:56 pm
Cause its white.
It is white.
Rural America is largely white.
Same reason they want us to nuke Russia. Russia is white.
it's all about who is white. All of it.
1 Nomination
FOS Jun 27, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 27, 2022 10:52pm
It is white.
Rural America is largely white.
Same reason they want us to nuke Russia. Russia is white.
it's all about who is white. All of it.
1 Nomination
FOS Jun 27, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 27, 2022 10:52pm
30 Jun 2022 11:59 am
SJConspirator » 30 Jun 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Of course the overturning of Roe v Wade had to happen during a Dems term. Can you imagine if they did it during Trumps term, when people were already running amok in the streets? The rioting would have doubled. So they waited.
Like 9/11 happened on Bush watch. If it happened during Clinton or Obama, with the Dems perceived as “soft on terror”, the public would have accused the president or his cabinet of possibly orchestrating the event. But good ol’ Texas boy Dubya.. no way.
The massive bailout of the stock market had to happen under Trump.. if a Dem was in office while the NYSD became more socialist than Norway, the right would have lost their minds. Same with TARP in 2008, it could only happen under Bush.
Whenever a major event occurs that is guaranteed to infuriate a large portion of/the populace, it is always rolled out while that faction has “their man “ in the WH. That’s how you know everything is orchestrated, and conspiracies are underway
Exactly correct. Reagan and poppi bush had to fight like hell to institute neoconservative economic policies (sell us out to wall street). Bubba Clinton was able to grease them through like butter - even cut welfare while he was at it. No one said ****. Imagine a repubican cutting welfare?
1 Nomination
SJConspirator Jun 29, 2022
Go to original post on Jun 30, 2022 11:47am
7 Jul 2022 11:42 am
How long before the first dead body is found in it?
Only a matter of time before some ghetto *** get caught picking all the watermelon and hot sauce in the middle of the night by some poor volunteer night watchman who gets shot to death for asking them to leave.
1 Nomination
TB7 Jul 06, 2022
Go to original post on Jul 07, 2022 12:29pm
Only a matter of time before some ghetto *** get caught picking all the watermelon and hot sauce in the middle of the night by some poor volunteer night watchman who gets shot to death for asking them to leave.
1 Nomination
TB7 Jul 06, 2022
Go to original post on Jul 07, 2022 12:29pm
8 Jul 2022 3:53 pm
9 Jul 2022 2:48 pm
The insane form of political discourse going on today was literally socially engineered by a political strategist (((artur finklestein)))....and I see so many people on this forum falling for it.
To some extent, the 'right' versus 'left' labels are not even useful. you cannot really compare them ideologically. if anything, these categories refer to two distinct echo chambers in the united states. the people in both echo chambers will literally adopt and reject basically any opinion pushed by the people controlling their echo chamber. And it is important for the people in power that this division among the american people is as close to 50-50 as possible.
now there are some other qualitative differences. The 'left' is more brainwashed. The 'right' is largely composed of people who are open to rational thinking and compromise.
and for this reason, the left always wins. Because people who refuse to compromise will always defeat people who will compromise. It just takes x amount of time.
but the issues that people argue about are just engineered, and the '2' sides of politics is merely a way to construct a false dilemma. the 'left' and the 'right' argue with each other about stuff that doesnt even matter...and this way things that DO matter can be completely ignored, and the elites do whatever they like about things that matter.
and the way you engineer the opinions of both sides is simply by demonizing the other side...for example 'i am opposed to social programs because all the people in favor of social programs are **** people'. the media could very easily make the entire 'left' opposed to environmentalism if they simply convinced the left that donald trump is an environmentalist. then they could talk about how environmentalism is a form of white supremacy, only rich white people can afford to go on hikes in nature, etc etc. The policy itself is less important than which people support the policy.
the modern 'right wing' is a product of the 'Young Americans for Freedom'...which was a totally artificial political movement created to co-opt what the right wing was at that time....which happened to be getting very fascist (Lincoln Rockwell, George Wallace, etc)...just like Karl Marx was created to co opt the socialist philosophy of Charles Fourier and make it less anti Semitic. While Francis Parker Yorkey was reaching out to communist governments because he perceived a mutual interest of fighting the power of organized world jewry....the YAF went on a crusade against communism....and completely ignored issues like civil rights, hart cellar act, the decline of sexual morality in the country, etc.
i have little hope that people who identify as 'left wing' could ever step out of their paradigm...but i do hope that some people on the 'right' will be able to step out of their Finklethink paradigm. There is no reason for you to be supporting corporations, for example, simply because the left pretends to be opposed to corporations. All the corporations have obviously gone 'woke'...they are not your friend. It is also bizarre that so many people on the 'right' are pro-Israel... Israel has literally never done anything for the american people...quite the opposite. Your media is just manipulating you emotions: Arab terrorists have attacked us, Arabs hate Israel, therefore we love Isreal...this is not a rational approach to politics.
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jul 08, 2022
Go to original post on May 12, 2021 1:31pm
To some extent, the 'right' versus 'left' labels are not even useful. you cannot really compare them ideologically. if anything, these categories refer to two distinct echo chambers in the united states. the people in both echo chambers will literally adopt and reject basically any opinion pushed by the people controlling their echo chamber. And it is important for the people in power that this division among the american people is as close to 50-50 as possible.
now there are some other qualitative differences. The 'left' is more brainwashed. The 'right' is largely composed of people who are open to rational thinking and compromise.
and for this reason, the left always wins. Because people who refuse to compromise will always defeat people who will compromise. It just takes x amount of time.
but the issues that people argue about are just engineered, and the '2' sides of politics is merely a way to construct a false dilemma. the 'left' and the 'right' argue with each other about stuff that doesnt even matter...and this way things that DO matter can be completely ignored, and the elites do whatever they like about things that matter.
and the way you engineer the opinions of both sides is simply by demonizing the other side...for example 'i am opposed to social programs because all the people in favor of social programs are **** people'. the media could very easily make the entire 'left' opposed to environmentalism if they simply convinced the left that donald trump is an environmentalist. then they could talk about how environmentalism is a form of white supremacy, only rich white people can afford to go on hikes in nature, etc etc. The policy itself is less important than which people support the policy.
the modern 'right wing' is a product of the 'Young Americans for Freedom'...which was a totally artificial political movement created to co-opt what the right wing was at that time....which happened to be getting very fascist (Lincoln Rockwell, George Wallace, etc)...just like Karl Marx was created to co opt the socialist philosophy of Charles Fourier and make it less anti Semitic. While Francis Parker Yorkey was reaching out to communist governments because he perceived a mutual interest of fighting the power of organized world jewry....the YAF went on a crusade against communism....and completely ignored issues like civil rights, hart cellar act, the decline of sexual morality in the country, etc.
i have little hope that people who identify as 'left wing' could ever step out of their paradigm...but i do hope that some people on the 'right' will be able to step out of their Finklethink paradigm. There is no reason for you to be supporting corporations, for example, simply because the left pretends to be opposed to corporations. All the corporations have obviously gone 'woke'...they are not your friend. It is also bizarre that so many people on the 'right' are pro-Israel... Israel has literally never done anything for the american people...quite the opposite. Your media is just manipulating you emotions: Arab terrorists have attacked us, Arabs hate Israel, therefore we love Isreal...this is not a rational approach to politics.
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jul 08, 2022
Go to original post on May 12, 2021 1:31pm
10 Jul 2022 3:02 pm
10 Jul 2022 6:42 pm
Do you feel the “Gay Agenda is been pushed too mainstream? I personally feel like the LGBTQ community has been under attack lately, because of this “Gay Agenda”. You turn on the TV screens you say more and more of the gay community, honestly, I think it's great. We need to be more inclusive.
1 Nomination
Messiah DuPont Jul 09, 2022
Go to original post on Jul 10, 2022 1:12pm
11 Jul 2022 6:03 pm
Arachibutyrophobia » 11 Jul 2022, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑ Click on the link.
Twitter suspended the user. If Twitter suspends the user, you can rest assured that the information they posted was real.
Those mother ****.
Shows why it was retarded to put faith in a guy named elon.
1 Nomination
SJConspirator Jul 10, 2022
Go to original post on Jul 11, 2022 5:58pm
12 Jul 2022 9:25 am
I'm not vaxed. I went to three doctors and asked them the simple question: "Are the vaxes safe" all three said "Nope!" I did a few hours of research and found out that the people running the covid **** show have conflicts of interests, don't use real science, example: masks work to stop virus vs 20 years of peer reviewed science that says the opposite. All the lies the people with conflicts of interest told like "two weeks to flatten the curve" "get the vax and go back to normal" "the vax gives you immunity, and stops the spread" "get two shots and go back to normal" "Get three shots and go back to normal" etc...
They said the vax is safe but are shielded from liability, if it's so safe they wouldn't need that protection and could prove it by removing it.
Over 800 vaxed athletes dropping dead and having strokes / heart attacks. Pfizer's own documents, you know the ones they tried to hide the data from for 75 years, prove they knew the vaxes were not safe, and say in them people will run the risk of myocarditis, among the other about 1000 side effects that are ****, from shingles to face paralysis and death.
The worst is still on the way, and when all of you woefully ignorant "vaccine" idiots finally realize they lied to you, I hope you wake up pissed off at the people that tricked you and or coerced and extorted your livelihoods, get what they deserve. It's like everyone forgot how the flu works.
Conspiracy you say? The most untrusted corporation that has put profit over human lives is suddenly humanitarians to you? Bill Gates that has maimed and killed over 500,000 children in India with his so-called philanthropist vaccine work that got the Bill and blah blah foundation banned from there and has stated he made 10's of billions in profit from, all the while claiming the world is overpopulated and something needs to be done.
The name of his foundation used to be called "Bill & Melinda foundation for population control"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aj7NhfaK_A
The only good thing that might come out of this in time is [given that the specialists in the medical field are correct] all the ignorant stupid vaxed **** will be dying and getting **** by a thing they had to change the definition of "vaccine" "pandemic" and "Gain of function" to keep their narrative going that has made them over 100 billion so far. Time will tell, and if there isn't going to be a **** ton of you around any more, perhaps the world will be a better place after all.
Anyone who tries to force vax me against my will, and tries to give me an unwanted shot, will be getting shot. They can vax my dead body if they want. lolz.
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jul 11, 2022
Go to original post on Jul 11, 2022 6:48pm
They said the vax is safe but are shielded from liability, if it's so safe they wouldn't need that protection and could prove it by removing it.
Over 800 vaxed athletes dropping dead and having strokes / heart attacks. Pfizer's own documents, you know the ones they tried to hide the data from for 75 years, prove they knew the vaxes were not safe, and say in them people will run the risk of myocarditis, among the other about 1000 side effects that are ****, from shingles to face paralysis and death.
The worst is still on the way, and when all of you woefully ignorant "vaccine" idiots finally realize they lied to you, I hope you wake up pissed off at the people that tricked you and or coerced and extorted your livelihoods, get what they deserve. It's like everyone forgot how the flu works.
Conspiracy you say? The most untrusted corporation that has put profit over human lives is suddenly humanitarians to you? Bill Gates that has maimed and killed over 500,000 children in India with his so-called philanthropist vaccine work that got the Bill and blah blah foundation banned from there and has stated he made 10's of billions in profit from, all the while claiming the world is overpopulated and something needs to be done.
The name of his foundation used to be called "Bill & Melinda foundation for population control"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aj7NhfaK_A
The only good thing that might come out of this in time is [given that the specialists in the medical field are correct] all the ignorant stupid vaxed **** will be dying and getting **** by a thing they had to change the definition of "vaccine" "pandemic" and "Gain of function" to keep their narrative going that has made them over 100 billion so far. Time will tell, and if there isn't going to be a **** ton of you around any more, perhaps the world will be a better place after all.
Anyone who tries to force vax me against my will, and tries to give me an unwanted shot, will be getting shot. They can vax my dead body if they want. lolz.
1 Nomination
Cannonpointer Jul 11, 2022
Go to original post on Jul 11, 2022 6:48pm
Who is online
In total there are 3507 users online :: 6 registered, 13 bots, and 3488 guests
Bots: Kinza, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, proximic, NING, Firefox/7.0, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot