[quote="GHETTOBLASTER" post_id=1945388 time=1644546278 user_id=3087]
What has 50 years of UNICEF accomplished..?
More starving Africans than ever before.
What will increased welfare create...?
More welfare babies for YOU to raise than ever before.
We have never seen this way of thinking trend downward...ever.
All of our low skilled labor that can be replaced by robots WILL be replaced by robots.
Job opportunities for people who are marginally employable today will become increasingly scarce as time marches on.
We need to allow Darwin to do his thing..and even give Darwin some help..instead of finding more ways to work against Darwin.[/quote]
You are misinterpreting my position. I do not believe in unconditional welfare or "aid" to Africa. I am 100% opposed to mass immigration.
What I am doing is setting up an ideological framework that integrates "real economics" (studying economics from a position where you FIRST OBSERVE real world phenomena before making conclusions, [b]e.g. "Minimum Wage bad cuz my model says MW increases black unemployment"[/b] /facepalm) and then tying up loose ends.
Most economists begin with faulty assumptions...as they were predictably lied to by (((the propagandists))) in higher education as to disarm them to the true nature of how our economy works. Then these economists present doctrine/dogma as if they were fact...when they are not. Disarming people by supplying them with disinformation is a primary tactic of (((OUR FRIENDS))), and as much as you would loathe to admit, perhaps even you should consider the possibility you are a victim to their wiles on the subject of economics.
My argument, [b]if you carefully read my post (just above this one)[/b] is that welfare WORKS in primarily white, high-trust, and wealthy societies, because the typical European white is far more likely to "contribute" and provide some sort of value. The Danish welfare system is not going to collapse unless Danes suddenly have some kind of shift (in demographics, for example).
Look, I understand you dislike the idea of welfare. Nobody wants people to scrounge/leech off the system, and I do not find your sentiments unreasonable at all. But that is a [b]value judgment. [/b]It is irrelevant to the discussion of whether welfare seriously disincentives work.
Whether you like the idea of welfare or not does not change the fact that [b]the welfare system (e.g. in Denmark) "works" given their constraints/conditions and does not have a seriously negative impact on their employment rate. I have already shown you why this is the case. [/b]On the other hand you can certainly make the case that welfare does seriously disincentivize work among ****** as ****** do not have the same standards/values/"mental capacity" for work that is necessary to become middle class in modern America.
One final minor correction - [b]it is not our "tax money" that pays for these welfare types.[/b] I do not believe "our tax dollars" have paid for anything in decades...the way our system works is that whenever the federal government needs to spend something on whatever purpose they claim, the money (which is actually debt) is supplied by our [b]private banking system[/b] which then collects interest on the "loans" made. And it should not shock you a (((Certain group))) is there as recipients of the interest.
In reality your "tax dollars" probably go into "garbage collection" on some computer database linked to the IRS...the same way when you modify some cell on an Excel spreadsheet.
I apologize for my lengthy posts, but I feel obligated to correct misunderstandings when they arise, as I am first and foremost a seeker of truth.
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=841][b][color=#FF6600]Cannonpointer[/color][/b][/url] [size=85]Feb 10, 2022[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1945457#p1945457]Go to original post on Feb 10, 2022 9:02pm[/url]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1945483#p1945483]Go to nomination on Feb 10, 2022 11:53pm[/url]