FOS » 07 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑
I have seen WAY too many times liberals/lefties/normies conflate conservatism and fascism...or perhaps view fascism as a more 'extreme' form of conservatism.
I read your wall of text and agree with about 85% of it.
Things I would like to add:
"And conservatives seem to love calling you guys communist."
American conservatives are retarded, big surprise...
European conservatism/monarchism are closer to fascism but not quite there. Fascism is the completion of these flawed ideologies.
Monarchism is too outdated and conservatism is too weak. I do not trust European black-pilled conservatives to, for example, do away with (((usury))). It would simply continue unabated and the (((looting and plundering))) would continue because Euro cons are either too ignorant or too stupid to understand how international finance/banking works.
"But IN PRACTICE it turned out that fascist countries had MORE nationalized ownership of industry than say...the Soviet Union....Italy being the highest at about 70% (compared to about 60% from the ussr)...probably because their trade was far more protectionist than communist countries."
For the economically retarded/ignorant, there's a good explanation for this phenomenon.
The reason fascist economics works, contrary to liberTARDian and neoliberal propaganda, is that fascists understand the "free market" is mostly fiction.
When Adam Smith used the term, he was referring to markets free from monopolies, oligopolies, and rent seeking. It's like showing up to a flea market with 100s of vendors. Neither buyers nor sellers have any distinct advantage so the "profit" is close to zero.
However, (((Chicago School of Economics))) and their well paid army of liars told everybody that "fwee mauket" means letting big corps run rampant "coz regoolayshun bad." And doing so will unleash a torrent of gee dee pee growth...which never happened (and when it did happen it wasn't due to slashing regoolayshunz)
Lax regulation combined with "private enterprise" fares well in new/unexplored markets like the Internet in the 90s. Plenty of new market share for new players. It also works somewhat well in markets where one-player-takes-all is close to impossible (restaurants for instance).
It fares terribly in heavily saturated/monopolized/2-6 player oligopoly sectors like utilities, media/telecom, some sectors of Internet like search, rail, and esp. money.
Fascists know this which is why they have no qualms with nationalizing sectors, but because highly educated but retarded Americans can't formulate a single critical thought on their own, we're left bearing extremely high costs of prerequisites like the cost of transportation, cost of fuel, cost of Internet, cost of water (Nestle buys out local H2O supplies for $.0000000002/gallon and sells it back to you for $.02/gallon BE SURE TO THANK YOUR BOUGHT AND PAID FOR LOCAL POLITICIAN) etc
Retarded conjobs think this amounts to freeDUMB while retarded libTARDS think raising the MW (the burden of which falls most heavily on small businesses almost exclusively operating in perfect competition/highly elastic markets) instead of doing away with the (((parasites))) is the answer.
1 Nomination
SJConspirator Dec 24, 2022
Go to original post on Dec 24, 2022 4:17am
Go to nomination on Dec 24, 2022 5:13pm