⭐️ Post of the Day - Winners ⭐️

1 2 3 4 5 21
User avatar
DrMorbius
9 Mar 2021 6:44 am
User avatar
 
15 posts
Experienced and respected educators on either side of the political fence agree that some books are not age-appropriate for youngsters, yet are important enough to be available to students once they've reached a certain maturity.  A good example, I think, would be The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.  The book is controversial and has been since it was published some 140 years ago, partly because it features the "n-word" 200 times.  Students below a sixth-grade reading level probably won't get the underlying message of the book and might quote it, but students above a sixth-grade reading level would gain an important perspective on American life in the antebellum south.

Lord of the Flies is another book I would suggest is inappropriate for young children (it's pretty violent), but as a tool to teach symbolism in literature it is priceless to teachers in middle and high schools.

So, my belief (and I'm a liberal) is that restrictions may fairly be applied by school authorities and yes, parents, but I'd be opposed to outright bans.

However, I remember as a young man being very frustrated that I was only allowed to check out books far below my reading level.  My parents strongly encouraged reading and I was reading before I went to school.  By the time I was in fifth grade I was reading adult novels at home, mostly science fiction because that's what my father liked.  But my local public library had a policy and I remember being quite frustrated.  My personal experience leads me to think that schools and libraries should be flexible about which books to allow to which students; if a kid in fourth grade reads at a seventh grade level, let him borrow books at that level.



2 Nominations

Annoyed Liberall Mar 07, 2021, Coolguy10013 Mar 07, 2021

Go to original post on Mar 08, 2021 7:40am
Go to nomination on Mar 08, 2021 10:54am
User avatar
SJConspirator
12 Mar 2021 6:52 am
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
This bill could make America mediocre again. Which would be a step up for us at this point.



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Mar 10, 2021

Go to original post on Mar 11, 2021 9:39am
Go to nomination on Mar 11, 2021 2:33pm
User avatar
RollingRock
18 Mar 2021 6:51 am
User avatar
Liberals Only Moderator
Liberals Only Moderator
133 posts
Coolguy10013 » 11 Mar 2021, 12:29 pm » wrote: I want the filibuster to go way also, but this is one of those cases where "be careful what you wish for" comes into play.
It definitely is.  However, I see it this way:  If Dems kill the filibuster and push through legislation that 83 million Biden voters want, then we will be in good shape to keep both houses in 2022.

If there's nothing but a long string of "didn't get it done because we didn't have 60 votes" scenarios, we WILL lose in 2022.  No doubt about it.   Jmo...


  
 



1 Nomination

Phelix_Dacat Mar 11, 2021

Go to original post on Mar 11, 2021 1:50pm
Go to nomination on Mar 11, 2021 10:29pm
User avatar
DrMorbius
21 Mar 2021 5:49 pm
21 Mar 2021 5:49 pm
User avatar
 
15 posts
Cedar » 19 Mar 2021, 1:09 am » wrote: The federal government can affect your local taxes with cuts to programs, education was a big one here a few years back. That said I don’t think Biden has been in long enough to **** up your taxes yet, next year should be interesting. Image
Typically, cuts in federal spending lead to increases in state taxes.  President Biden has not cut federal spending; in fact, he has been spending like a Republican so far.  I've been watching government a long time, and here's the deal: both parties spend like crazy.  Democrats increase taxes (usually on top earners and corporations), Republicans decrease taxes (again, usually mostly in favor of top earners and corporations), but both sides spend.  Debt increases when Democrats are in power, debt increases astronomically when Republicans are in power.  Debt always increases.
 



2 Nominations

Annoyed Liberall Mar 18, 2021, Huey Mar 18, 2021

Go to original post on Mar 19, 2021 1:18am
Go to nomination on Mar 19, 2021 5:09pm
Vegas
24 Mar 2021 11:34 am
Giant Slayer
13,908 posts
I don't know if all lefties her defend having children decide their own gender. It wouldn't surprise me if all of you did, but I do know there is some. Our frontal lobes don't even fully develop until around 25. How the hell would a child know what gender they identify with?



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Mar 22, 2021

Go to original post on Mar 22, 2021 11:03pm
Go to nomination on Mar 23, 2021 12:56pm
User avatar
Annoyed Liberall
25 Mar 2021 6:35 am
User avatar
Hot Little Twist
Hot Little Twist
653 posts
Cannonpointer » 24 Mar 2021, 12:37 pm » wrote: Absolute horse **** pick.

The corona vaccine is EXPERIMENTAL. It is against the GENEVA CONVENTIONS to force ANY HUMAN BEING to accept experimental treatments - even when they are NOT rushed to market and spared proper vetting.
Sorry, man.
I don't have to agree with the content to see the merit in it.
It was a well thought out post with original thought.
That's the standard here.
Not whether I agree with something or not.
User avatar
Zeets2
5 Apr 2021 7:55 am
User avatar
      
5,546 posts
AnnoyedLiberall » 02 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm » wrote: I am stating facts.
You just don't like them.
What have I said that's not a fact?
Sorry, but it's certainly not a fact that Chauvin was out to "punish" Floyd.  That's your opinion, and it's not supported by any factual evidence.  You then make the claim that it was "obvious" that Floyd WOULD have gotten into the police car, despite the efforts of 3 policemen who were unable to force him in.  And despite what you claim, the "smirk" you saw on Chauvin's face DOES NOT "say it all".  Facial expressions are NOT permissible as factual evidence of a crime, thank God!  Furthermore, you offered the opinion that the cops had the equipment out to hog-tie him, wondering why that wasn't used.  The fact is that hog-tying a suspect is not permitted under the MN Police Guidelines, and then speculate that the police "had other options", and that the police made "bad choices" which have consequences.  Again, those are opinions that I don't believe you're qualified to make.  Beyond that, you made the error of stating that counterfeiting is nothing but a misdemeanor, which is completely false.

You get the idea, and you should know that I have no problem with you stating your opinions.  But if you're going to chastise others like Buffalo for providing HIS opinions, then take full authority on whether or not you'll allow his opinion "to stand" until you eventually throw him off the thread, I see that as being disingenuous, and your bias on the case doesn't appear to be obvious to you.
 



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Apr 02, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 02, 2021 1:47pm
Go to nomination on Apr 03, 2021 1:15pm
User avatar
Zeets2
6 Apr 2021 6:47 am
User avatar
      
5,546 posts
AnnoyedLiberall » 02 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm » wrote: I am stating facts.
You just don't like them.
What have I said that's not a fact?
Sorry, but it's certainly not a fact that Chauvin was out to "punish" Floyd.  That's your opinion, and it's not supported by any factual evidence.  You then make the claim that it was "obvious" that Floyd WOULD have gotten into the police car, despite the efforts of 3 policemen who were unable to force him in.  And despite what you claim, the "smirk" you saw on Chauvin's face DOES NOT "say it all".  Facial expressions are NOT permissible as factual evidence of a crime, thank God!  Furthermore, you offered the opinion that the cops had the equipment out to hog-tie him, wondering why that wasn't used.  The fact is that hog-tying a suspect is not permitted under the MN Police Guidelines, and then speculate that the police "had other options", and that the police made "bad choices" which have consequences.  Again, those are opinions that I don't believe you're qualified to make.  Beyond that, you made the error of stating that counterfeiting is nothing but a misdemeanor, which is completely false.

You get the idea, and you should know that I have no problem with you stating your opinions.  But if you're going to chastise others like Buffalo for providing HIS opinions, then take full authority on whether or not you'll allow his opinion "to stand" until you eventually throw him off the thread, I see that as being disingenuous, and your bias on the case doesn't appear to be obvious to you.
 



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Apr 02, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 02, 2021 1:47pm
Go to nomination on Apr 03, 2021 1:15pm
User avatar
GeorgeWashington
7 Apr 2021 1:54 pm
User avatar
   
1,022 posts
RollingRock » 02 Apr 2021, 10:24 am » wrote:
Cannonpointer » 01 Apr 2021, 11:59 pm » wrote: No, you won't. You will be receiving an experimental gene therapy next week.
Nope, I will be receiving the coronavirus vaccine.  Experimental procedures aren't covered under my medical insurance.
Vaccines/drugs are experimental until they are approved by the FDA. The COVID vaccines are unapproved, therefore they are experimental.

  •  WHAT IS THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
    The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.
    https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
  • What Are Clinical Trials and Studies?
    • A Phase III trial gathers more information about safety and effectiveness, studying different populations and different dosages, using the drug in combination with other drugs. The number of subjects usually ranges from several hundred to about 3,000 people. If the FDA agrees that the trial results are positive, it will approve the experimental drug or device.
    • A Phase IV trial for drugs or devices takes place after the FDA approves their use. A device or drug's effectiveness and safety are monitored in large, diverse populations. Sometimes, the side effects of a drug may not become clear until more people have taken it over a longer period of time.
      https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/what-are ... nd-studies
  • It is important to note that a vaccine is a drug.
    https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biol ... opment-101
 
 



2 Nominations

Cannonpointer Apr 03, 2021, GeorgeWashington Apr 03, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 02, 2021 1:12pm
Go to nomination on Apr 04, 2021 11:44am
User avatar
Neo
11 Apr 2021 9:11 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
RollingRock » 09 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm » wrote: I really hope that's not the case (for many reasons).  Most importantly, I think the prosecution's witnesses and experts have been beyond compelling.  I can't imagine they won't find Chauvin guilty of one of the charges.  But history does show that in cases like this, the cop almost always walks...so nothing's for certain.
I consider you pretty logical and level headed. It's amazing how two reasonable and intelligent people can see this case so differently. I am sure I have my blind spots as well but, it seems from any unbiased look at this case, that Mr Floyd had a life long struggle with addiction to some very deadly drugs. That shortly before he died he was suffering an overdose when he was dealing with law enforcement.  That he died as a result of not getting immediate treatment for the overdose. 

He was complaining about trouble breathing several minutes before being put on the ground.

He had a feeling of impending doom and was paranoid.

He had a 3x lethal amount of fentanyl in his system coupled with methamphetamine.

I don't dispute the findings of the experts, he died from hypoxia. He was unable to get enough oxygen to his brain to sustain life. I disagree with their conclusions that it was positional asphyxia. I am insulted by an expert that claims one minutes that 97.8 pounds of pressure was applied to Floyd's neck one minute and admits during cross-examination that the knee was on his shoulders.  Upset by media coverage that is only focusing on the prosecution’s statements and answers, including the defense portions as an ineffective afterthought. 

Blm leaders have already indicated that anything less than a murder conviction will result in violence. I have never been a fan of violence to promote a political agenda. From right wing wack jobs shooting up churches to blm agitators burning and looting stores, it's all unjustified idiocy. The fact these threats are made and are quite plausible is disturbing.  Hopefully you will join me in condemning the violence before it predictably takes place.



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Apr 09, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 09, 2021 2:29pm
Go to nomination on Apr 10, 2021 6:11pm
User avatar
Neo
19 Apr 2021 7:05 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
RollingRock » 09 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm » wrote: I really hope that's not the case (for many reasons).  Most importantly, I think the prosecution's witnesses and experts have been beyond compelling.  I can't imagine they won't find Chauvin guilty of one of the charges.  But history does show that in cases like this, the cop almost always walks...so nothing's for certain.
I consider you pretty logical and level headed. It's amazing how two reasonable and intelligent people can see this case so differently. I am sure I have my blind spots as well but, it seems from any unbiased look at this case, that Mr Floyd had a life long struggle with addiction to some very deadly drugs. That shortly before he died he was suffering an overdose when he was dealing with law enforcement.  That he died as a result of not getting immediate treatment for the overdose. 

He was complaining about trouble breathing several minutes before being put on the ground.

He had a feeling of impending doom and was paranoid.

He had a 3x lethal amount of fentanyl in his system coupled with methamphetamine.

I don't dispute the findings of the experts, he died from hypoxia. He was unable to get enough oxygen to his brain to sustain life. I disagree with their conclusions that it was positional asphyxia. I am insulted by an expert that claims one minutes that 97.8 pounds of pressure was applied to Floyd's neck one minute and admits during cross-examination that the knee was on his shoulders.  Upset by media coverage that is only focusing on the prosecution’s statements and answers, including the defense portions as an ineffective afterthought. 

Blm leaders have already indicated that anything less than a murder conviction will result in violence. I have never been a fan of violence to promote a political agenda. From right wing wack jobs shooting up churches to blm agitators burning and looting stores, it's all unjustified idiocy. The fact these threats are made and are quite plausible is disturbing.  Hopefully you will join me in condemning the violence before it predictably takes place.



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Apr 09, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 09, 2021 2:29pm
Go to nomination on Apr 10, 2021 6:11pm
User avatar
Ike Bana
20 Apr 2021 6:41 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
2,427 posts
FOS » 19 Apr 2021, 6:30 pm » wrote: when a *** like yourself is just being a ***, there is no other response. 

If you...or cyndi...ever manage to make a coherent point then I would have to respond to it.

But you can't. All you can ever do is ***.
LIke this is a coherent point.  All you ever do is jewbashing. 

You're an envious loser because the Jews figured out how to beat you at your own game.  Jews do free enterprise better than you do.  They do free enterprise better than just about everybody.  They outsmarted you all by not trying to break through your **** glass ceiling.  They sent their kids to college to be doctors and lawyers and scientists and ENTREPRENEURS...and they didn't need your christian corporate boardrooms, or your **** up middle management jobs.  And you know who realized this?  Malcolm X.  Malcolm tried his best to keep his people from beating their heads against the glass ceiling trying to get white christians to treat them fairly.  He tried to tell his people to do it the way the Jews did it.  Stay in your neighborhoods.  Work for your own people, buy from your own people, employ your own people, save your money, send your kids to college to be doctors and lawyers and accountants and entrepreneurs.  But Malcolm was just a little too much, and Dr. King was so much more easy to listen to and rally behind.  But Malcolm wouldn't shut up...so they finally killed him for it.  It's too bad, because it works.  And the reason you're so hateful and envious is because the Jews beat you at your own game.

The other interesting thing about Jews is their attitude about conflict.  Take a Jew kid living in some christian neighborhood, getting beat up and ridiculed all the time.  Does he ever go get himself a gun and take revenge on his tormentors?  Nope. Hand him a gun and you know what he says?  Holy ****!  A gun!!! And he runs the other way.  But put the same Jew in a Jewish army with a bunch of other Jews who know all the history of how their ancestors were victimized by you people, you Egyptians, you Spanish Inquisition priests, you Germans..  And they say...**** you and what you think we oughta be doing about our friendly neighbors who only want peace. Image  **** you and your demands about how we oughta be defending ourselves. 

Get those Jews into a uniform, give them a Tavor X95 and when they run into somebody like you who looks a little threatening and they'll kill you in a nanosecond.  And never give your sniveling, miserable, pathetic fat dead *** a second thought.
 
 



1 Nomination

FOS Apr 19, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 19, 2021 6:44pm
Go to nomination on Apr 19, 2021 7:34pm
User avatar
RollingRock
22 Apr 2021 2:25 pm
User avatar
Liberals Only Moderator
Liberals Only Moderator
133 posts
AnnoyedLiberall » 21 Apr 2021, 1:24 pm » wrote: Let's not forget that the rank and file did not come out against him.
Only the higher ups.
The culture of the cops on the street is unchanged I am afraid.
Point taken, AL.  You're correct.  :)    I'm hoping that this is at least a start towards meaningful change to the culture on the streets.  I'm definitely not a "defund the police" lefty, but I do believe there needs to be far more accountability and transparency.  The killing of George Floyd wasn't Derek Chauvin's first encounter with police misconduct, by any means.  Most police perform admirably in a very dangerous job - it's cops like Chauvin that destroy public trust and perception of law enforcement.   



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Apr 20, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 21, 2021 1:39pm
Go to nomination on Apr 21, 2021 1:48pm
Vegas
10 May 2021 9:03 am
Giant Slayer
13,908 posts
So, as you all know, Meltdown Mary, aka @Blackvegetable  ,  doesn't like to be exposed for the fraud and idiot that he is. Which is why I enjoy exposing him as the fraud and idiot that he is. I enjoy his meltdowns and tantrums that can last for days sometimes. Why am I starting this tribute thread for him? Two reasons: 1. I love triggering him to meltdown mode and 2. I love to expose him as the fraud and idiot that he is. 

Below is a link to all of Veghead's threads that he has started. Veghead does not think for himself, I don't think he has the intellectual capacity. Every thread he starts is a copy/paste from the internet with no thoughts of his own...well, except calling Trump supporters slackjaws and whatever else. But that doesn't count. Most every member I see here offers their thoughts on their links, their own interpretation, and they make an original argument on their own. Veghead prefers to let the internet talk for him, then belt out 70k questions without answering any.

Here is my friendly bet. If anyone can find one OP of his where he made an argument on his own, gave his own thoughts, gave his own interpretations, or reasoned anything out on his own, I will give that person 100 greenies. 

If nobody can find one, then I am to be nominated for the post award.

There are 73 pages of this ****: threads/Blackvegetable

@Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  What do you think?
 



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Apr 25, 2021

Go to original post on Apr 26, 2021 1:39pm
Go to nomination on Apr 26, 2021 5:16pm
User avatar
Neo
1 Jun 2021 11:11 am
Neo
User avatar
     
3,818 posts
Bidennextpresident » 23 May 2021, 8:50 pm » wrote: Second time: Why do you--right wingers--keep talking about "narrative?"?
Because we are interested in the truth. The truth is cops do not hunt unarmed blacks. The truth is we have an issue with police abandoning community policing and adopting military control tactics. The race **** is getting in the way of developing solutions to a real problem. 
 



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall May 23, 2021

Go to original post on May 23, 2021 8:55pm
Go to nomination on May 24, 2021 8:12am
User avatar
SJConspirator
11 Jun 2021 6:28 am
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
Neo » 10 Jun 2021, 4:10 pm » wrote: Fair taxation would see those making 20% of the income paying 20% of the income taxes instead of 40% of the burden. We already have a progressive taxation system that puts most of the burden on the affluent. I don't think there is much call for "fair" taxation.
couple things...

1.  Your link talks about people making $540 k per year and lumps them in with billionaires, that’s insane.  In a country of 350 million, the top 1% is about 3.5 million people.  Out of THAT group, the richest 50 own far more than the others COMBINED.  And THOSE are the ones who pay no taxes, that tiny fraction of the populace at the tippy top.

So yeh, millionaires are overtaxed.  Billionaires are not.  And even if they were, you are basing your whole argument here on income tax, which is merely a tax on liquid gains in one year.  It says nothing about how the top .00001% own the media, the airports, the oil refineries and factories, toll roads, they basically own all the DEBT in the country (huge usury/interest $profits), all the land, the banks and other assets - including stocks which are taxed as capitol gains, a different bracket than income.

2.  You are not a billionaire.  If you were, you would be counting your money all day instead of posting here.  So why do you advocate for billionaires constantly when their economic interests are in direct conflict with yours?  You are like a battered spouse who makes excuses for the guy who keeps beating her ***
 
 
 



1 Nomination

SJConspirator Jun 10, 2021

Go to original post on Jun 10, 2021 11:35pm
Go to nomination on Jun 10, 2021 11:53pm
User avatar
Polar1ty
7 Jul 2021 6:47 am
User avatar
  
198 posts
DeezerShoove » 21 Jun 2021, 10:13 pm » wrote: In about 30 years the world population will stagnate to a 9 billion person plateau.

You selfish little **** get to contend with all that this will entail. I wonder what "this" will be?

My view is that it will be the too-many-rats-in-a-box scenario. Have fun.  Image
As fun as it is to mock Millennials, the game was over for many of them before they even sat down to play.

- Retarded government schools/teachers
- Lies and propaganda about college, student loans, employment (“I thought jerbs were supposed to be fun!”), etc.
- Fluoride in water 
- Pesticides and herbicides in food
- GMOs introduced in 1990s 
- Frankenfoods (bread, pasta, cereals, VEGETABLE oils - if Millennials had any vegetables in their diet it was probably corn or lettuce or some trash with low nutritional value) and Food Pyramid propaganda about “evil fats” and “6-11 servings carbs”
- Highest dosage of vaccines ever compared to prev gens...their bodies AND BRAINS poisoned @ young age
- Raised on SpongeBob and other TEEvee
- Day care ladies raised them coz mom thought working and being a wage slave = liberation
- Retarded parents thought letting kids play outside is “dangerous” so they stayed inside and didn’t get healthy amounts of exercise/activity unlike previous gens
- Fed Globalist and Jew propaganda in college - diversity good, white ppl bad, etc.
- Zero financial literacy (“I want to live in a nice big city like LA or NY where rent eats up $1800 to $2500 a month!”)
- USA flooded with H1B Curry *** and wetbacks to suppress wages

Basically if you’re a Millennial without half decent parents to teach you the harsh truths of life and/or support you it’s like playing poker against 3 ppl - they were handed an Ace, J, and 7 respectively as their first card while you were handed a 3. 

Can you win against these 3 players? Yes. Are the odds in your favor? No, unless you get “lucky” or were smart enough to do something like buy Bitcoin prior to 2013.


 Oh, and you don’t get to fold. You live once and die...I think.
 



1 Nomination

Annoyed Liberall Jun 22, 2021

Go to original post on Jun 22, 2021 3:37am
Go to nomination on Jun 23, 2021 6:35am
User avatar
FOS
16 Jul 2021 10:41 am
FOS
User avatar
      
5,543 posts
IkeBana » 09 Jul 2021, 7:56 am » wrote: This is no different from the "we support women athletes" ****.  You take an issue fold it six-ways, stuff it up your oozing rectal orifice until saturated, drag it back out and spread the **** around under the guise of supporting women, when the only thing it's about is your TDS (trans derangement syndrome) and anti-LGBTQ bigotry.

You don't give a **** about women athletes.  You don't give a **** about women in prison.  Lying cocksucker rent boi.  Nor does the rest of your twisted, sick, and wrong crew in this ****.
I do not entirely disagree with the way you are framing this...but your own assertions give it away that there is a more fundamental issue at hand than female athletes. 

I agree. It isn't that I don't care about female athletes...I actually kinda do...but their welfare has little to nothing to do with transgenderism. 

Transgenderism is profane. Because it is an attack on identity. 

For what reason would you pretend that people are not born with innate qualities?

I was born a man, a human, a person of European ancestry, the son of my father and mother, and based on my ancestry one could easily predict I would have a high iq, a short temper, and be lazy. 

You certainly would not allow me to deny the fact I am white when you come after me with your reparations for white privilege ****. So it is actually YOU who exposes yourself as disingenuous by having a double standard. People only have innate qualities when it suits you, and they don't when it suits you. 

Transgenderism is not only an attack on identitidentity attempt to imply that people can be molded into anything that is politically convenient...we can ignore their innate nature...

It is also an attack on sanity. The emperess not only has no clothes, she also has a penis. You want to gaslight people so hard that they fail to see the penis in the room?

Well I personally feel that both identity and sanity are important survival skills. The former allows cooperation, the latter allows us to use our brain which is a human's most important organ. 

the very idea of transgenderism is predicated on an anti survival,, suicidal attitude.. it is profanity to the point of pure evil.
 



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Jul 09, 2021

Go to original post on Jul 09, 2021 7:07am
Go to nomination on Jul 10, 2021 3:37am
User avatar
Cannonpointer
17 Aug 2021 1:43 pm
17 Aug 2021 1:43 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
33,312 posts
ArthurTreacher67 » 16 Aug 2021, 2:34 pm » wrote: CP, as LF's Grand Poobah, please consider reviewing this video and giving it a thumbs up or thumbs down.

Thank you.

In one minute, I think you will be hooked.

Bill Warner, PhD: Professional Ignorance

https://youtu.be/xhwBV39uWT0

"This is a talk given to political leaders. It covers how universities, law enforcement, clergy, politicians and military are not protecting our civilization via their professional ignorance. Institutions are failing and not doing their due diligence to learn and explain the true nature of political Islam. The problem is not Islam. We are the problem."

After one of Warner's speeches, a member of Germany's Executive Committee said, "I can now see after your talk we will never defeat Islam using our methods and that the only method will work are yours."
So, besides the biggest crime in history, which was/is the theft of this nation's currency issuance by a jewish cabal called the federal reserve bank, here are my issues:

1. Cock suckers molesting children with gender confusion mind games;
2. Cock suckers molesting women with gender confusion mind games;
3. Vax nazis trying to experiment on me and mine;
4. Climate nazis trying to tax the air I breathe;
5. Republicans and Democrats working in false opposition to enslave me to their wall street masters;
6. Neocon chicken hawks like bush and obama starting military adventures;
7. A nascent and uglifying police state;
8. The ongoing federalization of our daily lives;
9. Trade compacts like TPP and T-TIP by which demico-republicrats put global corporations above America's courts
10. The open and deliberate jew-inspired de-whiting of the earth.

In precisely ZERO of the issues I give one **** about are muslims involved. Every last one of them has jews at the top, jews in the middle and jews at the bottom, with a couple also utilizing retarded goy chicks. 

So, go **** yourself with this weak, sissified diversion - no one on this board is gonna bite. Image

1 Nomination

SJConspirator Aug 16, 2021

Go to original post on Aug 16, 2021 6:55pm
Go to nomination on Aug 16, 2021 7:11pm
 
User avatar
SJConspirator
19 Aug 2021 11:52 am
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
FOS » 17 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm » wrote: Remember that arrogant assumption prior to the Bush invasion of Iraq?

It was a very common assumption held by many us citizens. 

And the fact we were proven wrong, SHOULD have inspired us to re examine our assumptions about human nature and the nature of governmental power. 

But it didn't. We are dumb. 

It is predictable that we would have such incorrect predictions...because in the west we are sold absolutely absurd lies in our education which we never examine. 

"The peasants under Christian monarchies were miserable and oppressed. They hated being peasants and the lord or king had no respect for them and just expoited them"

remember being trained to think this? But there is a massive body of literature that proves this is a lie. 

You can simply read Shakespeare in fact. We writes about kings quite often..often amazingly he makes them very human. they were not evil...they also were not somehow innately superior. 

How can your education explain this? It can't. You would at the very least assume that Shakespeare...who himself lived under the yoke of oppressive absolute monarchy...would view them in one extreme or the other. 

And yet all the us citizens who read Shakespeare just never think about the inherent contradiction here. 

Shakespeare simply respected kings. He liked the institution...yet he did not view them as actual gods (as your Hollywood education on the divine right of kings might suggest). No, kings were the fallible tool for the collective will of the people...so in fact loving the people was akin to loving the king. The king may not always do the best job, but it was assumed that he tried to do a good job. 

And what did you learn about the French revolution? 

Well it might be surprising that the people overall loved the king...and indeed the peasants seemed very happy with their lives. 

And this love was mutual. Indeed the reason the revolution succeeded is precisely because the king ordered his army toarever shoot at the mob. You can easily confirm that this is true on Google or something...it is not controversial. 

Only the very first riot was put down (because the king did not expect it)..and the revolution was later nearly defeated simply by Swiss mercenaries (because of language issues...they did not seem to understand the kings will)

the French king conceded to every demand of the mob, and did not resist being imprisoned by them. 

Now obviously that begs the question...what really motivated the revolution and who were the real actors involved? That is a deep and complex question...and I don't want to delve into it here. It is enough for me to mention that it was almost the same as the bolshevik revolution in russia, with almost identical outcomes. 

the truth is...our liberal education is simply wrong about human nature. What people want far more than material comfort is a purpose for their life. 

and that is why the taliban defeated us. Because Islam is quite simply more inspiring than empowered hip hop American ***. 

I often hear leftists say "white people don't have a culture"...that is a VERY revealing belief. 

The truth is, we used to have a culture. It was stolen from us. Our indoctrination into nihilism is the only thing that maintains the current power structure, and allows our elite to exploit us far more than any king ever did.

The baathists...who were a secular pan Arabic political movement...exactly like like Arab version of the whitr nationalists in early america...wanted no part of this.
There is a clan of religious luddites in the U.S. called Amish.  They are very solemn and even fanatic in their beliefs, non violent but zealots nonetheless.  They shun every aspect of mainstream culture, no television, no phones, no cars except horse and buggy.

Their youth have a coming of age ritual called rumspringa.  When they are sixteen, they are free to leave the Amish land, mix with the wider American culture, enjoying the blessings of modern technology, democracy, fast food, video games, Hollywood, electricity, automation, food refrigeration, etc..

After 2 years, they must decide to either return to the harsh world of Luddism, constant prayer and chores in a tight knit community, or stay in the secular freedom of American life.

Nearly all of them return to the fold, choosing family, belonging and kinship over nihilism, hedonism and the nightmare that is modern American culture.  Why?

Because Bush and neocons were wrong.  Nobody wants our brand of freedom and democracy, when it comes at the cost of having no clan, no nation, no shared destiny.  The Middle East rejects it, Amish reject it, it’s garbage.  Our culture is utter trash, with its objectification of women, destructive and misery inducing feminist attitudes, junk food, mindless entertainment, fear and hysteria over non existent threats, anointing of greed as the ultimate virtue rather than one of the deadly sins, and false platitudes like “diversity is our strength!”

 
 



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Aug 17, 2021

Go to original post on Aug 17, 2021 7:18pm
Go to nomination on Aug 18, 2021 2:31pm
1 2 3 4 5 21

Who is online

In total there are 191 users online :: 15 registered, 16 bots, and 160 guests
Bots: Not, Custo, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, app.hypefactors.com, Applebot, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, CriteoBot, semantic-visions.com, trendictionbot, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2024 Liberal Forum