Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/20 ... able-8.xls
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Since you are limiting it to victims of rifles, wouldn't that be "Rifle Control"?
To be consistent, shouldn't you limit the "knives or cutting instrument toll" to "people killed by broadsword or sabre"?
I don't see that anywhere in the OP....Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ No. All rifles are not erroneously called Assault Rifles but assault rifle deaths are counted under Rifles. If you go read Joe Biden's gun control proposals it is alleged assault rifles he wants to restrict or take away.
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ I don't see that anywhere in the OP....
Maybe you should have made clear that you are yappping about something you heard....
Is this the alpha and omega of your argument?Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ You asked and I answered. Do you wish to discuss this or are you trolling? More people are killed with knives and cutting instruments than assault rifles as state in the OP. If people's concern is with people dying why are you concentrating on what you erroneously call an assault rifle?
If you have a point you may make it thru points and citations. If not, don't bother.Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ Is this the alpha and omega of your argument?
What is the largest number of people killed by someone wielding a knife?
Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ If you have a point you may make it thru points and citations. If not, don't bother.
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ I just made it....
That's why you flinched at the question....
Hold on, Stupid...Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't flinch at anything. My point was made and sourced. You? Not so much. Let me know when you do. You disrupt enough threads around here with your childish antics.
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ Hold on, Stupid...
My point doesn't need to be "sourced", it is derived from your "argument"....
You think asserting something stupid, and linking to unrelated twaddle constitutes an "argument".....it doesn't...
Now Neuter Up and find your balks...
Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Again, more people from knives than they do rifles, which include misnamed assault rifles. Yet, no one is calling for control of knives. Your turn to dispute or make a point. Without questions. Since you are simply a man of average intelligence and breeding I don't think you are capable.
QED.Your turn to dispute or make a point. Without questions.
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑Is this the alpha and omega of your argument?Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ You asked and I answered. Do you wish to discuss this or are you trolling? More people are killed with knives and cutting instruments than assault rifles as state in the OP. If people's concern is with people dying why are you concentrating on what you erroneously call an assault rifle?
What is the largest number of people killed by someone wielding a knife?
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Again, more people from knives than they do rifles, which include misnamed assault rifles. Yet, no one is calling for control of knives. Your turn to dispute or make a point. Without questions. Since you are simply a man of average intelligence and breeding I don't think you are capable.QED.Your turn to dispute or make a point. Without questions.
Are you actually whining about the unfairness of "rifle control"?Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”
Vegas » 14 Oct 2020, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑
LOL! Huey nailed you. You start your usual bantor with incessant questions, then he answers your questions, and you get stuck because he stopped your questions. So **** easy.
1. you'll ask a question
2. lie and project as usual. (technically, these two are the same with you, so I'll be putting them together.)
Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ Ask around and see if anyone gives a **** what you think, Vag....
All the RussianRepublican whores are trained the same way.Vegas » 14 Oct 2020, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑
LOL! Huey nailed you. You start your usual bantor with incessant questions, then he answers your questions, and you get stuck because he stopped your questions. So **** easy.
1. you'll ask a question
2. lie and project as usual. (technically, these two are the same with you, so I'll be putting them together.)
Vegas » 14 Oct 2020, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ What's with you and your disciple @Crazytrain ? His posts are almost identical with yours. Not to mention he is only reading 6 words tops as well.
You are training him well. He is becoming as good as an evader, liar, and coward as you.
@Blackvegetable your other disciple is doing a piss poor job in making her lies sound convincing. She just described you to the letter.Isabel » 14 Oct 2020, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑
Change the subject.
Demand proof that they won't read, to waste the opponents' time.
Accuse democrats of whatever the cons are doing.
Ask endless questions, but never answer any.
and, of course:
Lielielielielielielielielielielielielie.
They are all very obedient and well-trained by their masters.