Liberal Forum

Isabel » 14 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm

LOLOL. Just look at you dance away from your *******, busted propaganda lie!!

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm

The most noticeable difference is that the civilian AR15 lower receiver does not have the third trigger pin hole for the auto sear above the safety selector. The trigger pocket is also typically milled to different dimensions to prevent the acceptance of an auto-sear as well. However, this is not a rule. Many companies still sell their lowers with M16 trigger pocket dimensions, they are just missing the proverbial "third-hole".Drilling that third hole is what legally changes your AR-15 from a semi-automatic rifle, into an illegal machine gun.

ibid.

I decline to discuss reframe...

Stop "telling" me things, coward...

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:07 pm

If you want to be that LITERAL....

**** idiot...

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm

what question?

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 3:30 pm

He does that with his famous academic survey that was taken BEFORE trump completed 1 year.  In it is said that this was taken in Trumps first year and like others his ranking could change after 4 years.  The after that he switched to sienna poll where he was making the case Trump was the worst yet that poll did not have trump at the bottom.  I told him he could stop talking about his academics poll because the sienna source trumped it.  

See what I did there?  

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 10:50 am

The first sentence of your effort to deflect from the dissection of your dumbassery is illiterate gibberish again.  The second sentence ignores the fact that as my groupie you are the one concerned with trying to impress me.  I don't need to show your dumb *** anything, and I am unimpressed by parroted cliches and clumsy deflections.  Lastly, if you could do issues or facts with any skill, you would not be using this impotent flailing to run from my demolition of your last squawkery.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 11:13 am

More empty self-fellatio.  Dirty job, but it's not like anybody else is gonna do it.

And yes, I finally gave you a bit of the attention you crave, taking apart another of your catapulted cliches, without it being a response to your pathetic ankle gumming, and that is such an unusual occurrence you believe it has brought meaning to your sad life, when it is really just another of your clumsy deflections from the demolition of your latest parroted idiocy. 

Oh, and before you squeak a bluff about the above being a run-on sentence, you might remember all the other times you've had to run like a Hooey after being asked to back up your alligator mouth with something besides your hummingbird asshole.

RickyTavy » 14 Oct 2020, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:49 am

The more-people-are-killed-with-knives argument is a cliched false syllogism that is only parroted anymore by the most easily suckered Deplorables.  There are several things wrong with Hooey's squawking that you parroted.  These include the fact that Hooey isolated it to rifles when there are efforts to "control" all kinds of guns, and the fact that knives have many uses, while nobody ever uses a rifle or gun to slice a tomato. 

Rampant gun fetishism is just part of an irrational reaction seen in many Deplorables to the erosion of white male privilege.  In my dad's day, men were men.  They didn't need to pose and bluster.  They certainly didn't carry a big iron on their hip while picking up a gallon of milk at the grocery.  They didn't dress up to play army, hoping a bunch of wheezing, beer-bellied sissies would be intimidating.  They didn't all wear those vagina-pube beards.  Now, every victim-wannabe rightard on the planet is engaged in chronic over-compensation.  We can see this even in the way internet Deplorables favor macho avatars and use homosexual insults in the mistaken belief that will keep their closet doors locked.  In the end only sissy boys react with the kind of hysteria seen in the trump cult at the prospect of reasonable gun control.  They see common sense sanity as a threat to what is left of their shrinking penii.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 11:30 am

You declaring the demolition of your parroted stupidity is "nothing" does not address the issues I brought  up that you ducked.  You did not address how I showed the cliche comparing a rifle to a knife is simple-minded  You did not address how restricting your silly bleat to rifles rather than all guns is just you trying and failing to create a straw man small enough that even you can beat it up.  You discovered some time back that weapons called "assault rifles" are really just "assault-STYLE rifles," designed to appeal to weaklings who hope a military-looking rifle will make their dicks bigger, and you are so proud of that learning that big of common knowledge you take every opportunity to show it off.  You hope it will make up for how the other kids got gold stars from the teacher, but you were too stupid to get any.   Instead, you flailed and ran.

You cannot just dismiss reality by running like a Hooey.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 3:57 pm

We will find out....

In each instance an AR 15 style weapon is used in a shooting how few people are killed, on average?

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 3:59 pm

How is that talking about something else?

It was assault rifles vs. edged objects...

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:02 pm

lets start over. all of this seems to be going way over your head. You know all those 'scary' looking rifles that liberals want to ban? and they call them 'assault weapons'? they actually are very rarely used in crime and there are very few homocides per year. The comparison with knives was just for perspective on how very rare 'scary rifle' homicides are. You seem to be hung up on hueys choice for that comparison but i dont know why. He couldve compared scary rifle homocide to lightning strikes i guess.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:05 pm

No, semi automatic sports rifles vs knives and cutting objects.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 11:30 am

You declaring the demolition of your parroted stupidity is "nothing" does not address the issues I brought  up that you ducked.  You did not address how I showed the cliche comparing a rifle to a knife is simple-minded  You did not address how restricting your silly bleat to rifles rather than all guns is just you trying and failing to create a straw man small enough that even you can beat it up.  You discovered some time back that weapons called "assault rifles" are really just "assault-STYLE rifles," designed to appeal to weaklings who hope a military-looking rifle will make their dicks bigger, and you are so proud of that learning that big of common knowledge you take every opportunity to show it off.  You hope it will make up for how the other kids got gold stars from the teacher, but you were too stupid to get any.   Instead, you flailed and ran.

You cannot just dismiss reality by running like a Hooey.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm

I decline to discuss reframe...

Stop "telling" me things, coward...

You need a sear for that and possibly a lower.  The sear can only be purchased thru a class 3 FFL.ATF Ruling 81-4In 1981, ...
 

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 11:18 am

I discussed the topic.  I showed the dumbassery of your false syllogism.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am

According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/20 ... able-8.xls

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 11:39 am

And, here is a bit more of the "nothing" you ran from like a Hooey:

"He limited it to rifles, because mommy recently let him buy a gun, and he likes to pretend in cyberspace that his copy-and-pasting of pro-gun crap makes him a firearms expert.  No "liberal" I know says that restricting rifles only will fix things, so you and Hooey are trying to build a straw man tiny enough that even weenies like you can beat it up.  And, you are still left dodging the point that even if it were only rifles, you are still left with the false syllogism of comparing knives, tools with many uses and ubiquitous existence, to rifles owned by a smaller percentage of people for limited use.  The apt comparison would be one which examined how many times knives were used for deadly purpose vs. how many times guns were.  In the end the problem you fetishists have is that there is no gun that will turn four inches into six."

Here's some more.  When was the last time you saw a mass knifing that killed in double digits?  Assault-style rifles, OTOH, are the favorite tool of the demented.  They are superior only in the way the unskilled can kill more people easily and rapidly.  They are inferior tools for hunting, superior only in the way their appearance makes the impotent and angry feel manly.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm

areas of expertise like using women and children and sexually deviant repulsiveness