Liberal Forum

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:10 pm

I'd ask you to show where you mentioned any of that in your OP, but I'm afraid that you had to run even harder from your bluffs and idiocy, your feeble *** collapse.

According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm

Another weak bluff.  The article does not say those rifles are better for hunting.  It describes which of the inferior rifles for hunting are better than other inferior rifles for hunting.

If you were something other than a simple-minded parrot, you would be aware of the common knowledge that bolt-action rifles are much superior in accuracy (among other factors) to semi-autos you are talking about.  Alas, Polly, ...

Do you possess any reading skills whatsoever?  I did not say they were better. You are busted lying yet again.  But, if you had bothered to read any of the article you might have come acrfoss this:

This is because the qualities that make AR rifles so successful as a military design also make them highly capable as hunting firearms. Many models boast sub-MOA accuracy right out of the box, with some variants featuring performance that rivals that of custom target rifles. What follows is our list of the top 30 ARs, which we have broken down into three categories: Big Game Hunting, Varmint Hunting, and Personal Defense.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:21 pm

Nope.  You're just too boring.
 

The rest was too boring.

You may remove your head from my lap and go away.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:29 pm

Another weak bluff.  You responded to my fact that assault-style rifles are inferior weapons for hunting by posting an article that says they can be "capable."  You were caught not yet having learned another bit of common knowledge you could parrot proudly.

Keep running, Polly.

Again, your lack of reading skills is on display.  AGAIN Here is what the article said

This is because the qualities that make AR rifles so successful as a military design also make them highly capable as hunting firearms. Many models boast sub-MOA accuracy right out of the box, with some variants featuring performance that rivals that of custom target rifles. What follows is our list of the top 30 ARs, which we have broken down into three categories: Big Game Hunting, Varmint Hunting, and Personal Defense.

Now very carefully read that, sound out the words.  HIGHLY CAPABLE as hunting firearms.  That does not say CAN BE.  Jeez dude, no wonder you rarely post about issues and stick to nonsense.  And they pay attention to the the next highlighted comment-with some variants featuring performance that rivals that of custom target rifles

You might want to back out of this conversation.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 3:54 pm

Why is that of any relevance?

But since you're feeling chatty....let's make the issue the number of people killed per "episode"...

How is that Sporting Implement vs. Melonballer "argument" looking now?

I couldn't resist!  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_school_massacre

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:47 pm

"Capable" is a rebuttal to "inferior" only if you are a poorly educated, semi-literate, flailing Hooey bluffer.

Keep runing.

LMAO!  The dude LIES even in the face of what a citation really says.

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:53 pm

No, more self-fellatio and a girly giggle does not enhance a weak bluff.  Capable does not rebut inferior, unless you are a semi-literate Hooey.

You mean to say HIGHLY capable.  You need to keep reading that passage.  Did you and BV take the same reading classes?

RickyTavy » 15 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm

Now, you are just boring.  "Highly capable" does not rebut "inferior" either, illiterate feeble.  It just means it can do the job. A bow and arrow is highly capable of killing a deer.  You are occasionally capable of constructing a simple sentence, but you are still inferior.

LMAO!  

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:23 pm

That is a Ruger Mini 14.Fires 5.56 and can hold a 30 round magazine.  Semi automatic.

Then we have this:



Guess what that is? That is a Ruger Mini 14.Fires 5.56 and can hold a 30 round magazine.  Semi automatic.

Both functionally are the **** same.  The same **** weapon.  Yet, you want to ban one because you are not knowledgeable on the subject and believe the propaganda.  One is a standard looking hunting rifle.  One is dressed up to look military.  You want to ban that one because it looks scary.

Game.  Set.  Match.

@Blackvegetable

Speaking hymen why you running?

@Blackvegetable  
 

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:33 pm

Speaking hymen why you running?

@Blackvegetable

What am I "running from" now, "No Questions for You, Spoon"?

Oh....wait....


This is awkward...
 

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 12:33 pm

Again, your lack of reading skills is on display.  AGAIN Here is what the article said

This is because the qualities that make AR rifles so successful as a military design also make them highly capable as hunting firearms. Many models boast sub-MOA accuracy right out of the box, with some variants featuring performance that rivals that of custom target rifles. What follows is our list of the top 30 ARs, which we have broken down into three categories: Big Game Hunting, Varmint Hunting, and Personal Defense.

Now very carefully read that, sound out the words.  HIGHLY CAPABLE as hunting firearms.  That does not say CAN BE.  Jeez dude, no wonder you rarely post about issues and stick to nonsense.  And they pay attention to the the next highlighted comment-with some variants featuring performance that rivals that of custom target rifles

You might want to back out of this conversation.

This is because the qualities that make AR rifles so successful as a military design also make them highly capable as hunting firearms

"A military design"?

Will someone please fashion this demented dwarf a duct tape snood, with drawstrings?

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2020, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:35 pm

What am I "running from" now, "No Questions for You, Spoon"?

Oh....wait....

This is awkward...

The fact that you fear weapons that look scary and ignore functionality.  I just posted two pics of weapons that have the same functionality and are both Ruger Mini 14s.  One looks scary and you wish to ban it.  The other looks like a traditional hunting rifle although it functions EXACTLY the same as the scary one you would accept that one.

Because it completely dismisses your argument you will play dumb, claim it is not clear, or ignore it.

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm

The fact that you fear weapons that look scary and ignore functionality.  I just posted two pics of weapons that have the same functionality and are both Ruger Mini 14s.  One looks scary and you wish to ban it.  The other looks like a traditional hunting rifle although it functions EXACTLY the same as the scary one you would accept that one.

Because it completely dismisses your argument you will play dumb, claim it is not clear, or ignore it.

The fact that you fear weapons that look scary

Show me where I do so...

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm

"A military design"?

Will someone please fashion this demented dwarf a duct tape snood, with drawstrings?

It does not say designed battlefield use.   I knew when you saw it your would be attracted to it like a moth to a porch light.  They do not the same as military rifles all though they look them.  '

Now, I am still  willing to entertain your posts explaining how a semi auto sport rifle has the function as a battlefield weapon.  That is something you are afraid do. 

I also note with the rapid fire way your notifications are rolling in you are not reading what I write 

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm

Show me where I do so...

Your support of banning of them. 

Still running from this:

Now, I am still  willing to entertain your posts explaining how a semi auto sport rifle has the function as a battlefield weapon.  That is something you are afraid do

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:42 pm

It does not say designed battlefield use.   I knew when you saw it your would be attracted to it like a moth to a porch light.  They do not the same as military rifles all though they look them.  '

Now, I am still  willing to entertain your posts explaining how a semi auto sport rifle has the function as a battlefield weapon.  That is something you are afraid do. 

I also note with the rapid fire way your notifications are rolling in you are not reading what I write

It does not say designed battlefield use.     '

Did the military ask that it be designed for use as a farm implement?

I knew when you saw it your would be attracted to it like a moth to a porch light.  They do not the same as military rifles all though they look them.

But it didn't make you wonder why your Talking Points are in constant conflict with your citations...

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm

Your support of banning of them. 

Still running from this:

Now, I am still  willing to entertain your posts explaining how a semi auto sport rifle has the function as a battlefield weapon.  That is something you are afraid do

So, you can't...

And now I must, for some reason, indulge your irrelevant diversion..
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2020, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:47 pm

So, you can't...

And now I must, for some reason, indulge your irrelevant diversion..

That is not a diversion.  Your claim is that all semi auto sports rifles need to be banned because they look like military weapons and my rebuttal squashes your belief.

I just proved that with the Min Ruger 14 display.

Can you do this or not?

Now, I am still  willing to entertain your posts explaining how a semi auto sport rifle has the function as a battlefield weapon.  That is something you are afraid do

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 1:50 pm

That is not a diversion.  Your claim is that all semi auto sports rifles need to be banned because they look like military weapons and my rebuttal squashes your belief.

I just proved that with the Min Ruger 14 display.

Can you do this or not?

Now, I am still  willing to entertain your posts explaining how a semi auto sport rifle has the function as a battlefield weapon.  That is something you are afraid do

Where did you go @Blackvegetable  

Huey » 15 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm

Where did you go @Blackvegetable

Your claim is that all semi auto sports rifles need to be banned because they look like military weapons

No, it isn't...

I guess you can apologize for asserting "victory".