Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:19 pm

Again.

Show me a photo of a Rambocosplayer sporting a Sporter and we can talk about it.

Expalin what a Rambcosplayer in the context of the discussion.  But you just inadvertently showed your lack of knowledge of the subject.  The majority of what you posted is about the SPORTER, moron.

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:21 pm

Explain what any of that has to do with what it was DESIGNED for..

The AR 15 Sporter was designed for CIVILIAN and Police use.  How many times do I have to tell you that?

Posted a few minutes ago:

[8]Colt continued to use the AR-15 trademark for its line of semi-automatic-only rifles marketed to civilian and law-enforcement customers, known as Colt AR-15.

More proof you do not read what is posted.

@Vegas  

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:24 pm

The AR 15 Sporter was designed for CIVILIAN and Police use.  How many times do I have to tell you that?

Posted a few minutes ago:

[8]Colt continued to use the AR-15 trademark for its line of semi-automatic-only rifles marketed to civilian and law-enforcement customers, known as Colt AR-15.

More proof you do not read what is posted.

@Vegas  

He reads 5 or 6 words, then replies. Of course, after we already post something that he didn't read, he will demand that you repost it. Pure idiot.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm

Expalin what a Rambcosplayer in the context of the discussion.  But you just inadvertently showed your lack of knowledge of the subject.  The majority of what you posted is about the SPORTER, moron.

Limit your "color coverage"...you're a moron...


Let me dumb it down for you...

For the "Sporter" model featured in your photos, what percentage of the category (in terms of sales) does it represent? 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:40 pm

Limit your "color coverage"...you're a moron...

Let me dumb it down for you...

For the "Sporter" model featured in your photos, what percentage of the category (in terms of sales) does it represent?

I have not posted a picture of the Sporter.  Can you show me that?  You really don't read, do you?  

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:39 pm

He reads 5 or 6 words, then replies. Of course, after we already post something that he didn't read, he will demand that you repost it. Pure idiot.

He just did it again.

 
 

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:42 pm

He just did it again.

He does it on purpose. He wants to get people to jump through rings for him. That's why he demands others to go back through threads and repost things. I wont do that. He is a coward.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:41 pm

I have not posted a picture of the Sporter.  Can you show me that?  You really don't read, do you?

viewtopic.php?p=1076792

But let's not linger...

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[3] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[4][5][6] The first mass production version was the Colt AR-15 Sporter,


There is the direct design lineage...

We're done here, Verbal.....again....

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:57 pm

viewtopic.php?p=1076792

But let's not linger...

Due to financial problems, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design and the AR-15 trademark along with the ArmaLite AR-10 to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959.[3] Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[4][5][6] The first mass production version was the Colt AR-15 Sporter,

There is the direct design lineage...

We're done here, Verbal.....again....

Semi automatic beng the key word.  Plus I have also posted the actual parts that had to be redesigned.  You are losing.  You know that right?  But what you can do is articulate in plain english why you want semi automatic weapons banned.

Not sure what that link is for......I have not posted a pic of the sporter on this thread.
 

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:24 pm

The AR 15 Sporter was designed for CIVILIAN and Police use.  How many times do I have to tell you that?

Posted a few minutes ago:

[8]Colt continued to use the AR-15 trademark for its line of semi-automatic-only rifles marketed to civilian and law-enforcement customers, known as Colt AR-15.

More proof you do not read what is posted.

@Vegas  

Just a reminder...

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm

Semi automatic beng the key word.  Plus I have also posted the actual parts that had to be redesigned.  You are losing.  You know that right?  But what you can do is articulate in plain english why you want semi automatic weapons banned.

Not sure what that link is for......I have not posted a pic of the sporter on this thread.

 You are losing.  You know that right? 

I don't see how....citations continue to confirm that the AR15 was designed for the battle field....

But what you can do is articulate in plain english why you want semi automatic weapons banned.

I haven't said that I want "semi automatic weapons banned" I have explained why I want weapons DESIGNED for use in combat banned for civilian possession and sale...
Not sure what that link is for......I have not posted a pic of the sporter on this thread.

Not sure what that link is for......I have not posted a pic of the sporter on this thread.

Did you click on it, ****?

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:02 pm

Just a reminder...

@Blackvegetable

It makes no reference to design....

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm

I don't see how....citations continue to confirm that the AR15 was designed for the battle field....

I haven't said that I want "semi automatic weapons banned" I have explained why I want weapons DESIGNED for use in combat banned for civilian possession and sale...
Not sure what that link is for......I have not posted a pic of the sporter on this thread.

Did you click on it, ****?

Citations where you leave key elements such as the Armalite weapon was rebranded the M 16.  

Weapons designed for use in contact are banned or if manufactured before 86 heavily restricted. The Colt At 15 sporter, as continuously posted was designed for civilians and cops.  Today’s AR variants are simply semi auto sports weapons.  And as you say should not be banned.

There is no sporter pic on this thread.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm

It makes no reference to design....

Again, if it was designed for combat why was it not marketed military instead of the M 16?  

 

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:23 pm

 
Citations where you leave key elements such as the Armalite weapon was rebranded the M 16. The Colt At 15 sporter, as continuously posted was designed for civilians and cops.  Today’s AR variants are simply semi auto sports weapons.  And as you say should not be banned.

There is no sporter pic on this thread.

Citations where you leave key elements such as the Armalite weapon was rebranded the M 16.

Irrelevant...and I don't....

.
Weapons designed for use in contact are banned or if manufactured before 86 heavily restricted. The Colt At 15 sporter, as continuously posted was designed for civilians and cops.

No...not "designed for"....Military weapons may be, but not those designed for combat, as the AR15 and M16 INDISPUTABLY were...you cannot legally purchase the military VARIANTS, but you can buy the design..

And as you say should not be banned.

As long as they have, and were designed specifically for, sporting applications...

and no...sitting in a lawnchair firing off a few hundred rounds doesn't qualify as "sport"...
 

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:24 pm

Again, if it was designed for combat why was it not marketed military instead of the M 16?

Because it was modified to comply with law in order to be sold to civilians...

but it is NOT a different design, which is why it is called a "variant".

Do you know what "variant" means?

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm

Irrelevant...and I don't....

No...not "designed for"....Military weapons may be, but not those designed for combat, as the AR15 and M16 INDISPUTABLY were...you cannot legally purchase the military VARIANTS, but you can buy the design..

As long as they have, and were designed specifically for, sporting applications...

and no...sitting in a lawnchair firing off a few hundred rounds doesn't qualify as "sport"...

 

Irrelevant...and I don't....

It is relevant because you don't grasp the fact that the Armalite 15 did not become the Sporter.  The M 16 was the Armalite 15.  Colt simply used the name.

No...not "designed for"....Military weapons may be, but not those designed for combat, as the AR15 and M16 INDISPUTABLY were...you cannot legally purchase the military VARIANTS, but you can buy the design..

The AR 15 variants posted to this forum were not designed for combat.  The Armalite 15 was but that was rebranded the M 16, not the Sporter.  The modern day AR 15s are not designed for combat either.   The Henry 45 Colt I posted a pic was SPECIFICALLY designed for combat.  Should that be banned?

As long as they have, and were designed specifically for, sporting applications...

and no...sitting in a lawnchair firing off a few hundred rounds doesn't qualify as "sport"...

Like the Original Sporter they are not designed for combat.  If they were they would be marketed to the military.  

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:32 pm

Because it was modified to comply with law in order to be sold to civilians...

but it is NOT a different design, which is why it is called a "variant".

Do you know what "variant" means?

Modified is the wrong word.  The inner workings that made the M 16 a battlefield had to be completely redesigned.  You had inner workings that were completely different in a shell that looked like an M 16.  Again, back to appearance

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm

Modified is the wrong word.  The inner workings that made the M 16 a battlefield had to be completely redesigned.  You had inner workings that were completely different in a shell that looked like an M 16.  Again, back to appearance

Verbal,

Why are you getting jiggy with semantics?

In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features.


Colt didn't REDESIGN the weapon.......

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm

Modified is the wrong word.  The inner workings that made the M 16 a battlefield had to be completely redesigned.  You had inner workings that were completely different in a shell that looked like an M 16.  Again, back to appearance

You didn't answer the question