Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:54 pm

You challenged me to show you your evasions..

I've done so.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:53 pm

Dubass, not all AR manufactures make the same weapon for the military.  So that does not mean they accommodating anything. Nod if you understand.  Next, *******, go back to that list of parts of that had to be redesigned for the Sporter so it could be a civilian weapon.  Nod if you understand.  

 The following is a redesign:

In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[20] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[21] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[22]

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm

Now you are lying and deflecting. You are using your own evasions as a footstool to point down at me. So easy. So **** easy...come on man. Step it up.

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:54 pm

You challenged me to show you your evasions..

I've done so.

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm

In each instance you failed to answer the question put to you...

You evaded....turtled up..

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm

In each instance you failed to answer the question put to you...

You evaded....turtled up..

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:01 pm

Huey didn't put a question to me. He put it to you. In each instance, you failed to answer the question put to you...

You evaded...man up. 

How many times will I need to say that Huey asked you and n ot me? yet, you still wont answer Huey. You will continue to blame me?

**** narcissists. You guys are all the same.
1. You will evade by turning it around on me again.
2. You will ignore that Huey asked you.

He put it to you. In each instance, you failed to answer the question put to you...

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:36 pm

No...

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:23 pm

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 10:32 am

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 10:29 am

I've never put anyone on Ignore..

I just don't see the point of poking some ****** who turtles right up.

Yet, you cannot demonstrate how I have ever turtled up....but look how many times I have shown you evade. 

By the way, where are your apaths this morning? They haven't dropped by to do their habitual belly-aching at me as usual. 


 

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:07 pm

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm

If you have the answer, post it...if not, shut the **** up and crawl back into your hole...

He was asking you *******. You evaded like usual. It's textbook with you.  I dare you to give Huey a straight answer for once. I don't think you can, but let's see it. 

Coward.


 

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:11 pm

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm

Answer or **** off....

Oh Look, Veghead trying to pawn it off again. The question was to you, you wont answer because you are a coward. 

Evade evade evade...question question question...evade evade evade....that's all you do. 

Coward. Coward. Coward.

1. you will not take responsibility by turning it on me again. Coward.


 

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm

Whose question?

Why are you here?

LOL! 
Stupid ***. Coward.
 


 

See any answers?

Me neither...

 

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:12 pm

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:58 pm

In each instance you failed to answer the question put to you...

You evaded....turtled up..

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm

No...stupid..

If a military weapon is modified for civilian use, it is a military weapon modified for civilian use.....not a trowel.

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:40 pm

 

Vegas » 16 Oct 2020, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:45 pm

All this, and you still wont answer Huey's question. Stalling...as usual. 

Coward.

1. you will deflect.
2. Blame your evasion on me.

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm

No...stupid..

If a military weapon is modified for civilian use, it is a military weapon modified for civilian use.....not a trowel.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:52 pm

As I just showed it was redesigned.  It was rebuilt.  It is no longer a weapon for battlefield.

This argument shows you are an average guy of aver intelligence with an average IQ and average lifestyle.

people with less than you got understand the concept.

As I just showed it was redesigned

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 3:54 pm

no...you have never shown that....you have shown that it was modified.....

no citation supports your implication that the AR15 sold to Rambocosplayers is from a discreet design....

EVERY citation tells you that it is a semi-auto version of the M16.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:01 pm

You cant use the same parts idiot.  Read the **** citation Average Guy.  You lose.  Game. Set. **** Match. Not a weapon designed for the battlefield idiot.  

 Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass, the buffer spring is heavier. On the select-fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when the automatic fire is selected.[54] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option (this requires a registered part with the ATF). Lower receivers that are select-fire are identified by a pinhole above the safety/mode selection switch.[55][56][57][58] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select-fire components.[

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:03 pm

you just listed a bunch of MODIFICATIONS.......

Verbal,

You suck at English.....

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:08 pm

Those aren’t modifications.  But call it whatever your mind of average intelligent wants.

Once you redesigned those parts you and assembled them in a new lower receiver you have a weapon designed for civilian use.  That weapon is not capable of automatic fire.  It was never marketed for battle field use.  STILL waiting for you tell me why.  

So we are back to your hatred of those who are attracted to that semi auto sports rifle designed for and built for civilian use.  Based on appearance.

So we are back to your hatred of those who are attracted to that semi auto sports rifle designed for and built for civilian use

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm

Yes...they are modifications, Verbal...you're being decimated....again.

No....the attraction is the purpose for which it was designed...the modification is like the condom.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 4:15 pm

redesigned bolt carrier.

Redesigned lower.

Redesigned hammer.

Redesigned disconnected.

Redesigned Selectir.  

all of that is what makes a rifle battle ready or for civilian use.

it is Not and never has been a weapon for the batt field.

Why didn’t the military use it for the battlefield.  Keep running from that lil ******.

Why didn’t the military use it for the battlefield.  Keep running from that lil ******.