Liberal Forum

Vegas » 14 Oct 2020, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 9:36 am

@Blackvegetable  your other disciple is doing a piss poor job in making her lies sound convincing. She just described you to the letter.

Isabel » 14 Oct 2020, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:04 am

"Ooh hoo HOO! Am NOT!  Am NOT!! HE is! HE is that thing you just said to me!"

LOLOL

I forgot:
Brainlessly repeat what others say about you back to them.

LOL

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 8:50 am

Hold on, Stupid...

My point doesn't need to be "sourced", it is derived from your "argument"....

You think asserting something stupid, and linking to unrelated twaddle constitutes an "argument".....it doesn't...

Now Neuter Up and find your balks...

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:32 am

everything you are doing here is called pilpul. You are just trying to poison the well based on alleged technicalities.

Hueys point was not mysterious. More people are killed with knives than assault rifles.

Your attempt to respond to that point, however, is very mysterious. You arent even saying he is wrong nor are you suggesting that this piece of trivia is irrelevant somehow.

you are literally saying nothing. arguing for the sake of arguing.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:38 am

I don't know who the **** died and made a dough faced mediocrity the Arbiter of Rhetoric...

You presume his premise "so called assault type weapons = all edged instruments".  It's not only inapt, it's idiotic.

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:40 am

is there a point in there?

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:44 am

There were 2 points in there....

You need a jew to help you...

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:38 am

I don't know who the **** died and made a dough faced mediocrity the Arbiter of Rhetoric...

You presume his premise "so called assault type weapons = all edged instruments".  It's not only inapt, it's idiotic.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:45 am

you presumed to change it because you could not dispute the point.

RickyTavy » 14 Oct 2020, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:49 am

The more-people-are-killed-with-knives argument is a cliched false syllogism that is only parroted anymore by the most easily suckered Deplorables.  There are several things wrong with Hooey's squawking that you parroted.  These include the fact that Hooey isolated it to rifles when there are efforts to "control" all kinds of guns, and the fact that knives have many uses, while nobody ever uses a rifle or gun to slice a tomato. 

Rampant gun fetishism is just part of an irrational reaction seen in many Deplorables to the erosion of white male privilege.  In my dad's day, men were men.  They didn't need to pose and bluster.  They certainly didn't carry a big iron on their hip while picking up a gallon of milk at the grocery.  They didn't dress up to play army, hoping a bunch of wheezing, beer-bellied sissies would be intimidating.  They didn't all wear those vagina-pube beards.  Now, every victim-wannabe rightard on the planet is engaged in chronic over-compensation.  We can see this even in the way internet Deplorables favor macho avatars and use homosexual insults in the mistaken belief that will keep their closet doors locked.  In the end only sissy boys react with the kind of hysteria seen in the trump cult at the prospect of reasonable gun control.  They see common sense sanity as a threat to what is left of their shrinking penii.

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:45 am

no there literally wasnt. you arent even addressing his point at all.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:49 am

Let's see

In unambiguous language, state the point of your thread.

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:52 am

no....he limited it to rifles because liberals to freak out over rifles. It was just for some perspective on how rare rifle deaths are.

very simple.

and blah blah bad people etc. useless words.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:54 am

It seems you are the only one who is having issues.  It is quite simple.  Less are shot with a rifle than get stabbed with a knife.  That also means far less are shot with what you erroneously call an assault rifle because they are counted in the rifle category.

From the OP

According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:57 am

OK...but that's not a point.....it's a "factoid"....

the next question is, how is such a comparison useful....

only as propaganda....

RickyTavy » 14 Oct 2020, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 11:00 am

He limited it to rifles, because mommy recently let him buy a gun, and he likes to pretend in cyberspace that his copy-and-pasting of pro-gun crap makes him a firearms expert.  No "liberal" I know says that restricting rifles only will fix things, so you and Hooey are trying to build a straw man tiny enough that even weenies like you can beat it up.  And, you are still left dodging the point that even if it were only rifles, you are still left with the false syllogism of comparing knives, tools with many uses and ubiquitous existence, to rifles owned by a smaller percentage of people for limited use.  The apt comparison would be one which examined how many times knives were used for deadly purpose vs. how many times guns were.  In the end the problem you fetishists have is that there is no gun that will turn four inches into six.

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:52 am

no....he limited it to rifles because liberals to freak out over rifles. It was just for some perspective on how rare rifle deaths are.

very simple.

and blah blah bad people etc. useless words.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 11:07 am

It is absurd for the effort to be against a particular rifle when far more people are killed by knives and cutting instruments.  Is this because of an unnatural fear of firearms?  Or more likely a political agenda?  Or being fed misinformation and propaganda by politicians and the MSM?

RickyTavy » 14 Oct 2020, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 11:16 am

This is Hooey hoping that another no-pride I-know-you-are of my observations on what a dedicated little groupie of mine he is will deflect from the dissection of yet another of his parroted dumbasseries.  He does it every time I notice his existence beyond responding to his sad begging for my attention.  It is what happens when you deal with someone whose next original thought will be his first.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 11:17 am

Why not answer the original question?

"If I can buy an M-80, why can't I buy a nuclear weapon?( Strictly tactical, of course.) It's just another thing that goes BOOM!"