Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:56 am

AR 15 is a semi automatic variant of which weapon?

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:59 am

Not the question.  The M16 is a full automatic weapon.  Completely different.  The question and refuse to answer is why the AR 15 is not used by combat troops.  The reason being it was not designed for combat.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:18 am

Yes..that is the question..

Now answer it.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:21 am

You First!

Not until you respond to the question that preceded it and make a point. I am not playing your game of answering a question with a question, Askhole,  

you were asked why the semi auto sports rifle is not standard issue for combat troops.  Answer that, make a point, then ask a question.

You First!

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:22 am

No, dwarf...

For some reason it is ALWAYS me..

Answer the question.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:22 am

Sorry, answer the question you were asked first.  Make a point.  Then ask a question.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:54 am

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:47 am

You about to melt down again?

I haven’t  melted down yet.  You ready to explain why a weapon you claim is designed for the battlefield, a semi automatic, is not issued to the troops for combat?  

I can answer.  Because it was designed for civilians.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:56 am

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:54 am

I haven’t  melted down yet.  You ready to explain why a weapon you claim is designed for the battlefield, a semi automatic, is not issued to the troops for combat?  

I can answer.  Because it was designed for civilians.

AR 15 is a semi automatic variant of which weapon?

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:22 am

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:21 am

You First!

Not until you respond to the question that preceded it and make a point. I am not playing your game of answering a question with a question, Askhole,  

you were asked why the semi auto sports rifle is not standard issue for combat troops.  Answer that, make a point, then ask a question.

You First!

No, dwarf...

For some reason it is ALWAYS me..

Answer the question.

 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:26 am

That is why it is always you Askhole.  Now answer the question.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:26 am

Answer A question...

We spent yesterday indulging you....now the bill is due..

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:28 am

No...it is always me because you are a coward.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:28 am

I posted the quotes from this morning.  You owe me an answer before asking another.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:33 am

No...I don't owe you ****..

You chased me to answer every one of your posts...stalking me with notifications...even demanding questions be answered more than once..

As you are doing now.

Answer the question.

Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm

Although I have posted this for you in the past I will do it again simply for the entertainment value of watching you fail:

Most current fully automatic trigger groups will not fit their semi-automatic firearm look-alike counterparts – the semi-automatic version is specifically constructed to reject the fully automatic trigger group by adding metal in critical places. This addition is required by ATF to prevent easy conversion of Title I firearms into machine guns.For civilian possession, all machine guns must have been manufactured and registered with ATF prior to May 19, 1986 to be transferable between citizens.[19] These machine gun prices have drastically escalated in value, especially items like registered sears and conversion-kits. Only a Class-II manufacturer (a FFL holder licensed to manufacture firearms or Type-07 license that has paid a Special Occupational Tax Stamp or SOT) could manufacture machine guns after that date, and they can only be sold to government, law-enforcement, and military entities. Transfer can only be done to other SOT FFL-holders, and such FFL-holders must have a "demonstration letter" from a respective government agency to receive such machine guns.[20] Falsification and/or misuse of the "demo-letter" process can and has resulted in long jail sentences and felony convictions for violators.
And:

The domestic manufacture of new machine guns that civilians could purchase was effectively banned by language in the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 (also known as "McClure-Volkmer"). The language was added in an amendment from William J. Hughes and referred to as the Hughes Amendment.[41] Machine guns legally registered prior to the date of enactment (i.e. May 1986) are still legal for possession by and transfer among civilians where permitted by state law. The static and relatively small number of transferable machine guns has caused their price to rise, often over $10,000, although transferable Mac-10 and Mac-11 submachine guns can still be purchased for around $8,000.[42][43] Machine guns manufactured after the FOPA's enactment can be sold only to law enforcement and government agencies, exported, or held as inventory or "dealer samples" by licensed manufacturers and dealers. Machine guns made after 1986 for law enforcement but not transferable to civilian registration are usually priced only a few hundred dollars more than their semi-automatic counterparts, whereas a pre-Hughes Amendment registered machine gun that can be legally transferred commands a huge premium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act

As far as the Henry it was release in 1860 which means it was designed in the 1850s for the military of that time.  Pick a conflict pre 1900 and you plug it in as an answer.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:32 am

You ran from a question as you always do.

The original Colt Sporter is a look alike version of the Original M16.  Later models had shorter barrels, different ammunition, different throat.  

Their is your answer.  Now be a man and tell me why the semi automatic AR 15 is not standard issue for combat?  FInd those balls!

Their is your answer. 

Now be a man and tell me why the semi automatic AR 15 is not standard issue for combat? 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:36 am

@Blackvegetable

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:36 am

"Their" is my answer to what?

Tell me what it has to do with the question of design, and I will.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:32 am

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:28 am

No...it is always me because you are a coward.

You ran from a question as you always do.

The original Colt Sporter is a look alike version of the Original M16.  Later models had shorter barrels, different ammunition, different throat.  

Their is your answer.  Now be a man and tell me why the semi automatic AR 15 is not standard issue for combat?  FInd those balls!

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:37 am

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:36 am

@Blackvegetable

Just answer the question
 

 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:34 am

Check your notifications.  You missed a post.  You will find your answer.  Now it is your turn.  That question destroys your argument.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:39 am

Answered.  Now, just answer the question.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:56 am

AR 15 is a semi automatic variant of which weapon?