Liberal Forum

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:12 am

It is not a pointless question Mr 800.  Your argument is the AR 15 semi automatic is a weapon designed for the battlefield and should be banned.  We have established that weapons in the context of the thread have been banned or so heavily restricted most can't get one.  We have established that the major pieces that make a weapon a combat assault weapon  are redesigned to make it not a combat weapon.  That is no longer a point of contention.  

With that said if you claim it is a weapon for the battlefield you should be able to tell us why the US Government did not Purchase a Semi Automatic weapon as it's primary assault weapon for the troops.  Why haven't they?

Your argument is the AR 15 semi automatic is a weapon designed for the battlefield

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:14 am

What is your point with that?  It does not answer the question as to why the AR 15 Semi automatic rifle is not issued to US combat troops as the standard issue assault rifle?

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:13 am

But the ar15 is not even an assault rifle. You obviously had no idea about the specifics of this round. I had to provide that for you.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:14 am

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:12 am

It is not a pointless question Mr 800.  Your argument is the AR 15 semi automatic is a weapon designed for the battlefield and should be banned.  We have established that weapons in the context of the thread have been banned or so heavily restricted most can't get one.  We have established that the major pieces that make a weapon a combat assault weapon  are redesigned to make it not a combat weapon.  That is no longer a point of contention.  

With that said if you claim it is a weapon for the battlefield you should be able to tell us why the US Government did not Purchase a Semi Automatic weapon as it's primary assault weapon for the troops.  Why haven't they?

Your argument is the AR 15 semi automatic is a weapon designed for the battlefield

Of what system is the AR15 the semi automatic variant?

 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:53 am

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:44 am

This is how **** stupid you are...

The AR 15 is the semi automatic variant of the M16...

For what function was the M16 "designed"?

The M16 s a lightweight, 5.56 mm, air-cooled, gas-operated, magazine-fed assault rifle, with a rotating bolt capable of semi auto and full auto.  It is capable of a cyclic rate of fire of700-950 rounds.  It has a maximum range of 3.600 meters, a maximum effective range of a point target of 550 meters and and a maximum effective range for an area target of 800 meters.  It was designed to be the primary combat weapon for the US Military

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:16 am

Having been found inaccurate in the first instance, why do you now double up?

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:15 am

It doesn't matter if you understand that point, yappy..

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:16 am

Having been found inaccurate in the first instance, why do you now double up?

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:19 am

Inaccurate? The ar15 is not an assault rifle. That is a simple fact.

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:21 am

By definition an assault rifle must have a full auto selector. You clearly know nothing about guns. Why are You arguing about them?

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:19 am

But it does not contain the answer to this:

Could you explain why the AR 15 Semi automatic rifle is not issued to US combat troops as the standard issue assault rifle?

Hint, the answer is in the question.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:24 am

Of which weapons system is the AR15 the semi automatic variant?

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:23 am

Did you take a lot of exctasy back in the day?

You can't progress in a linear fashion or retain context..

You did not break the news that one of the tactical aims of combat is to wound, rather than kill, as this places a greater burden on the enemy..

That you are an ammosexual eager to share your "Musings on Morning Wood" is not particularly relevant; I suggest you engage in that pillow talk **** with dwarf on a dedicated thread.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:25 am

You need to explain the relevance to my argument first..

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:27 am

There you go again with your 'Based on' story.

It is based on the m16. But it is totally not the m16.

Like I said before...it is altered specifically to be less deadly. So it doesn't matter what it is 'Based on'.

There you go again with your 'Based on' story.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:29 am

Because the AR 15 Semi automatic IS NOT a combat weapon, not an assault rifle, and was never designed to one.  As this thread shows.  

Could you explain why the AR 15 Semi automatic rifle is not issued to US combat troops as the standard issue assault rifle?

Hint, the answer is in the question.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:30 am

No...

Of which weapons system is the AR15 a variant?

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:29 am

There you go again with the retelling..

Of which system is the AR 15 a variant?

An unambiguous response, shorn of yap, please.

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 12:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 12:29 am

There are tricks for a person carrying a gun to beat a guy carrying a knife. For example fall to the ground. Increases distance and a person with a knife has a lot longer length to pass to make a fatal injury.

It works 99% of the time.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:28 am

LMAO!  You learned this from what military experience?  That only has merit when you have an enemy that cares about the wounded.  Why do you think so many Japanese had to die during the island hopping campaigns?  They fought to the death.

**** Armchair Soldier.

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:31 am

System? It is a gun...not a system.

It is a rifle made by armalite and based on the m16 which they also made. It is designed for legal civilian use. Ergo it is not as dangerous a weapon as the m16 and it is much cheaper.

It is designed for legal civilian use.