Liberal Forum

The first pic is a VARIANT of the bottom pic.  The top pic is not a high performance sports car.  It does not have the capabilities as the bottom pic. It is the same for AR 15 semi auto.
@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:31 am

Already answered.

now a better question for you is what capabilities do the two weapons platform share?

Show me

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:35 am

The first pic is a VARIANT of the bottom pic.  The top pic is not a high performance sports car.  It does not have the capabilities as the bottom pic. It is the same for AR 15 semi auto.
@Blackvegetable

For what was the original designed?

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:34 am

It is a variant of an existing design.

It is a variant of the exterior.  As already proven the INTERIOR, the parts that make it shoot, were totally redesigned.  

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:36 am

For what was the original designed?

To race.  DOes not make the production car a race car.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:30 am

No...

Of which weapons system is the AR15 a variant?

Externally, the appearance, is a variant of the M16.  Internally, the components that make it shoot are original and not a variant of the M16.  One desgned for combat, the other as proved designed for civilians.

Now first.  What capabilities do the weapons share.  Specific functios.

And if the AR 15 semi auto was designed for the battlefield why is not standard issue to US combat troops?  Are you ever gonna answer that?

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:33 am

I heard first hand accounts of it growing up...not very often, but occasionally..

In what year was the weapons system, of which the AR 15 is the semi automatic variant, developed?

In what year did the War in the Pacific end?

Which number is larger?

Your questions have nothing to do with your comments on military strategy.  Keep diverting Arm Chair Marine

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:41 am

Your questions have nothing to do with your comments on military strategy.  Keep diverting Arm Chair Marine

Thar is meaningless.

You are a moron.

Back to the ruger mini 14 ranch:



It has the function and capabilities as an AR 15 semi automatic weapon.  Yet you do not whine about it.
 
@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:43 am

Thar is meaningless.

You are a moron.

Maybe.  But I know the difference between a weapon designed for combat and one designed for civilians.  You do not.  

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:39 am

Externally, the appearance, is a variant of the M16.  Internally, the components that make it shoot are original and not a variant of the M16.  One desgned for combat, the other as proved designed for civilians.

Now first.  What capabilities do the weapons share.  Specific functios.

And if the AR 15 semi auto was designed for the battlefield why is not standard issue to US combat troops?  Are you ever gonna answer that?

Why do I get all these qualifications?

It's a simple question, with a simple answer..

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:33 am

I heard first hand accounts of it growing up...not very often, but occasionally..

In what year was the weapons system, of which the AR 15 is the semi automatic variant, developed?

In what year did the War in the Pacific end?

Which number is larger?

Also, what matter of great moment occurred in 14 hundred and 92?

And in what part of Spain does rain mainly fall?

Until you have dealt with these questions, dwarf, I win.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:34 am

It is a variant of an existing design.

It's a totally new design really. It is intended for civilian rather than military use therefore it has to be a totally different gun. It is loosely based on the m16 but they are not even in the sameballpark as actual weapons go.

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:44 am

Maybe.  But I know the difference between a weapon designed for combat and one designed for civilians.  You do not.

Obviously not..

Define "designed"..
 

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:45 am

It's a totally new design really. It is intended for civilian rather than military use therefore it has to be a totally different gun. It is loosely based on the m16 but they are not even in the sameballpark as actual weapons go.

No, really...

I'll wait for the book.
 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:44 am

Maybe.  But I know the difference between a weapon designed for combat and one designed for civilians.  You do not.

He's plainly told you that he wants controls on both - and why.

Agree or disagree, his opinion is manifest, and he has a right to it.

His knowledge of the minutia impinges on his right to that opinion not a whit.

You should just call him a *** dicker. You'll feel better, and you'll almost certainly be correct.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:44 am

Why do I get all these qualifications?

It's a simple question, with a simple answer..

You got the answer.  You are not a prosecutor or investigator trying to get the accused boxed in.

What capabilities and functions do the M16 designed for combat and the AR 15 Semi automatic  designed for civilians share?

And if by your argument the AR 15 Semi automatic was designed for the battlefield why was it not standard issue for US combat troops?

Hint; the answer is in the question.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:45 am

No, really...

I'll wait for the book.

There is a reason you can buy an ar15 but not an m16. Kinda like it is legal to buy fireworks but not dynamite

' But they are both designed to explode! '

You have no point.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:45 am

Obviously not..

Define "designed"..

Then, "delighted," and then "divorce."

You have 120 seconds on the clock - go.

FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:48 am

There is a reason you can buy an ar15 but not an m16. Kinda like it is legal to buy fireworks but not dynamite

' But they are both designed to explode! '

You have no point.

To carry forward your analogy, his point is that he wants more controls on both..