Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm

No one said the AR 15 Sporter was.

So what weapon are you arguing about?  That is the first Colt AR 15 produced.  What the **** is your argument?
 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 12:24 pm

All NEW weapons designs have to thru ATF.  Duh. You to have to get approved to ensure they do not fall under the NFA of 1934.

All NEW weapons designs have to thru ATF. 

But the Sporter is not a design....it is a variant..

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:00 pm

But the Sporter is not a design....it is a variant..

Actually the M16 is the variant.  But the Sporter was never designed for the battlefield.

you have unanswered questions to get to.
 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 1:56 pm

So what weapon are you arguing about?  That is the first Colt AR 15 produced.  What the **** is your argument?

Let's go back to basics...

Define "design", and "variant"...

No one is talking about "production".
 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:01 pm

Actually the M16 is the variant.  But the Sporter was never designed for the battlefield.

you have unanswered questions to get to.

What does the citation say?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm

What does the citation say?

I don’t care what your citation says.  You may call it a banana if you want.  You owe answers to these questions:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm

Let's go back to basics...

Define "design", and "variant"...

No one is talking about "production".

Dude, the more you talk, the more you are getting your *** kicked. You are not going to beat Huey on this issue. Normal health minded people have no problem admitting that they don't know everything you narcissistic scumbag.


 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm

I don’t care what your citation says.  You may call it a banana if you want.  You owe answers to these questions:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

I don’t care what your citation says

Then we are done, Verbal...

Cause I, sure as ****, don't give a damn about your yapping.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm

Let's go back to basics...

Define "design", and "variant"...

No one is talking about "production".

your argument is moot.  You just posted you did not say the AR 15 Sporter was designed for the Battlefield.  

1.  IF the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16

You car is a variant of this:


 
Doesn’t make your **** stained 2012 a race car.

now either concede or answer the questions.
 

Vegas » 17 Oct 2020, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:05 pm

Dude, the more you talk, the more you are getting your *** kicked. You are not going to beat Huey on this issue. Normal health minded people have no problem admitting that they don't know everything you narcissistic scumbag.

I'm sure Huey is comforted by the endorsement of a fellow noinfo coward..

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:10 pm

 fellow noinfo coward..

Have you figured out how to put the FY2020 in broader contextual framework yet, or are you just content with the number?

Vegas » 17 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm

Have you figured out how to put the FY2020 in broader contextual framework yet, or are you just content with the number?

"Yet"?

Do you know anything about it at all?

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:13 pm

"Yet"?

Do you know anything about it at all?

Oh look, answering a question with a question. More questions, no answer. Darth evader strikes again.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm

Then we are done, Verbal...

Cause I, sure as ****, don't give a damn about your yapping.

Tap out coward.  You argument has been decimated.  But I have you on record saying the AR 15 is not a weapon designed for the battlefield and that invalidates your argument.

Than you for giving me another glorious victory.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm

Then we are done, Verbal...

Cause I, sure as ****, don't give a damn about your yapping.

Ps.  We have to ban your car.
 
 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm

Ps.  We have to ban your car.

Why?


Wait....don't tell me!


"For The Season Posted Reasons I Voted For Last Time." ?

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm

Tap out coward.  You argument has been decimated.  But I have you on record saying the AR 15 is not a weapon designed for the battlefield and that invalidates your argument.

Than you for giving me another glorious victory.

How, if it is consistent with ALL citations which you have stipulated to disdaining, can my argument POSSIBLY  have been "decimated"?

I'm sure we'll be adding this to the long list of questions you are too.....uhhhh....victorious to answer.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:21 pm

Why?

Wait....don't tell me!

"For The Season Posted Reasons I Voted For Last Time." ?

Define "why?" and define "season", "Posted", "Voted", "Last", and "Time".

Give links, 3 concise bullet points for each definition, and repost all of Huey's comments that had any of these words in it...sift through the thousands of his posts to do so.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm

No one said the AR 15 Sporter was.

here is where you lost.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:24 pm

How, if it is consistent with ALL citations which you have stipulated to disdaining, can my argument POSSIBLY  have been "decimated"?

I'm sure we'll be adding this to the long list of questions you are too.....uhhhh....victorious to answer.

because you refuse to answer these questions less than a man:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Plus, my previous post shows you suddenly claiming the Ar 15 was not designed for the battlefield.