Liberal Forum

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm

On Record the Sporter was produced prior to the M16.  

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

We're done..

You've lost.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm

We're done..

I lost.

Finally, you admit it. 
If you would stop pretending that you know everything , then you wouldn't get so easily embarrassed.

Vegas » 17 Oct 2020, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:59 pm

I admit it. 

I'm an obsessed loser.....I spend every living moment hating on blackvegetable, while at the same time aching to be more like that Playah...

I'm sure you're not alone.

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm

We're done..

You've lost.

I suggest you read the whole post Low IQ.
No, you did.  You, the most who practices braggadocio more than any poster on this forum has run continuously from answering these questions because you are not the man daddy hoped you would be.  You’re a coward.

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

If you can not answer those questions low IQ you can not show why AR 15s should be banned.  You are just another low IQ sheep swallowing propaganda because you are not smart enough to think for yourself.

I have decimated every point you brought up.  To include the variant point.  The M16 is a battlefield variant of the Civilian designed AR 15 considering  the AR 15 Sporter was produced first.  And since it was a CIVILIAN weapon it was never issued as a combat weapon.

GAME.  SET.   MATCH.  

You have also been shown once again to be a liar.

 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm

I suggest you read the whole post Low IQ.
No, you did.  You, the most who practices braggadocio more than any poster on this forum has run continuously from answering these questions because you are not the man daddy hoped you would be.  You’re a coward.

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

If you can not answer those questions low IQ you can not show why AR 15s should be banned.  You are just another low IQ sheep swallowing propaganda because you are not smart enough to think for yourself.

I have decimated every point you brought up.  To include the variant point.  The M16 is a battlefield variant of the Civilian designed AR 15 considering  the AR 15 Sporter was produced first.  And since it was a CIVILIAN weapon it was never issued as a combat weapon.

GAME.  SET.   MATCH.  

You have also been shown once again to be a liar.

Dwarf,

You duck the relevant question, then yap on and on in some deranged monologue that ends in a declaration of victory....over your, we must assume, lesser self.

You've been asked to make your questions relevant to the issue of design..

Can you do so?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:11 pm

Dwarf,

You duck the relevant question, then yap on and on in some deranged monologue that ends in a declaration of victory....over your, we must assume, lesser self.

You've been asked to make your questions relevant to the issue of design..

Can you do so?

Speaking of ducking questions:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

When you make the low IQ comment that the AR 15 was designed for the battlefield because the M16 USA variant of is you should back up your claim by answering those questions.

But, you are not smart enough to go further than the propaganda you have been told to follow.

You are not a smart man.  Hell, you ain’t a man.


 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm

Speaking of ducking questions:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

When you make the low IQ comment that the AR 15 was designed for the battlefield because the M16 USA variant of is you should back up your claim by answering those questions.

But, you are not smart enough to go further than the propaganda you have been told to follow.

You are not a smart man.  Hell, you ain’t a man.

No, dwarf...

Of what relevance are your question to the issue of design?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:16 pm

No, dwarf...

Of what relevance are your question to the issue of design?

Those questions are extremely relevant to the design, which was produced PRIOR to the M16, when your argument is it should be banned because it was designed to be a battlefield weapon.  I’ll try again:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Until you answer those questions that have been asked for hours and days I will answer NONE of your questions low IQ.
 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:18 pm

Those questions are extremely relevant to the design, which was produced PRIOR to the M16, when your argument is it should be banned because it was designed to be a battlefield weapon.  I’ll try again:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Until you answer those questions that have been asked for hours and days I will answer NONE of your questions low IQ.

 

If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed

It wasn't "designed", it was modified from a design.

you can stop asking now, 37x
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:37 pm

It wasn't "designed", it was modified from a design.

you can stop asking now, 37x

How can it be modified from a design when it was produced first?  But, this is your diversion.  Your argument is it is designed for use on the battlefield because it is an M16 variant.  The BATF disagrees with you.  Anyhoo, in order for your argument to be true Low IQ you should be able to answer the questions you have been running from for hours and days.

Those questions are extremely relevant to the design, which was produced PRIOR to the M16, when your argument is it should be banned because it was designed to be a battlefield weapon.  I’ll try again:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Until you answer those questions that have been asked for hours and days I will answer NONE of your questions low IQ

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm

How can it be modified from a design when it was produced first?  But, this is your diversion.  Your argument is it is designed for use on the battlefield because it is an M16 variant.  The BATF disagrees with you.  Anyhoo, in order for your argument to be true Low IQ you should be able to answer the questions you have been running from for hours and days.

Those questions are extremely relevant to the design, which was produced PRIOR to the M16, when your argument is it should be banned because it was designed to be a battlefield weapon.  I’ll try again:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Until you answer those questions that have been asked for hours and days I will answer NONE of your questions low IQ

Because DESIGN precedes PRODUCTION.

You can stop with the stupid now, 37X
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm

Because DESIGN precedes PRODUCTION.

You can stop with the stupid now, 37X

The questions you are cowardly running from:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Im out for the evening LOW IQ.  I’ll check tomorrow to see if you found your manhood, made daddy proud, and acted like a man and answered those questions,

Remember lil coward, your questions were answered. 

You ain’t **** **** Capt Stubing.  Physically or intellectually Mr Townhouse.

 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 5:15 pm

The questions you are cowardly running from:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Im out for the evening LOW IQ.  I’ll check tomorrow to see if you found your manhood, made daddy proud, and acted like a man and answered those questions,

Remember lil coward, your questions were answered. 

You ain’t **** **** Capt Stubing.  Physically or intellectually Mr Townhouse.

The questions are

A) irrelevant

B) irrelevant

Your inability to be relevant, coupled with your cowardice and abysmal literacy, makes you a loser, 37X
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 5:34 pm

The questions are

A) irrelevant

B) irrelevant

Your inability to be relevant, coupled with your cowardice and abysmal literacy, makes you a loser, 37X

 

Remember lil coward, your questions were answered.

You're a lying piece of ****.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 3:02 pm

I'm sure you're not alone.

What's not to hate? LOL

Vegas » 17 Oct 2020, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 8:53 pm

What's not to hate? LOL

The manliness...

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 5:34 pm

The questions are

A) irrelevant

B) irrelevant

Your inability to be relevant, coupled with your cowardice and abysmal literacy, makes you a loser, 37X

Your claim is it is a variant of rifle designed for the battlefield and should be banned although combat weapons themselves are  already banned or so heavily restricted most people can’t get one.

The BATF says it is not a combat weapon.  You refuse to tell us what capabilities it shares with the M16 that make it a combat weapon.  And refuse to tell us why this weapon was never standard combat issue considering it was mass produced BEFORE the M16.  Since you refuse, or more aptly can’t, to give those answers we are left with this:

the appeal is to Rambocosplayers for its look

Since the AR 15 does not share any capabilities or internal parts you want it banned based on appearance.  
 

Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2020, 8:08 am

Your claim is it is a variant of rifle designed for the battlefield and should be banned although combat weapons themselves are  already banned or so heavily restricted most people can’t get one.

The BATF says it is not a combat weapon.  You refuse to tell us what capabilities it shares with the M16 that make it a combat weapon.  And refuse to tell us why this weapon was never standard combat issue considering it was mass produced BEFORE the M16.  Since you refuse, or more aptly can’t, to give those answers we are left with this:

the appeal is to Rambocosplayers for its look

Since the AR 15 does not share any capabilities or internal parts you want it banned based on appearance.

Your claim is it is a variant of rifle designed for the battlefield

That is not a claim, Dwarf..

That is a demonstrated fact..

Learn the difference..

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2020, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2020, 8:13 am

That is not a claim, Dwarf..

That is a demonstrated fact..

Learn the difference..

And what is also a demonstrated fact is the AR15 DOES NOT share any of the capabilities that make the M16 a donation weapon.

Answer these questions honestly and you win:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?
 

Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2020, 8:21 am

And what is also a demonstrated fact is the AR15 DOES NOT share any of the capabilities that make the M16 a donation weapon.

Answer these questions honestly and you win:

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?

Irrelevant..

If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t)

It was never "designed"....IT IS A VARIANT OF AN EXISTING DESIGN.

CONFIRM THAT YOU UNDERSTAND THIS, 37X