Its purpose was for civilian use. So yes, the NFA is relevant gun grabber.Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2020, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ NFA is not relevant to the design or its purpose, Spammy...
No...it isn't..Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Its purpose was for civilian use. So yes, the NFA is relevant gun grabber.
No, the reason that the AR 15 is a non NFA weapon is Colt redesigned all the parts in the lower receiver and the bolt so it would not be Considered a combat weapon. It was specifically designed for civilians. Which capabilities does the weapon have that make it a combat weapon?Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2020, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it isn't..
The design was exempt because it was for a military purpose
Of what weapon design is the AR15 a variant?Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ No, the reason that the AR 15 is a non NFA weapon is Colt redesigned all the parts in the lower receiver and the bolt so it would not be Considered a combat weapon. It was specifically designed for civilians. Which capabilities does the weapon have that make it a combat weapon?
Here is another question you have dodged. If this is a weapon designed for combat since it was mass produced BEFORE the M16 why was it not standard issue for combat?
already answered. A redesigned civilian variant of the M16. Your turn.
Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ already answered. A redesigned civilian variant of the M16. Your turn.
Then it wouldn't be a variant..A redesigned
no sir. I posted all the parts that had to be redesigned. Do I need to do it again? That is not a modification.
Is this what you call a modification? Do you understand what your “modification” (redesign) does?Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ This is more than a modification. It is a whole new internal design:
To prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, several features were changed. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass, the buffer spring is heavier. On the select-fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when the automatic fire is selected.[54] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option (this requires a registered part with the ATF). Lower receivers that are select-fire are identified by a pinhole above the safety/mode selection switch.[55][56][57][58] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select-fire components.[59]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15_style_rifle#:~:text=As%20of%20September%2019%2C%202019,rifle%20across%20the%20firearms%20industry.
That applies to the Colt Sporter. Notice all the parts that had to be changed and redesigned? So no, the Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.
Dwarf,Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Is this what you call a modification? Do you understand what your “modification” (redesign) does?
@Blackvegetable
You've seen it.
Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2020, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You've seen it.
it sends you and your fruity friends into estrus..
Nod if understand what those parts are and what they do. Because the lower receiver and those parts determine the capabilities of a rifle. All of the parts were signed specifically for the civilian market. Those parts are what determine a full automatic battlfield weapon from a semi automatic purpose built for civilians.Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2020, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,
Learn the language
Design
Modification - Variant..
Nod if you understand.
Which capabilities does the weapon have that make it a combat weapon?
Here is another question you have dodged. If this is a weapon designed for combat since it was mass produced BEFORE the M16 why was it not standard issue for combat?
Ask Dwarf
Huey » 18 Oct 2020, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Nod if understand what those parts are and what they do. Because the lower receiver and those parts determine the capabilities of a rifle. All of the parts were signed specifically for the civilian market. Those parts are what determine a full automatic battlfield weapon from a semi automatic purpose built for civilians.
You got questions to answer. If you can answer them you win. No more word games.
They modify the original design.what those parts are and what they do
Where is the auto option for the AR 15 semi auto rifle on the lower receiver?
Now answer the questions.
What is each parts specific purpose? This is how I know you are losing and afraid to admit so.
No, Askhole..
Yours have been answered.