Liberal Forum

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:41 pm

You  brought these citations into the conversation.  You provide yours first.  Support your claim.  This is where you would go 50 posts whining if I allow you.

You know, 37X, I can't help noticing your habit of shameful projection.

https://www.80percentarms.com/blog/ar15 ... ifference/

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am

According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/20 ... able-8.xls

What we really need is *** control. 13% of the population doing half the murdering.

Norkin?

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:12 pm

Did you define "exchange" yet?

Answering a question with a question. Evasion x 3.

You know what I defined. I typed it clear as day. There he goes @Isabel  . Already 3 evasions, and I haven't started yet. Lol.
Hey isabel, you want to see how good I am at predicting him. His next reply will be for me to repost what I said. Lol

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:45 pm

Not relevant.  YOUR words never specified a battlefield.  And that is  the 45 LONG colt, not ACP.

This is a weapon that was specifically designed for battlefield:

Are those your words, Dwarf?

This is where you would go 50 posts whining if I allow you.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 8:31 am

You asked and I answered.  Do you wish to discuss this or are you trolling?
 

Do you GENUINELY believe these are different things with blathe?  
 

Vegas » 14 Oct 2020, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:50 pm

Answering a question with a question. Evasion x 3.

You know what I defined. I typed it clear as day. There he goes @Isabel  . Already 3 evasions, and I haven't started yet. Lol.
Hey isabel, you want to see how good I am at predicting him. His next reply will be for me to repost what I said. Lol

GFY
 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm

You know, 37X, I can't help noticing your habit of shameful projection.

https://www.80percentarms.com/blog/ar15 ... ifference/

So what’s exactly the difference between the M16 or AR15? There’s a lot of misinformation out there, or just information that has been repeated so often that it’s taken as fact. The easiest way to look at it is this: Every M16 is an AR15, but not all AR15s are an M16.Many people will tell you that an AR15 is semi-auto only, and the M16 is full-auto. While this may help for differentiating between the two for civilian purposes, this isn’t at all true. The original AR15 (before it picked up a military name) was fully-automatic, as well as plenty since then. And what most people don’t realize, is that the military has also tested semi-automatic M16s as well, which later earned designations as the famed Mk12 Mod 0.

Thanks.  

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:56 am

No..that's ****...."Assault-style" sporting goods rifles are the most glaring symptom of our irrational approach to ALL private forearms ownership...

One of the issues with these "sporting goods" is the leverage it affords the former sportsman and law abiding gun owner when he gets a hair across his ***.

well this is just like...your opinion dude. The fact remains that more people are killed by knives than rifles. This is a fact that clearly makes you uncomfortable but you havent refuted it.

and wait a second...did i just read you complaining about giving leverage to law abiding people?

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm

Not modified.  Redesigned so they were not battlefield weapons.

If they weren't ever designed to be such, why would they require "redesign"?

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm

Are those your words, Dwarf?

This is where you would go 50 posts whining if I allow you.

Yes.  But NOW you are reframing by specifying a battlefield.  Do you wish to change your thought on this? I can also fire that weapon as fast as a semi automatic sports weapon.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm

GFY

QED. Next...

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 8:36 am

Is this the alpha and omega of your argument?

What is the largest number of people killed by someone wielding a knife?

A lot more than assault rifles, I will wager. Ya don't have to reload a knife.

Unless they run, I guess. Or finish lunch and pay the check while you're on some other guy's carotid.

I gotta know - gone googlin...

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:52 pm

If they weren't ever designed to be such, why would they require "redesign"?

LMAO!  Seriously?  

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:53 pm

Yes.  But NOW you are reframing by specifying a battlefield.  Do you wish to change your thought on this? I can also fire that weapon as fast as a semi automatic sports weapon.

Veghead reframing and being dishonest again? Never.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 8:50 am

Hold on, Stupid...

My point doesn't need to be "sourced", it is derived from your "argument"....

You think asserting something stupid, and linking to unrelated twaddle constitutes an "argument".....it doesn't...

Now Neuter Up and find your balls...
 

The humanity.  

FOS » 14 Oct 2020, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:52 pm

well this is just like...your opinion dude. The fact remains that more people are killed by knives than rifles. This is a fact that clearly makes you uncomfortable but you havent refuted it.

and wait a second...did i just read you complaining about giving leverage to law abiding people?

You argue like a crack ho...

I haven't questioned the factoid, I pissed on the "point"...

Do you understand the difference?

did i just read you complaining about giving leverage to law abiding people?

You should have....Lahwd only knows if it found traction.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:52 pm

If they weren't ever designed to be such, why would they require "redesign"?

Todays weapons that you purchase in gun store or online don't have to be redesigned.  They purpose built SPECIFICALLY for civilians.  Just as the COLT sporter was in 64

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:54 pm

LMAO!  Seriously?

Words, Verbal....consider staying away from them.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm

Todays weapons that you purchase in gun store or online don't have to be redesigned.  They purpose built SPECIFICALLY for civilians.  Just as the COLT sporter was in 64

No...that's "built", Reframy..

We are talking DESIGNED.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm

You argue like a crack ho...

I haven't questioned the factoid, I pissed on the "point"...

Do you understand the difference?

You should have....Lahwd only knows if it found traction.

i dont think you understand his point. It was very simple. Hysteria about assault rifles is unfounded because relatively few people are killed by them.