Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:51 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:49 am

Nope, they are not.  When was the SP1 used on the battlefield?

Post my statement. 

 

 

I have reposted your arguments.  

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:51 am

Give me a narrative version of what you hope to prove with that so I can stomp it.

You can't stomp sultanas, clown

You can't even read.

Post the title of the entry.

Identify the weapon in the middle photo.

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:52 am

I have reposted your arguments.

Don't rephrase them.

Unlike you, I can herd letters.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:54 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:51 am

Give me a narrative version of what you hope to prove with that so I can stomp it.

You can't stomp sultanas, clown

You can't even read.

Post the title of the entry.

Identify the weapon in the middle photo.

 

You are incapable of answering.  But I will do it anyway.

List of Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle variants
Is the title.  The rifle in the middle is a 1973 Sporter, a non military variant semi automatic.  

Variant Definition:
a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

Next, in your source under the MILITARY section that weapon, or any COLT AR 15 (SP1) does  not appear. 

Now, post the MAJOR difference between the weapon in the middle, the first one, and the last one.

I answered your question.  Now it's your turn.   

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:55 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:52 am

I have reposted your arguments.

Don't rephrase them.

Unlike you, I can herd letters.
 

 

I posted your actual quotes.  Not were where you got this rephrase crap from. 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:00 am

You are incapable of answering.  But I will do it anyway.

List of Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle variants
Is the title.  The rifle in the middle is a 1973 Sporter, a non military variant semi automatic.  

Variant Definition:
a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

Next, in your source under the MILITARY section that weapon, or any COLT AR 15 (SP1) does  not appear. 

Now, post the MAJOR difference between the weapon in the middle, the first one, and the last one.

I answered your question.  Now it's your turn.

Tiny, stop.

Your effort to fuse a random definition to a distinct system of taxonomy won't fly.

I really don’t care if you don't understand.

You know so much about the SP1....

Why were the first 45 made?
 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:01 am

I posted your actual quotes.  Not were where you got this rephrase crap from.

When you use my words, you lose.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:06 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:00 am

You are incapable of answering.  But I will do it anyway.

List of Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle variants
Is the title.  The rifle in the middle is a 1973 Sporter, a non military variant semi automatic.  

Variant Definition:
a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

Next, in your source under the MILITARY section that weapon, or any COLT AR 15 (SP1) does  not appear. 

Now, post the MAJOR difference between the weapon in the middle, the first one, and the last one.

I answered your question.  Now it's your turn.

Tiny, stop.

Your effort to fuse a random definition to a distinct system of taxonomy won't fly.

I really don’t care if you don't understand.

You know so much about the SP1....

Why were the first 45 made?
 

 

Sorry, you have a question to answer.  Then you can impress me with your knowledge of why the first 45 were made. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:07 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:01 am

I posted your actual quotes.  Not were where you got this rephrase crap from.

When you use my words, you lose.

 

When you tell me the major difference between the lowers you will never speak of this topic again.  You whine, cry, and lie I don't answer questions.  YOU run from them.

 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:10 am

When you tell me the major difference between the lowers you will never speak of this topic again.  You whine, cry, and lie I don't answer questions.  YOU run from them.

What is it about the consequence of all citations being consistent and unambiguous that you refuse to understand?


 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am

Sorry, you have a question to answer.  Then you can impress me with your knowledge of why the first 45 were made.

No...

Not because you can't handle being COMPLETELY wrong.

Acknowledge what all the citations show, then fall to your scaly knees and proclaim me a demi-god.


Now.

Huey » 14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 7:57 am

According to the UCR, 1,476 victims were murdered with “knives or cutting instruments,” whereas 364 people were killed with rifles, including the vague category of “assault rifles.”

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/20 ... able-8.xls

Don't we already have enough laws regulating knives?

Laws against switchblades - one of my favorite types of knives to collect.

Laws against ballistic knives  - wish I could find a good ballistic knife:

Here's a really cool knife - stab someone and then press the button to inject them with a canister of freezing cold C02 which rapidly expands in the wound. I bet this one hurts like a bitch!


 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am

Sorry, you have a question to answer.  Then you can impress me with your knowledge of why the first 45 were made.

No...I don't.


It's revealing.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:14 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am

Sorry, you have a question to answer.  Then you can impress me with your knowledge of why the first 45 were made.

No...

Not because you can't handle being COMPLETELY wrong.

Acknowledge what all the citations show, then fall to your scaly knees and proclaim me a demi-god.


Now.

 

Answer the question.  What are you afraid of?  DON'T ever post that BS that I do not answer questions. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:27 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am

Sorry, you have a question to answer.  Then you can impress me with your knowledge of why the first 45 were made.

No...I don't.

It's revealing.

Don't ever post that I don't answer questions.  

 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:27 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:09 am

Sorry, you have a question to answer.  Then you can impress me with your knowledge of why the first 45 were made.

No...I don't.


It's revealing.

 

In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[21] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[22] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[23]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

Remember the definition of variant. 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:54 am

In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[21] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[22] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[23]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

Remember the definition of variant.

Which one?

The term of art relevant to the context, or any one of my choosing?

 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:47 am

Don't ever post that I don't answer questions.

Because you insist you do, ZeroIntegrity?

Don't think so.

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:46 am

Answer the question.  What are you afraid of?  DON'T ever post that BS that I do not answer questions.

You don't.

Stop pretending otherwise.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:56 am

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 11:54 am

In order to prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, Colt changed a number of features. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass the buffer spring is heavier. On the select fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when automatic fire is selected.[21] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option.[22] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select fire components.[23]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15

Remember the definition of variant.

Which one?

The term of art relevant to the context, or any one of my choosing?

 

 

The one relative to common usage.  Also, you can use the art o ne because that also specifies a difference.   That post is why you are afraid to talk about the lowers.  

Now, about the first 45.  You will have to fill me in on that one.  I am assuming you have mixed up the model names again.