Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 1:41 pm

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 12:18 pm

Sure.  And by any definition of variant it has been change. But the Colt AR 15 was significantly changed so it was no different in function from any other semiautomatic.  It doesn't shoot faster, the weapon does not make the round anymore powerful, and per the DOD it is not an assault rifle.

So your reason to ban it has been destroyed.

Stop with the inarticulate ****.


 

 

Nothing in articulate about it.  Or ****.  Point out what is ****.

Sure.  And by any definition of variant it has been change. But the Colt AR 15 was significantly changed so it was no different in function from any other semiautomatic.  It doesn't shoot faster, the weapon does not make the round anymore powerful, and per the DOD it is not an assault rifle.

So your reason to ban it has been destroyed.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm

LMAO!

You won't answer because the answer kills your argument.  So what about those first 45?  Not sure what you are talking about.

It isn't just my argument, it is what EVERY CITATION confirms.

It is fact.


 

 

No, all those citations do not confirm your argument or support you reasons for banning it.  All it does is support your whine about variant.  You do not understand what you are reading.  

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm

No, all those citations do not confirm your argument or support you reasons for banning it.  All it does is support your whine about variant.  You do not understand what you are reading.

Yes...they do.


Every one.

Even combat veterans agree.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 2:09 pm

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm

No, all those citations do not confirm your argument or support you reasons for banning it.  All it does is support your whine about variant.  You do not understand what you are reading.

Yes...they do.


Every one.

Even combat veterans agree.

 

Dude, you are full of **** on the issue and have no clue what those citations are telling you.  It is highly entertaining watching you. 

You ready to talk about lowers yet?  

There is nothing special about an AR 15 style weapon that makes it the ultimate killiing machine.

 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 2:14 pm

Dude, you are full of **** on the issue and have no clue what those citations are telling you.  It is highly entertaining watching you. 

You ready to talk about lowers yet?  

There is nothing special about an AR 15 style weapon that makes it the ultimate killiing machine.

Find citations to back your version. 

You were a REMF, your reminiscences are irrelevant. 

Huey » 01 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 1:59 pm

No, all those citations do not confirm your argument or support you reasons for banning it.  All it does is support your whine about variant.  You do not understand what you are reading.

No, Verbal.

I understand fine....that's why so many sources confirm my statements.

You are making **** up, which is why your posts are evidence deficient.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2022, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 2:36 pm

No, Verbal.

I understand fine....that's why so many sources confirm my statements.

You are making **** up, which is why your posts are evidence deficient.

No son, you don't understand fine.

When you can articulate in your own words what makes the AR 15 STYLE weapon any different than any other other SEMI AUTOMATIC then you will prove you understand.  

I use weed control on my lawn, but like gun control, it doesn't work for ****.   

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 10:56 am

No..that's ****...."Assault-style" sporting goods rifles are the most glaring symptom of our irrational approach to ALL private forearms ownership...

One of the issues with these "sporting goods" is the leverage it affords the former sportsman and law abiding gun owner when he gets a hair across his ***.

That is one of your dumber comments.

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm

The most noticeable difference is that the civilian AR15 lower receiver does not have the third trigger pin hole for the auto sear above the safety selector. The trigger pocket is also typically milled to different dimensions to prevent the acceptance of an auto-sear as well. However, this is not a rule. Many companies still sell their lowers with M16 trigger pocket dimensions, they are just missing the proverbial "third-hole".Drilling that third hole is what legally changes your AR-15 from a semi-automatic rifle, into an illegal machine gun.

ibid.

I decline to discuss reframe...

Stop "telling" me things, coward...

If the AR 15 style weapon was designed for combat it would have been designed with that hole.

Game.  Set.  Match

*Huey » 31 May 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 1:53 pm

If the AR 15 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design



Tiny,

You just demonstrated that you can't read.

Blackvegetable » 31 May 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 1:56 pm

*Huey » 31 May 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 1:53 pm

If the AR 15 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design



Tiny,

You just demonstrated that you can't read.

 

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

Game over.  

*Huey » 31 May 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 1:57 pm

BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828

Game over.

Citations matter...
Tiny the Illiterate doesn't. 
 

Blackvegetable » 31 May 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

31 May 2025, 1:59 pm

Citations matter...
Tiny the Illiterate doesn't.

Keep running ******.  You lost.  You will not address what is discussed in that link.  For the same reason you won't answer this:

Do you believe the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians during the 2016 campaign?

Blackvegetable » 14 Oct 2020, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020, 8:17 am

I don't see that anywhere in the OP....

Maybe you should have made clear that you are yappping about something you heard....

Go **** yourself you lying traitor *** bastard.