Liberal Forum

The Narrative which explains why this thread must be done "Old School" will have to await my access to a larger keyboard..

But while we wait, let this part of the Hunt begin...

Here is CP calling The Dwarf's bluff

I will offer to referee your dispute - in good faith. I will provide you with a locked thread that no one else can access except you two - or you two and myself, to ask clarifying questions and critique arguments. Your choice. I will not become a participant.

You are free to accept, decline or counter offer. I will begin by saying this: The question he continues to ask, regarding the sequentialism of two dates - is rhetorical, and therefore undeserving of response. He seems to think it is kryptonite and you seem to think it is irrelevant to the issue. I highly doubt anyone else is following y'all's argument. It's most likely that no one knows who is right. It's likely that the righties assume it is him and the lefties assume it is you.

Whether you accept, decline or counter offer, I would appreciate a brief statement of the issue between yous, as you see it.
 PG is enabled as this is read only for non-invitees...

Pengwin » 13 Jan 2021, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2021, 7:56 pm

I was responding to CP’s fear of ***, guilt over sex, and need to **** in the *** before he explodes.

well, you better wrap up @Blackvegetable  invokes PG privileges.  He is kind of a ****** in these matters.

Pengwin » 13 Jan 2021, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2021, 7:56 pm

I was responding to CP’s fear of ***, guilt over sex, and need to **** in the *** before he explodes.

Democratic party 2024: gay sex is mandatory

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2021, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2021, 12:28 pm

The Narrative which explains why this thread must be done "Old School" will have to await my access to a larger keyboard..

But while we wait, let this part of the Hunt begin...

Here is CP calling The Dwarf's bluff

I will offer to referee your dispute - in good faith. I will provide you with a locked thread that no one else can access except you two - or you two and myself, to ask clarifying questions and critique arguments. Your choice. I will not become a participant.

You are free to accept, decline or counter offer. I will begin by saying this: The question he continues to ask, regarding the sequentialism of two dates - is rhetorical, and therefore undeserving of response. He seems to think it is kryptonite and you seem to think it is irrelevant to the issue. I highly doubt anyone else is following y'all's argument. It's most likely that no one knows who is right. It's likely that the righties assume it is him and the lefties assume it is you.

Whether you accept, decline or counter offer, I would appreciate a brief statement of the issue between yous, as you see it.
 PG is enabled as this is read only for non-invitees...  

Aw, BV must be a ******.  He just called me a ****** for starting a PG thread.  LMAO!  ******!

Huey » 28 Oct 2021, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 2:53 pm

Aw, BV must be a ******.  He just called me a ****** for starting a PG thread.  LMAO!  ******!

PG is enabled as this is read only for non-invitees...

Damn, are you **** stupid....

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2021, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 3:27 pm

Huey » 28 Oct 2021, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 2:53 pm

Aw, BV must be a ******.  He just called me a ****** for starting a PG thread.  LMAO!  ******!

PG is enabled as this is read only for non-invitees...

Damn, are you **** stupid....

 

That is not your only one you have ever used.  ******!  Now go ahead and lie about it, ******.

Hell, ******, you once made the ultimate ****** move.  You started a tribute thread and used the PG mode.  It don't get any more ****** than that.

Now go perv on some young girls at the gym, old man. 

Huey » 28 Oct 2021, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 3:30 pm

That is not your only one you have ever used.  ******!  Now go ahead and lie about it, ******.

Hell, ******, you once made the ultimate ****** move.  You started a tribute thread and used the PG mode.  It don't get any more ****** than that.

Now go perv on some young girls at the gym, old man.
 

Why was that thread read only for non-invitees, Sheliagh?

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2021, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 3:32 pm

Huey » 28 Oct 2021, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 3:30 pm

That is not your only one you have ever used.  ******!  Now go ahead and lie about it, ******.

Hell, ******, you once made the ultimate ****** move.  You started a tribute thread and used the PG mode.  It don't get any more ****** than that.

Now go perv on some young girls at the gym, old man.

 

Why was that thread read only for non-invitees, Sheliagh?

 

 

Not relevant.  It was not the first time you used it and it won't be the last!  I wished I had bumped that tribute thread where you used it. 

Huey » 28 Oct 2021, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 3:38 pm

Not relevant.  It was not the first time you used it and it won't be the last!  I wished I had bumped that tribute thread where you used it.

Not ONE answer, Dwarf...

Not relevant. 

You're lying.


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2021, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2021, 12:28 pm

The Narrative which explains why this thread must be done "Old School" will have to await my access to a larger keyboard..

But while we wait, let this part of the Hunt begin...

Here is CP calling The Dwarf's bluff

I will offer to referee your dispute - in good faith. I will provide you with a locked thread that no one else can access except you two - or you two and myself, to ask clarifying questions and critique arguments. Your choice. I will not become a participant.

You are free to accept, decline or counter offer. I will begin by saying this: The question he continues to ask, regarding the sequentialism of two dates - is rhetorical, and therefore undeserving of response. He seems to think it is kryptonite and you seem to think it is irrelevant to the issue. I highly doubt anyone else is following y'all's argument. It's most likely that no one knows who is right. It's likely that the righties assume it is him and the lefties assume it is you.

Whether you accept, decline or counter offer, I would appreciate a brief statement of the issue between yous, as you see it.
 PG is enabled as this is read only for non-invitees...

Three possible cases: 

 1.       You are so **** stupid and dense that you genuinely think that there is a connection between knowing that Ovomit was Potus in 2009 implies  not knowing who was Potus in 2008. 

2.       You are a lying sack of ****.

 3.       All of the above.

 Which is it, coward?

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2021, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2021, 3:48 pm

 

Three possible cases: 

 1.       You are so **** stupid and dense that you genuinely think that there is a connection between knowing that Ovomit was Potus in 2009 implies  not knowing who was Potus in 2008. 

2.       You are a lying sack of ****.

 3.       All of the above.

 Which is it, coward?
 
 

I just wonder what's wrong with you people?

Delete