Liberal Forum

Obama is a perfect example of how what a president says, what legislation he proposes, and regulation he pushes effects the stock market. Hell, their was a time period when almost every time he gave a speech on the ACA or on his economic and tax policy plans the market nose dived.

viewtopic.php?p=229895#p229895


 

 

:die:  

Oh...wait....did I fully credit the source?

@Huey  

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:31 am

Obama is a perfect example of how what a president says, what legislation he proposes, and regulation he pushes effects the stock market. Hell, their was a time period when almost every time he gave a speech on the ACA or on his economic and tax policy plans the market nose dived.

viewtopic.php?p=229895#p229895

Oh, lord.  Another BV meltdown where he bumps old threads.  BV is preparing for the deletion of old threads.

BV, Since you are in 2014, more than three years prior to arrival with your gang of losers, I am guessing you still have not found that photo yet.  Lmao!

The horror, I used the wrong “there” in that post.

This is **** hilarious.

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:31 am

Obama is a perfect example of how what a president says, what legislation he proposes, and regulation he pushes effects the stock market. Hell, their was a time period when almost every time he gave a speech on the ACA or on his economic and tax policy plans the market nose dived.

viewtopic.php?p=229895#p229895

He's wrong but not for the reason you implied.

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:48 am

Oh, lord.  Another BV meltdown where he bumps old threads.  BV is preparing for the deletion of old threads.

BV, Since you are in 2014, more than three years prior to arrival with your gang of losers, I am guessing you still have not found that photo yet.  Lmao!

The horror, I used the wrong “there” in that post.

This is **** hilarious.

Yeah...very observant, Sheilagh..


 
 

Polar1ty » 15 Oct 2021, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:50 am

He's wrong but not for the reason you implied.

Now we are wading into murky territory..


His "point"

My "implication"



Could you light a match?

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:50 am

Yeah...very observant, Sheilagh..

And yet on this particular spamming repost of yours you refuse to post the link to the original thread which means you have no context.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:52 am

Now we are wading into murky territory..

His "point"

My "implication"

Could you light a match?

Stock market / presidency : independent variables.

Same reason I castigated conservatives for suggesting the orange conman was responsible for a "roaring stock market." Nonsense. Had Hillary been president the outcomes would be similar.

Polar1ty » 15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am

Stock market / presidency : independent variables.

Same reason I castigated conservatives for suggesting the orange conman was responsible for a "roaring stock market." Nonsense. Had Hillary been president the outcomes would be similar.

That's kinda Level 1.

The markets are certainly driven by a combination of mania and economic fundamentals, but the noise is less significant over an 8 year stretch.

I should have linked to the Investopedia article, because it pointed out how poorly Wall Street anticipates the effects of changes in Administrations.

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am

And yet on this particular spamming repost of yours you refuse to post the link to the original thread which means you have no context.

I've linked to your comment, you **** idiot.


It takes you directly to the thread.



 

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:50 am

Yeah...very observant, Sheilagh..

And yet on this particular spamming repost of yours you refuse to post the link to the original thread which means you have no context.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:17 am

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am

And yet on this particular spamming repost of yours you refuse to post the link to the original thread which means you have no context.

I've linked to your comment, you **** idiot.


It takes you directly to the thread.



 

 

Note the following words:

yet on this particular spamming repost of yours

There is no link to the discussion involving the picture you keep spamming the forum with.  

Nod and rethink who the **** idiot is in the conversation.  
 

Polar1ty » 15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:54 am

Stock market / presidency : independent variables.

Same reason I castigated conservatives for suggesting the orange conman was responsible for a "roaring stock market." Nonsense. Had Hillary been president the outcomes would be similar.

When former President Barack Obama took office on Jan. 20, 2009, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) continued its credit crisis slump and fell to 7,949.09, the lowest inaugural performance (as measured by percentage drop) for the Dow since its creation in 1896.1 The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq took similar hits on inauguration day, dropping 5.3% and 5.8%, respectively.2 3 

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answer ... office.asp


 

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:31 am

Note the following words:

There is no link to the discussion involving the picture you keep spamming the forum with.  

Nod and rethink who the **** idiot is in the conversation.

Nod and rethink who the **** idiot is in the conversation.

Let's see.
​​


Acknowledge that you've been told what the photo illustrates.


Explain why the photo needs a link to anything?


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:41 am

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:31 am

Note the following words:

There is no link to the discussion involving the picture you keep spamming the forum with.  

Nod and rethink who the **** idiot is in the conversation.

Nod and rethink who the **** idiot is in the conversation.

Let's see.
​​


Acknowledge that you've been told what the photo illustrates.


Explain why the photo needs a link to anything?


 

 

First, acknowledge you were not paying attention to what I posted and we wrong.  THEN we I will answer those questions, diverto boy. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 10:31 am

Obama is a perfect example of how what a president says, what legislation he proposes, and regulation he pushes effects the stock market. Hell, their was a time period when almost every time he gave a speech on the ACA or on his economic and tax policy plans the market nose dived.

viewtopic.php?p=229895#p229895

Dude, what is with you and snooping through member's posts? You have done this three times to me already. Do something productive with your life. 

Vegas » 15 Oct 2021, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:43 am

Dude, what is with you and snooping through member's posts? You have done this three times to me already. Do something productive with your life.

Define "snooping".


Shut the **** up until you do.
 

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:43 am

First, acknowledge you were not paying attention to what I posted and we wrong.  THEN we I will answer those questions, diverto boy.

No, projectolad....there'll be no diversions.


Answer the question.

Blackvegetable » 15 Oct 2021, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:47 am

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:43 am

First, acknowledge you were not paying attention to what I posted and we wrong.  THEN we I will answer those questions, diverto boy.

No, projectolad....there'll be no diversions.


Answer the question.

 

Admit you were wrong and I will answer your diversionary questions.  That came first.  DO IT!  LMAO!

Huey » 15 Oct 2021, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2021, 11:50 am

Admit you were wrong and I will answer your diversionary questions.  That came first.  DO IT!  LMAO!

I wasn't...

Your complaint didn't specify..

The link to the thread with the photo was entirely irrelevant, and knowing how you feel about diversions and ambiguity.....and integrity, I dismissed it as a possibility.