Liberal Forum

maineman » 11 Nov 2023, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 8:53 pm

tap dancing doesn't become you.

The disability had HERETOFORE been incurred.  THAT is what was repealed.  NOT any future office holder who supported some future insurrection in distant future centuries 

prove me wrong.

The law proves you wrong. 
Your room temp IQ simply can't comprehend why.
 

golfboy » 11 Nov 2023, 9:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 9:17 pm

The law proves you wrong. 
Your room temp IQ simply can't comprehend why.

nice dodge.  The law specifically uses the word HERETOFORE.  It does NOT apply to future insurrectionists in future centuries.

prove me wrong.

I dare you, you dyslexic, moronic buffoon.

maineman » 11 Nov 2023, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 9:40 pm

nice dodge.  The law specifically uses the word HERETOFORE.  It does NOT apply to future insurrectionists in future centuries.

prove me wrong.

I dare you, you dyslexic, moronic buffoon.

again, I don't need to prove you wrong.  The law does that. 
 

golfboy » 11 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm

again, I don't need to prove you wrong.  The law does that.

the law specifically deals with people who, PRIOR to the passage of the law (HERETOFORE), had been involved in an insurrection.  By using that word, it clearly and unambiguously does NOT apply to those folks who may participate in an insurrection at some point in the future.
 

...but you wouldn't be able to process that in your sad little damaged brain. But your stubbornness will drive you on nonetheless. Stubborn AND terminally stupid. That combination has always made you UNIQUE in your group of MAGA morons.

Hey @golfboy  ....  Don't you just **** HATE It when I kick your *** like this?

Heretofore, it has always been like slow-pitch fungo balls.... hereafter, it will be the same.  

Come on back whenever you feel compelled to get the **** kicked out of you... I will gladly oblige!    
 

maineman » 11 Nov 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 9:55 pm

Hey @golfboy  ....  Don't you just **** HATE It when I kick your *** like this?

Heretofore, it has always been like slow-pitch fungo balls.... hereafter, it will be the same.  

Come on back whenever you feel compelled to get the **** kicked out of you... I will gladly oblige!  

lol.   Leave it to mainbitch to declare himself "winner" because he knows he got his ****** grabbed in public again. 
*******. bitch. 

The amusing part is that he still thinks the President is an "officer" of the United States. 
And he didn't even know that last sentence of the Amendment existed, claiming Congress couldn't change an amendment.     
 
 

golfboy » 11 Nov 2023, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 9:59 pm

lol.   Leave it to mainbitch to declare himself "winner" because he knows he got his ****** grabbed in public again. 
*******. bitch. 

The amusing part is that he still thinks the President is an "officer" of the United States. 
And he didn't even know that last sentence of the Amendment existed, claiming Congress couldn't change an amendment.   

"Heretofore".  One wonders why Congress used THAT particular word??

The real amusing part is that you can't admit that the word was chosen for the precise reason I laid out - to absolve past insurrectionists of their crimes and to allow them to reenter the process of governance.  If Congress had wanted to say that any future insurrectionists would have their preemptive approval and encouragement,  they could have simply started the process to repeal the entire amendment or, at least, section 3, which they did not.  In fact, they were quite able to absolve crimes of the past while retaining the admonitions against insurrections going forward simply by inserting that one word.  "Heretofore" is a very cool word, imho.  It says so much with just ten little letters!  
 

maineman » 11 Nov 2023, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 7:03 pm

isn't that a really long way of saying you don't have the roll calls? :rofl:  

Social consensus doesn't change the evolving process that keeps the population never same ancestors born a second time since conceived one at a time combined to total sum occupying space now.

maineman » 12 Nov 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 8:33 am

"Heretofore".  One wonders why Congress used THAT particular word??

The real amusing part is that you can't admit that the word was chosen for the precise reason I laid out - to absolve past insurrectionists of their crimes and to allow them to reenter the process of governance.  If Congress had wanted to say that any future insurrectionists would have their preemptive approval and encouragement,  they could have simply started the process to repeal the entire amendment or, at least, section 3, which they did not.  In fact, they were quite able to absolve crimes of the past while retaining the admonitions against insurrections going forward simply by inserting that one word.  "Heretofore" is a very cool word, imho.  It says so much with just ten little letters!

Weird you can't find anything to back up your ignorant position.

 

golfboy » 12 Nov 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 6:45 pm

Weird you can't find anything to back up your ignorant position.

 

Be careful you don't say something stupid calling others ignorant when you won't accept how evolving happens in plain sight. Hypocrisy comes from saying something different from everyone else evolving forward same way all life has evolved since inception to each ancestral lineage of each species in this atmosphere.

golfboy » 12 Nov 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 6:45 pm

Weird you can't find anything to back up your ignorant position.

Why would I need to?  The language is undeniable.  "HERETOFORE" has an obvious unambiguous definition.  It says what it says.  It means what it means.  Including that word clearly shows that the relief provided is only for prior behavior.  

maineman » 13 Nov 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2023, 7:50 am

Why would I need to?  The language is undeniable.  "HERETOFORE" has an obvious unambiguous definition.  It says what it says.  It means what it means.  Including that word clearly shows that the relief provided is only for prior behavior.  

When intellectual relative time logistics isn't the same thing as biological relative time adapting as displaced "heretofore" is hyperbole.

maineman » 12 Nov 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 8:33 am

"Heretofore".  One wonders why Congress used THAT particular word??

The real amusing part is that you can't admit that the word was chosen for the precise reason I laid out - to absolve past insurrectionists of their crimes and to allow them to reenter the process of governance.  If Congress had wanted to say that any future insurrectionists would have their preemptive approval and encouragement,  they could have simply started the process to repeal the entire amendment or, at least, section 3, which they did not.  In fact, they were quite able to absolve crimes of the past while retaining the admonitions against insurrections going forward simply by inserting that one word.  "Heretofore" is a very cool word, imho.  It says so much with just ten little letters!  
 

Because everyone governed in good faith is misled cradle to grave every generation gap serving humanity's ideas of better tomorrows when evolving doesn't physically exceed being alive now.
the missing link of "ity" is always in plain sight between people debating reality and humanity. Real Human beings debating what if possibilities and what about anyone not complying with established reasonable doubts life is self evident.

maineman » 13 Nov 2023, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2023, 7:50 am

Why would I need to?  The language is undeniable.  "HERETOFORE" has an obvious unambiguous definition.  It says what it says.  It means what it means.  Including that word clearly shows that the relief provided is only for prior behavior.

Poor mainbitch.
3 Court cases against Article 14.

And today, the Colorado judge:
Section 3 does not specifically refer to the presidency, as it does members of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives. Instead, the clause refers to “elector of President and Vice President,” along with civil and military offices.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
Exactly what I've been telling mainbitch for months. 
 

golfboy » 17 Nov 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2023, 7:57 pm

Poor mainbitch.
3 Court cases against Article 14.

And today, the Colorado judge:
Section 3 does not specifically refer to the presidency, as it does members of the U.S. Senate or House of Representatives. Instead, the clause refers to “elector of President and Vice President,” along with civil and military offices.

BWAHAHHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
Exactly what I've been telling mainbitch for months.

Different legal scholars have different opinions.

I would hope that didn’t come as a surprise to you.
 

maineman » 17 Nov 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2023, 8:11 pm

Different legal scholars have different opinions.

I would hope that didn’t come as a surprise to you.

This liberal judge just kicked your *** with exactly what I've been telling you for months. 
Article 14 Section 3 doesn't apply to the President.     
 
 

golfboy » 17 Nov 2023, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2023, 8:19 pm

This liberal judge just kicked your *** with exactly what I've been telling you for months. 
Article 14 Section 3 doesn't apply to the President.   

And, somehow, you think that his is the only legal opinion held by jurists and scholars on this issue?

wow.

Heretofore, I would not have thought such unimaginative, narrow-minded thinking was possible in even marginally educated adults.
 
 

maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2023, 7:14 am

And, somehow, you think that his is the only legal opinion held by jurists and scholars on this issue?

wow.

Heretofore, I would not have thought such unimaginative, narrow-minded thinking was possible in adults.

Early,  you **** the bed or something?

maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2023, 7:14 am

And, somehow, you think that his is the only legal opinion held by jurists and scholars on this issue?

wow.

Heretofore, I would not have thought such unimaginative, narrow-minded thinking was possible in adults.
 

Heretofore is a tyrant's/tyranny favorite word. Its parallel phase is "Because we said so.". Anyone disagreeing or disobeying will be charged with insubordination, treason, blasphemy of that social consensus used ancestrally to this date.

Please try and worm out off it. Bet this gets ignored, I cheated and added these edits after the post arrived below..