Liberal Forum

neueregel » 05 Jan 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:24 am

MSNBC, like clockwork....first story, rising cases of OMNICRON and reminders to hide under your bed. Second story, the anniversary of Jan 6... bigger than Juneteenth and Kwanza combined! They've got five guests lined up to clutch their pearls.

What did it say about omnicron?

neueregel » 05 Jan 2022, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:25 am

I don't feel entitled like that. Either way, I've made my point.

Is that a "yes" or "no"?


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:25 am

What did it say about omnicron?

It said Chicago teachers don't want to go back to work. To MSNBC's credit, they had an ex-CDC director on saying the teacher's union wasn't following the science. He'll likely be de-platformed by end of day.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:26 am

Is that a "yes" or "no"?

Was I not clear?

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:24 am

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:22 am

Damn Askholio, you are working the questions today.

yea, runny..

You're under an assault.

 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2021, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2021, 2:44 pm

Huey » 06 Oct 2021, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2021, 2:21 pm

Hmm, I thought she participated in an insurrection.  I see no charges under this US Code:

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383

As far as her fear she made the choice.  Now she has to live with the consequences.

If I find any such charges, will you acknowledge that you're an imbecile?

 

Speaking of runny.  You found that "one" person charged with insurrection prior to the date in question on that thread?  Keep Running, Sirsprintsalot. 

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:35 am

Speaking of runny.  You found that "one" person charged with insurrection prior to the date in question on that thread?  Keep Running, Sirsprintsalot.

Another selective retelling, as you run, Coward?

neueregel » 05 Jan 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:33 am

Was I not clear?

No....you weren't. 


 

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:35 am

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:24 am

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:22 am

Damn Askholio, you are working the questions today.

yea, runny..

You're under an assault.

 


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2021, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2021, 2:44 pm

Huey » 06 Oct 2021, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2021, 2:21 pm

Hmm, I thought she participated in an insurrection.  I see no charges under this US Code:

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383

As far as her fear she made the choice.  Now she has to live with the consequences.

If I find any such charges, will you acknowledge that you're an imbecile?


 

Speaking of runny.  You found that "one" person charged with insurrection prior to the date in question on that thread?  Keep Running, Sirsprintsalot. 

 

If I was selectively retelling I would not have posted your words and a link back to the thread in question, Sir *******.  Keep running.

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:40 am

If I was selectively retelling I would not have posted your words and a link back to the thread in question, Sir *******.  Keep running.

If you weren't,  you would have posted my offer, and your attendant cowardice.


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:39 am

No....you weren't.

I said I don’t feel entitled to an answer. Sometime, no answer is answer enough. I’ve been around long enough to know what a non-answer means. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:44 am

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:40 am

If I was selectively retelling I would not have posted your words and a link back to the thread in question, Sir *******.  Keep running.

If you weren't,  you would have posted my offer, and your attendant cowardice.


 

 

You are free to post it.  This should be good.  

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:47 am

You are free to post it.  This should be good.

Why participate in your diversion?

neueregel » 05 Jan 2022, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 9:46 am

I said I don’t feel entitled to an answer. Sometime, no answer is answer enough. I’ve been around long enough to know what a non-answer means.

There's another.

I’ve been around long enough to know what a non-answer means.

Funny.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 10:12 am

There's another.

Funny.

Yep...and you'll notice, still no answer from our friend.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 10:11 am

Why participate in your diversion?

Title of the thread:

The Capitol Insurrectionists

That is how a man does it.  Discussing the insurrection that had no insurrectionist is not a diversion.

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 10:32 am

Title of the thread:

The Capitol Insurrectionists

That is how a man does it.  Discussing the insurrection that had no insurrectionist is not a diversion.

But this isn't about the thread...it's about an old sock, selectively recalled.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 10:55 am

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 10:32 am

Title of the thread:

The Capitol Insurrectionists

That is how a man does it.  Discussing the insurrection that had no insurrectionist is not a diversion.

But this isn't about the thread...it's about an old sock, selectively recalled.

 

Until you show otherwise your words stand.  

Huey » 05 Jan 2022, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 11:02 am

Until you show otherwise your words stand.

And I'll stand right here with them.

you've been getting killed on the topic of the law...

I'll elaborate.....the minute you concede that you have NO idea how POTUS should address inflation.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2022, 11:30 am

And I'll stand right here with them.

you've been getting killed on the topic of the law...

I'll elaborate.....the minute you concede that you have NO idea how POTUS should address inflation.

You know what thread you need to go to for that.  

FBI To Host First Annual Jan 6 Reunion

U.S.

January 4th, 2022 -

BabylonBee.com




WASHINGTON, D.C.—Special agents involved in last year’s ‘January 6th Insurrection Against Democracy™’ are set to reunite as guests of honor at an extravagant gala hosted by the FBI. The event will reportedly feature live music and entertainment, with comedian James Corden acting as master of ceremonies.

Numerous celebrities and public figures are expected to be in attendance, including former FBI Director James Comey. “I’m really excited to be relevant again,” he said, excitedly rubbing his hands together.

According to sources, several private citizens have questioned why taxpayer money is being used to throw a lavish party for government officials. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki addressed these concerns during her daily press briefing.

“Well, first I would say, that President Biden is committed to the Build Back Better™ bill,” Psaki reasoned. “Therefore, he cares for the American people and, as such, cares deeply about how their money is utilized. So, obviously, it’s fine.”

Psaki went on to applaud the FBI for all their hard work that cannot be disclosed.

The event will not be open to the public.