what was the purpose then??Buffalo » 12 Apr 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Tell that to the blm *** and antifa *** that looted businesses and burned them, police staTions and FEDERAL COURTHOUSES, ASSHOLE!!!
There is a critical difference between this summer’s riots and the incursion into the capitol building. The intent of this summer’s riots (according to their organizers) was to disrupt law and order in this country, and to destroy its institutions. The purpose of the D.C. protest was to intimidate politicians into adhering to the law, abiding by their oaths of office, and to force them to expose criminal activity that they (the protesters), honestly and in good faith, believe took place. They were protesting in defense of the law. Morally, there’s a world of difference between the two. They have complaints that are directly analogous to those that fueled the summer riots – they’ve been ignored, abused, lied to, insulted, and physically set upon – but they were demanding the enforcement of the law and the restoration of our institutions, not their destruction.
Free speech against the current regime and its marxist agenda of the destruction of America is no longer allowed. It will get one put in the gulag!!!
he wanted them to have protection from the capitol police who would protect the capitol.GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 9:30 am
Only a SHRIEKING DRAMA QUEEN IDIOT like you would believe that Trump wanted the National Guard to assist the violence and vandalism.....![]()
The purpose of the D.C. protest was to intimidate politicians into adhering to the law, abiding by their oaths of office, and to force them to expose criminal activity that they (the protesters), honestly and in good faith, believe took place. They were protesting in defense of the law.
Buffalo » 12 Apr 2022, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The purpose of the D.C. protest was to intimidate politicians into adhering to the law, abiding by their oaths of office, and to force them to expose criminal activity that they (the protesters), honestly and in good faith, believe took place. They were protesting in defense of the law.
Agreed.jerrab » 12 Apr 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ he wanted them to have protection from the capitol police who would shoot and beat to death unarmed women.
And exactly how did they expect to accomplish that without bringing in A SINGLE WEAPON?jerrab » 12 Apr 2022, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ a protest is done with signs and chants, not bear spray and flagpoles.
this was not a protest, it was an attempt to overtake the government.
Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ And exactly how did they expect to accomplish that without bringing in A SINGLE WEAPON?
Real deep-thinker there, aren't you?
Really? Show me evidence that anyone inside the Capitol on Jan. 6th was carrying a weapon.
Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Really? Show me evidence that anyone inside the Capitol on Jan. 6th was carrying a weapon.
And when you're unable to, admit that you don't know ****!
RANT ON ....YOU TOTALLY RIDICULOUS DRAMA QUEEN...!!!jerrab » 12 Apr 2022, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ a protest is done with signs and chants, not bear spray and flagpoles.
this was not a protest, it was an attempt to overtake the government.

“attempt to overtake the government”…..do you think that the protesters could have tried harder?….maybe with automatic firearms, perhaps?……your claim is comical at best….jerrab » 12 Apr 2022, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ a protest is done with signs and chants, not bear spray and flagpoles.
this was not a protest, it was an attempt to overtake the government.
GHETTOBLASTER » 19 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ RANT ON ....YOU TOTALLY RIDICULOUS DRAMA QUEEN...!!!![]()
Only a mentally Ill POS like you would think that a FLAG POLE and BEAR SPRAY are weapons that could "overthrow our government"....jerrab » 19 Apr 2022, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ your boys are going down and claiming that flagpoles are not weapons is going to make the judge crack up laughing,

no one said they were smart.Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ And exactly how did they expect to accomplish that without bringing in A SINGLE WEAPON?
Real deep-thinker there, aren't you?
thelion » 19 Apr 2022, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ no one said they were smart.
look who they chose to believe.
So where is the evidence that any of the rioters had weapons inside the Capitol?jerrab » 19 Apr 2022, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I suppose you think wars in the middle ages were not fought with weapons.
Guy Reffit said in court he had a pistol on him.Zeets2 » 19 Apr 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Really? Show me evidence that anyone inside the Capitol on Jan. 6th was carrying a weapon.
And when you're unable to, admit that you don't know ****!
PROVIDE US WITH THE ENTIRE INVENTORY OF WEAPONS THAT MAGA WERE GOING TO USE TO "OVERTHROW THE US GOVERNMENT" WITH.Squatchman » 19 Apr 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Guy Reffit said in court he had a pistol on him.
He also said the 3 percenters were armed. He is one.