B.See » 24 Jun 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes Isn’t Sorry for January 6. A Judge Gave Him 18 Years. – Mother Jones “You are not a political prisoner, Mr. Rhodes.”
Stewart Rhodes' sentence is surprisingly low: former prosecutor - Raw Story
what does that tshirt say?golfboy » 24 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Meanwhile, Joe Biden's corruption is ignored by the FBI and DoJ.
Weird double standard you've got going on there, *******.
No, actually the problem is that these DA's (liberal or otherwise) are trying to put said murderers and criminals behind bars but the courts and prison system are sending them back out into society because they don't value the victims (unless of course the victim happens to be some person of privilege).golfboy » 24 Jun 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ If he committed violence, he should be jailed.
Problem is, the DoJ is violating a lot of people's human rights, and the left doesn't give a rat's ***.
Meanwhile, murderers and violent criminals are being set free by liberal DAs all over this country, where they go out on the street and commit the same crimes again. Why not, when they know no one cares?
The District Attorney's office decides what charges to press against the perpetrators... if any at all.B.See » 26 Jun 2023, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ No, actually the problem is that these DA's (liberal or otherwise) are trying to put said murderers and criminals behind bars but the courts and prison system are sending them back out into society because they don't value the victims (unless of course the victim happens to be some person of privilege).
These perps prey on the community and I happen to be all FOR locking these fkrs (those who commit crimes of violence and murder) up after due process and conviction.
Talk to your dog, he'll understand the concepts to a greater degree.RedheadedStranger » 26 Jun 2023, 4:46 am » wrote: ↑ The District Attorney's office decides what charges to press against the perpetrators... if any at all.
Alvin Bragg in Manhattan is a fine example. He lets the hard criminals back onto the streets in the name of "social justice", and spends most of his offices resources going after political opponents.
I'm convinced he is clueless on most topics... which is why he relies on copy and pasting articles and using peanut gallery on most of his threads so he can ban people that make him look stupid.RebelGator » 26 Jun 2023, 4:59 am » wrote: ↑ Talk to your dog, he'll understand the concepts to a greater degree.
No, the COPS are trying to put the murderers and criminals in prison.B.See » 26 Jun 2023, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ No, actually the problem is that these DA's (liberal or otherwise) are trying to put said murderers and criminals behind bars but the courts and prison system are sending them back out into society because they don't value the victims (unless of course the victim happens to be some person of privilege).
These perps prey on the community and I happen to be all FOR locking these fkrs (those who commit crimes of violence and murder) up after due process and conviction.
Or maybe I have REASON to know about **** that the average person (esp those who can only spew unproven MAGAT propaganda, such as yourself) DON'T know about, CLUELESS. Case in point:RedheadedStranger » 26 Jun 2023, 5:07 am » wrote: ↑ I'm convinced he is clueless on most topics... which is why he relies on copy and pasting articles and using peanut gallery on most of his threads so he can ban people that make him look stupid.
Yes the da's decide what charges they want to bring, but it's the JUDGE who (where they aren't bound by mandatory sentencing laws) decides on the SENTENCE, clueless.
seeing as how liberals on this forum have been BANNED from posting new links, images, new threads, and have had threads either moved to other forums or just ERASED, you can stop you little BITCH-*** whining about how I don't let vermin like YOU **** in only EIGHT threads.RedheadedStranger » 26 Jun 2023, 5:07 am » wrote: ↑ I'm convinced he is clueless on most topics... which is why he relies on copy and pasting articles and using peanut gallery on most of his threads so he can ban people that make him look stupid.
What you present here fails to disprove my point.Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 24 Feb 2023, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Sure there is - sixty-some lawsuits made claims that there was a fraudulent election, and all lost in court, primarily from a lack of evidence of fraud.
What you are wanting is to legalize illegal paths to challenging elections.
There wasn't even 1 firearm found that day among tens of thousands of protesters. No evidence that MAGA killed 5 and seriously injured 140 capitol cops. When the government has to repeatedly lie to make a case..then that shows exactly how weak their case is.Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 24 Feb 2023, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Sure there is - sixty-some lawsuits made claims that there was a fraudulent election, and all lost in court, primarily from a lack of evidence of fraud.
What you are wanting is to legalize illegal paths to challenging elections.
The Capitol riot is not the basis of Trump’s new charges.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Aug 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ There wasn't even 1 firearm found that day among tens of thousands of protesters. No evidence that MAGA killed 5 and seriously injured 140 capitol cops. When the government has to repeatedly lie to make a case..then that shows exactly how weak their case is.
you're too much.....!!Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑
The underlying reason the mob stormed the Capitol was to hang Mike Pence, or otherwise stop the count.
It's too bad too.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Aug 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑ There wasn't even 1 firearm found that day among tens of thousands of protesters. No evidence that MAGA killed 5 and seriously injured 140 capitol cops. When the government has to repeatedly lie to make a case..then that shows exactly how weak their case is.
which one was carrying the rope? No rope there? ****.Bruce » 03 Aug 2023, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑ The Capitol riot is not the basis of Trump’s new charges.
The underlying reason the mob stormed the Capitol was to hang Mike Pence, or otherwise stop the count.
Trump is charged with conspiring with six others to try and get Mike Pence to replace the legal votes from seven states with bogus Trump votes.
It’s a hard curve ball.
They already identified who dropped the toots.Buffalo » 04 Aug 2023, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ The FBI can track down the thousands of individuals who were in or near the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, arrest them and throw away the key but the US Secret Service can't identify out of a few hundred visitors (who probably have to sign in) the person who brought in the bag of cocaine to a limited entrance way into the White House.
What was Trump doing in Biden's WH a couple of weeks ago?Squatchman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ They already identified who dropped the toots.
But they figure with all the other sentences coming down a simple possession charge on trump would be silly at this point.
THERE WAS NO INSURRECTION, FRUITCAKE.B.See » 25 Oct 2021, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑ I've long opined that there was much more to the seditious Capitol Insurrection of January 6th, that others, within and without our government were involved. NOT that it'd matter worth a flying to Trump's MAGAs ANYWAY. Considering 66 percent of them (yes, that's two out of every three) don't consider the riot an insurrection at all, and 77 percent of them don't think Trump had anything to DO with it... as per the right wing Bizarro world alternate reality.
66% of Republicans don't consider the January 6 Capitol riot to be an attack on the government, according to a new poll
"A full two thirds of Republican don't consider the January 6 assault on the US Capitol - which resulted in several deaths and disrupted the counting of electoral votes for several hours - to have been an attack on the US government. That same poll also found that 77% of Republicans don't hold Trump responsible for it anyway."
Trump had a "Command Center" to plot his Coup and Insurrection
Rolling Stone: Members of Congress Helped Plan Jan. 6 Attack
Cheney: Trump Appears 'Personally Involved' in January 6 Insurrection
Trumpist Senators ‘Hid From Colleagues in Closet’ as Capitol Riot Raged Around Them
Blah,blah,blah.righteous » 04 Aug 2023, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ THERE WAS NO INSURRECTION, FRUITCAKE.
NO EVIDENCE OF AND NO PROOF OF AN INSURRECTION