do you know what the words "seditious conspiracy" actually mean?righteous » 04 Aug 2023, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ THERE WAS NO INSURRECTION, FRUITCAKE.
NO EVIDENCE OF AND NO PROOF OF AN INSURRECTION
Squatchman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ MY PENECTOMY WENT WELL. MY HONEY BOYFRIEND LOVES THE THREE HOLES TO CHOOSE FROM
DO YOU KNOW THE DEFINTION OF INSURRECTION, NUMBNUTS?maineman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ do you know what the words "seditious conspiracy" actually mean?
I will take your dodging my question by asking one of your own as proof that you KNOW you got your *** handed to you.righteous » 04 Aug 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ DO YOU KNOW THE DEFINTION OF INSURRECTION, NUMBNUTS?
APPARENTLY NOT
YOU are a goddamn ****, liberal, LYING idiot!!!Squatchman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ They already identified who dropped the toots.
But they figure with all the other sentences coming down a simple possession charge on trump would be silly at this point.
That's what democrats charge when they want to subvert the Bill of Rights.maineman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ do you know what the words "seditious conspiracy" actually mean?
but, to answer your dodging question: Yes, I do. It is a violent uprising against an authority or government. January 6th was certainly all that.righteous » 04 Aug 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ DO YOU KNOW THE DEFINTION [SIC] OF INSURRECTION, NUMBNUTS?
APPARENTLY NOT
...and juries of your peers found your fellow insurrectionists guilty. imagine that.RebelGator » 04 Aug 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ That's what democrats charge when they want to subvert the Bill of Rights.
Does it mean you got him now?maineman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ do you know what the words "seditious conspiracy" actually mean?

Peers??? There is no such thing as an impartial jury of one's peers if he is a republican in DC. DC is a **** of ****, liberal, dim-0-crap idiots!!!maineman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ ...and juries of your peers found your fellow insurrectionists guilty. imagine that.
Their lawyers could have fixed that during voir dire.Buffalo » 04 Aug 2023, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Peers??? There is no such thing as an impartial jury of one's peers if he is a republican in DC. DC is a **** of ****, liberal, dim-0-crap idiots!!!
There is NO way a fair and impartial jury for a republican could be selected in DC!!! A change of venue would have helped. DC is just a **** of ****, liberal, dim-0-crap, idiots. This whole sham persecution of American citizens with rights is a sad indication of the banana republic the US has become. Proof that braindead biden's bureaucratic apparatchiks will do anything to stay on power. Trump and his supporters terrify them.
maineman » 04 Aug 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ ...and juries of your peers found your fellow insurrectionists guilty. imagine that.
Giving Jill some attentionRedheadedStranger » 04 Aug 2023, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ What was Trump doing in Biden's WH a couple of weeks ago?
Buffalo » 04 Aug 2023, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Peers??? There is no such thing as an impartial jury of one's peers if he is a republican in DC. DC is a **** of ****, liberal, dim-0-crap idiots!!!

your peers are in the county lockup.
you are certainly entitled to hold that opinion... as misguided and unsupported as it isBuffalo » 04 Aug 2023, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ There is NO way a fair and impartial jury for a republican could be selected in DC!!! A change of venue would have helped. DC is just a **** of ****, liberal, dim-0-crap, idiots. This whole sham persecution of American citizens with rights is a sad indication of the banana republic the US has become. Proof that braindead biden's bureaucratic apparatchiks will do anything to stay on power. Trump and his supporters terrify them.
The dangermaineman » 04 Aug 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ you are certainly entitled to hold that opinion... as misguided and unsupported as it is