water cooler thread.dickens » 30 Jan 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Jascha Heifetz was called the emperor of the violin by the media. But does he deserve the title? This experiment will help to find out. Here are two performances of the same musical piece ( Brahms violin concerto, third part). One is by Heifetz (I'll not tell you which), another by a female violinist you never heard about. I suggest that you after blind listening tell which performance is better. It would be good if you also explain your choice in a posting.
First performance
Second performance
Changed the links to https in the OP. Should be fine now.
Looks like you successfully suppressed it.
I have had enough of mine sent there, I learned to sense what gets removed from NHB, especially when it debunks humanity across the board and around the globe.
But can you sense which is the famous violinist performance?omh » 01 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I have had enough of mine sent there, I learned to sense what gets removed from NHB, especially when it debunks humanity across the board and around the globe.
It will have political consequences when there will be test results.omh » 01 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑this thread does nothing of the sort. doesn't even become near relative to purpose of politics.
why would want too?dickens » 06 Feb 2022, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑ But can you sense which is the famous violinist performance?
It will have political consequences when there will be test results.
To help Science. You already served as a guinea pig to test experimental vaccine. Help Science once more.
so what. Every ancestor born is a social psychological guinea pig to those governing concepts of mind over matter, context rules content, symbolism over substance, reality controls free will choices to obey specific limitations or one's own society devalues one into executed to save humanity.dickens » 12 Feb 2022, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ To help Science. You already served as a guinea pig to test experimental vaccine. Help Science once more.
So you already know that there is no substance to Heifetz?
Quit fiddling around.dickens » 23 May 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ So you already know that there is no substance to Heifetz?
That's what you are doing. Lot's of comments without answering the question in the OP.
the asked questions with common answers they have to be constant physically evolving results to answer with. Speculation of events until social fruition isn't discussing naturally evolving in plain sight.dickens » 15 Jul 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ That's what you are doing. Lot's of comments without answering the question in the OP.