Liberal Forum

Libs on this forum love to criticize Fox news, yet they are the only ones reporting the Durham investigation. Even if the MSM thinks it's false they should still report on it. By not doing so they're only admitting that there's something there and they don't want to admit it.

 

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am

Libs on this forum love to criticize Fox news, yet they are the only ones reporting the Durham investigation. Even if the MSM thinks it's false they should still report on it. By not doing so they're only admitting that there's something there and they don't want to admit it.

It will come up but it looks like politicized BS so far.

https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/l ... -02-14.pdf

 

Pengwin » 15 Feb 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:15 am

It will come up but it looks like politicized BS so far.

https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/l ... -02-14.pdf

The courts will decide. 

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am

Libs on this forum love to criticize Fox news, yet they are the only ones reporting the Durham investigation. Even if the MSM thinks it's false they should still report on it. By not doing so they're only admitting that there's something there and they don't want to admit it.

 

 

Over the weekend none were reporting it.  Today there are some stories.  

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:21 am

The courts will decide.

Tell that to Trump and all the right-wing media jerking off about this BS.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:21 am

The courts will decide.

Oh no no no....that's not how it works. You see, Pigwen thinks that whatever he decides, that's how it should. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:22 am

Over the weekend none were reporting it.  Today there are some stories.

I went to all five of those station's websites and the only one that mentioned it was MSNBC but they were debunking it and also they had it blocked and I didn't want to do whatever was necessary to read it. 

When I went to CBS I entered Durham in their search and the earliest story was from last September when that lawyer was subpoenaed.

I turned on the View to see if they would mention it and they have yet to and I'm sure they won't. They did, however, say that America is reverting to the Jim Crow era. 

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:42 am

I went to all five of those station's websites and the only one that mentioned it was MSNBC but they were debunking it and also they had it blocked and I didn't want to do whatever was necessary to read it. 

When I went to CBS I entered Durham in their search and the earliest story was from last September when that lawyer was subpoenaed.

I turned on the View to see if they would mention it and they have yet to and I'm sure they won't. They did, however, say that America is reverting to the Jim Crow era.

I just went to Google and typed Durham and Durham Filing.  I didn't read them but saw a couple outlets with headlines.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:54 am

I just went to Google and typed Durham and Durham Filing.  I didn't read them but saw a couple outlets with headlines.

I followed your lead and did the same. Yes there are some agencies finally reporting it. Of course from what I read they're claiming her campaign was not involved. We'll probably just have to hope that republicans can take over congress in November.

Because it's a big nothing burger.

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 10:48 am

Libs on this forum love to criticize Fox news, yet they are the only ones reporting the Durham investigation. Even if the MSM thinks it's false they should still report on it. By not doing so they're only admitting that there's something there and they don't want to admit it.

I'm pleased that you are finally pulling back the curtain on the magic that makes you so smart, Ruby...


 

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm

I followed your lead and did the same. Yes there are some agencies finally reporting it. Of course from what I read they're claiming her campaign was not involved. We'll probably just have to hope that republicans can take over congress in November.

Of course from what I read they're claiming her campaign was not involved. We'll probably just have to hope that republicans can take over congress in November.

because only then, after 3 long years, can we finally fashion the truth?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:31 pm

because only then, after 3 long years, can we finally fashion the truth?

What truth do you want to fashion?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm

I'm pleased that you are finally pulling back the curtain on the magic that makes you so smart, Ruby...

Who's Ruby?
 

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:33 pm

Who's Ruby?

Bingo.
 
 

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:33 pm

What truth do you want to fashion?

No, rock...I'm not the one pining for the return of the Inquisition.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:35 pm

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:33 pm

What truth do you want to fashion?

No, rock...I'm not the one pining for the return of the Inquisition.

 

Some day you will learn that everyone is not like you.  Many of us will look for multiple stories concerning an issue, particularly one that is "sensational". 

We will check multiple outlets, left and right, or wait, to avoid debacles like the Duetsche Bank Subpoena debacle. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:46 pm

Some day you will learn that everyone is not like you.  Many of us will look for multiple stories concerning an issue, particularly one that is "sensational". 

We will check multiple outlets, left and right, or wait, to avoid debacles like the Duetsche Bank Subpoena debacle.

Of course....so would you give us this minute's version of what informed your most recent sensational narrative?

to avoid debacles like the Duetsche Bank Subpoena debacle.

Every time I think of it, water rises to my eyes.


https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/06/trumps- ... utors.htmlTrump's lender Deutsche Bank subpoenaed by NYC prosecutors, hands over documents, report says

Bloomberg app · 
Trump Nears Deal With House on Deutsche Bank Subpoenas

https://fortune.com/2021/02/04/trumps-d ... eal-probe/Trump’s banker at Deutsche Bank resigned amid a property deal probe

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/12/investin ... index.htmlDeutsche Bank won't do any more business with Trump
 

Squatchman » 15 Feb 2022, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:01 pm

Because it's a big nothing burger.

What link can you provide that proves that?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 1:22 pm

Of course....so would you give us this minute's version of what informed your most recent sensational narrative?

Every time I think of it, water rises to my eyes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/06/trumps- ... utors.htmlTrump's lender Deutsche Bank subpoenaed by NYC prosecutors, hands over documents, report says

Bloomberg app · 
Trump Nears Deal With House on Deutsche Bank Subpoenas

https://fortune.com/2021/02/04/trumps-d ... eal-probe/Trump’s banker at Deutsche Bank resigned amid a property deal probe

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/12/investin ... index.htmlDeutsche Bank won't do any more business with Trump

Lmao!  That is. Not the Dec 17 story where they had to issue a correction.  Nice lie!