Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:25 pm

But that is the answer.

You can’t back up your statement that my narrative was cockeyed.  You keep on running, Forrest.

Dwarf,

We've had

1) no other sources

2) yes. Other sources

3) no other sources

4) yes. Other sources, but all the same.


Just post the **** links, and we'll figure it out.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:27 pm

Dwarf,

We've had

1) no other sources

2) yes. Other sources

3) no other sources

4) yes. Other sources, but all the same.

Just post the **** links, and we'll figure it out.

I also looked at the NY Post.  But, who owns the post?  Same story.

There is no **** links, to idiot.  

You still can’t explain why my narrative is cockeyed or challenge it.

Idiot, there is another thread on the forum that discussed the lack of coverage.  

I can do this all week simply to prove you are more interested in disrupting discussions by attacking sources and posters. 

Your call. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm

I also looked at the NY Post.  But, who owns the post?  Same story.

There is no **** links, to idiot.  

You still can’t explain why my narrative is cockeyed or challenge it.

Idiot, there is another thread on the forum that discussed the lack of coverage.  

I can do this all week simply to prove you are more interested in disrupting discussions by attacking sources and posters. 

Your call.

Dwarf,

I accept the fact that you would be dumb enough to look at numerous versions of the same thing and need days to figure that out.

But I want to see the sources you admit you used....not a vague description.
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:34 pm

I also looked at the NY Post.  But, who owns the post?  Same story.

There is no **** links, to idiot.  

You still can’t explain why my narrative is cockeyed or challenge it.

Idiot, there is another thread on the forum that discussed the lack of coverage.  

I can do this all week simply to prove you are more interested in disrupting discussions by attacking sources and posters. 

Your call.

Idiot, there is another thread on the forum that discussed the lack of coverage

Is the OP a well known FOX sockpuppet?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm

Dwarf,

I accept the fact that you would be dumb enough to look at numerous versions of the same thing and need days to figure that out.

But I want to see the sources you admit you used....not a vague description.

No, I figured out at the same time I was looking at it, Forrest.

You have seen the source I said I used.  In the op.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:40 pm

Is the OP a well known FOX sockpuppet?

Read my sig about your rule.  But for you, the face of stupid, the article in The OP links to Fox.  Obviously you did not read it. As usual.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.

All week, Forrest.  Keep running.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:48 pm

Read my sig about your rule. But for you, the face of stupid, the article in The OP links to Fox.  Obviously you did not read it. As usual.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.

All week, Forrest.  Keep running.

Don't open with lies.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:50 pm

Don't open with lies.

1.  The link in the op links to fox.  No lie,

2.  The fact you did not know this shows you did not read it.  No lie.

2.  My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.  No lie.

Post fail, Forrest.
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:51 pm

1.  The link in the op links to fox.  No lie,

2.  The fact you did not know this shows you did not read it.  No lie.

2.  My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.  No lie.

Post fail, Forrest.

Whose rule, Sheilagh?

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:51 pm

1.  The link in the op links to fox.  No lie,

2.  The fact you did not know this shows you did not read it.  No lie.

2.  My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.  No lie.

Post fail, Forrest.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.  No lie.

You're lying.

You should have that looked at.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm

You're lying.

You should have that looked at.

No.  

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.  You have as yet to offer any facts.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:54 pm

No.  

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.  You have as yet to offer any facts.

You've been being bloodied by  @Crazytrain  

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:54 am

I just went to Google and typed Durham and Durham Filing.  I didn't read them but saw a couple outlets with headlines.

https://resulthunter.com/?utm_source=bi ... 6583f7e1ad

Rock » 15 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm

I followed your lead and did the same. Yes there are some agencies finally reporting it. Of course from what I read they're claiming her campaign was not involved. We'll probably just have to hope that republicans can take over congress in November.

https://resulthunter.com/?utm_source=bi ... 6583f7e1ad

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 3:46 pm

No, I figured out at the same time I was looking at it, Forrest.

You have seen the source I said I used.  In the op.

My narrative, regardless of what you think the source is, remains unchallenged.

No, I figured out at the same time I was looking at it, Forrest.

Not in the original version..


Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.

It's not.  I have read a few sources. 

If they are all the same story, on how many sources is your narrative based?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:11 pm

Not in the original version..

Fine.

Just state that the OP is your only source for the narrative.

If they are all the same story, on how many sources is your narrative based?

Read my sign for you rule on questions.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:12 pm

Read my sign for you rule on questions.

I have no rule.

You must be lying.


 

Oh the liberal news is all over it.

They just had to wade through the right wing **** first.

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:14 pm

Oh the liberal news is all over it.

They just had to wade through the right wing **** first.

These idiots STILL can't figure out why it was released late Friday.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:01 pm

You've been being bloodied by  @Crazytrain

 Nope.  Damn, you are trolling me elsewhere.  You are more than welcome to take one of my exchanges with CT and back up your allegation.