Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:21 pm

 Nope.  Damn, you are trolling me elsewhere.  You are more than welcome to take one of my exchanges with CT and back up your allegation.

So you can take a runner, deny it ever happened, dwarfsplain', or post the wave smilie?
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:27 pm

So you can take a runner, deny it ever happened, dwarfsplain', or post the wave smilie?

I’m right here ready to defend all I have posted.   Bring it on, Forrest.  As usual, I got all week.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:29 pm

I’m right here ready to defend all I have posted.   Bring it on, Forrest.  As usual, I got all week.

You mean you got all weak. 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:29 pm

I’m right here ready to defend all I have posted.   Bring it on, Forrest.  As usual, I got all week.

Would you like to see fresh evidence to the contrary?

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm

You mean you got all weak.

Why should anyone believe someone who lies about why he doesn't answer questions?

@Huey  
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:31 pm

Would you like to see fresh evidence to the contrary?

As I said, Capt Redundant, bring it on.  Jeez, you’re an idiot,

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:38 pm

As I said, Capt Redundant, bring it on.  Jeez, you’re an idiot,

Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:33 pm

Why should anyone believe someone who lies about why he doesn't answer questions?

@Huey

 Bring it on.  Waiting for you Dumb, to support Dumber’s accusations.

Crazytrain » 15 Feb 2022, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:39 pm

Researching DNS lookups is not hacking a server. It is tracking the pattern of connections between servers and computers or smartphones. Much of this information—DNS logs—is not private. The researchers examining the DNS data were not infiltrating anything. Lawyers for Joffe and David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the research Sussmann shared with the CIA, have challenged Durham’s representations. Dagon’s attorneys note that the DNS logs examined related to the Russian phone service came from the time of Barack Obama’s presidency. That appears credible, given that Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA was only three weeks after Trump had taken office. And they told the New York Times that Dagon and associates were using “nonprivate” DNS data and “were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign.”Joffe, too, says that this research was focused on whether Russian malware had infected the White House and the Trump campaign. (Trump’s campaign office was in Trump Tower.) As the New York Times reports,

Your brother, dumber, tried that already.  He failed.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:38 pm

As I said, Capt Redundant, bring it on.  Jeez, you’re an idiot,

viewtopic.php?p=1949696#p1949696
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:39 pm

 Bring it on.  Waiting for you Dumb, to support Dumber’s accusations.

Post the rule, and your stipulation.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:40 pm

Your brother, dumber, tried that already.  He failed.

How does this "fail"?

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:40 pm

viewtopic.php?p=1949696#p1949696

And still unchallenged.  You came here to reframe.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:41 pm

Post the rule, and your stipulation.

Sorry, you made a claim.   No need for rules and stipulations on my part, Askholio.

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm

How does this "fail"?

I told you what to read,

 
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 11:21 am

The courts will decide.

@Blackvegetable  

@Crazytrain  
 

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm

And still unchallenged.  You came here to reframe.

Are these your words, Idiot?

As I said, Capt Redundant, bring it on.  Jeez, you’re an idiot,

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Feb 2022, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:51 pm

Are these your words, Idiot?

Still waiting, Askholio.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:50 pm

I told you what to read,

If I am looking for direction, I'll ask for it.

Otherwise answer the question asked.

The first time.

Huey » 15 Feb 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Feb 2022, 4:52 pm

Still waiting, Askholio.

As demonstrated, pointless.