I decapitated her attorney just before the judge grabbed his gavel.Pepperluciophobia » 03 Jun 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ He doesn't know the difference between a gun and a holster.
He knows nothing about woman other than his ex was a splooge receptacle that took his seed and then divorced him and took his money.
When you're a Mac, it's instinct.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ But you can't define "woman". How do you know what you are looking at is a women?
Nope. If you can't define "woman" you can't say you have been with any.Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑When you're a Mac, it's instinct.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ But you can't define "woman". How do you know what you are looking at is a women?
I don't need a manual.
That is an unambiguously stated position.
But he sure picks out a good pair of womans sneakers.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ But you can't define "woman". How do you know what you are looking at is a women?
As with everything else, that is not for you to determine.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. If you can't define "woman" you can't say you have been with any.
Stay down, Vic.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑That is an unambiguously stated position.
And look, it is informed by a Principle.
WTF?
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑As with everything else, that is not for you to determine.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. If you can't define "woman" you can't say you have been with any.
How many hours each week does that troll on FOX riff on this?
No....it is what I said it was.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, and it is exactly what I said it was. You support women (a term you can't define) choosing abortion at ANY TIME in the pregnancy.
No need to speak any more. The record is clear.
Please, Usefool.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑No....it is what I said it was.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, and it is exactly what I said it was. You support women (a term you can't define) choosing abortion at ANY TIME in the pregnancy.
No need to speak any more. The record is clear.
Remember, this is a one for one scenario. You have to define woman first. I have made that quite clear. Then mention the name of who you are diverting with.
Don't yap.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Remember, this is a one for one scenario. You have to define woman first. I have made that quite clear. Then mention the name of who you are diverting with.
You first.Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑Don't yap.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Remember, this is a one for one scenario. You have to define woman first. I have made that quite clear. Then mention the name of who you are diverting with.
Get it done.
Here's another example of The Problem.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑No....it is what I said it was.Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, and it is exactly what I said it was. You support women (a term you can't define) choosing abortion at ANY TIME in the pregnancy.
No need to speak any more. The record is clear.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑Here's another example of The Problem.
My position is clearly stated and tethered to a principle.
You are leaking from the yap.
No.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ No.
Dwarf,
It is so painfully obvious who is inspiring you to ask me to define "woman".
Now stipulate to it and we can move on.