Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm

I am 56 years old.  I have known what a women is for a very long time.  Obviously you struggle with that.  I don't need to be influenced.  But your confusion shows someone needs to have an influence on you because your current influencers are not doing a good job.

I've never had to ask myself the question.

But suddenly you do..

 
 

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm

You are realizing you are defeated.

No....you are realizing that your rhetorical stratagem sucks.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm

Deeze,

There isn't much variety in your output.

You're angry.

I get that..

What else?

Me? Angry?
How about I just don't like you?
Are you too stupid to remember I told you that more than once?

Why do you suck so much?
Is scatology your only hobby, ****?

Does variety mean that I don't ask questions?
Can you ever get to the point?

Why are you such a ****?

Vegas » 03 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

Look at this piece of dog **** hide again...and again....

Darth Evader is out in full force. 

Die coward.

It's logic, you would have no way of understanding. 

DeezerShoove » 03 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm

Me? Angry?
How about I just don't like you?
Are you too stupid to remember I told you that more than once?

Why do you suck so much?
Is scatology your only hobby, ****?

Does variety mean that I don't ask questions?
Can you ever get to the point?

Why are you such a ****?

Didn't exactly raise the bar...

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:05 pm

Didn't exactly raise the bar...

Pulling your bar out of a latrine isn't my concern.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm

What ever happened to safe, legal and rare?

Certainly not gonna be helped by prudes dictating educational curricula.

You should consider the rhetorical dishonesty inherent in your aggregation. This is a choice made by individual women, not one of whom bears any responsibility to, or for, the collective.

 

So we are back to your answer.  You support a women choosing an abortion past 20 weeks.  You can play semantics all you want.  

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm

I am 56 years old.  I have known what a women is for a very long time.  Obviously you struggle with that.  I don't need to be influenced.  But your confusion shows someone needs to have an influence on you because your current influencers are not doing a good job.

I've never had to ask myself the question.

But suddenly you do..

 
 

 

You can't articulate it.  

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:53 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm

You are realizing you are defeated.

No....you are realizing that your rhetorical stratagem sucks.

 

Nah, you are doing what you do when cornered.  Reframing. 

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm

Nah, you are doing what you do when cornered.  Reframing.

No, Tiny.

You are reframing my position.

I'm offering a perfect analog.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm

Nah, you are doing what you do when cornered.  Reframing.

No, Tiny.

You are reframing my position.

I'm offering a perfect analog.
 

 

I have not reframed your position.  I posted your words verbatim and complete with a link.  Unlike you do. 

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm

I have not reframed your position.  I posted your words verbatim and complete with a link.  Unlike you do.

Dwarf,

Verbatim is vebatim.

You are laboring a CONSEQUENCE of the principle.

I'm doing the same.

Whether or not you grasp that is irrelevant. 

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:05 pm

It's logic, you would have no way of understanding.

You don't know the meaning of the word. 

You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy. That's your idea of logic. 

Kill yourself today. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm

I have not reframed your position.  I posted your words verbatim and complete with a link.  Unlike you do.

Dwarf,

Verbatim is vebatim.

You are laboring a CONSEQUENCE of the principle.

I'm doing the same.

Whether or not you grasp that is irrelevant. 

Nod.
 

 

Your principle is, VERBATIM:

As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.

Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."

You can play semantics all you like if it makes you sleep better at night.  

PS.  What is vebatim?


 

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm

Your principle is, VERBATIM:

As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.

Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."

You can play semantics all you like if it makes you sleep better at night.  

PS.  What is vebatim?

This is the Principle at issue.

You can assume it is so because it is so labeled. 

As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.

This is the Consequence 

Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."

Do you understand the distinction?

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:46 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm

Your principle is, VERBATIM:

As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.

Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."

You can play semantics all you like if it makes you sleep better at night.  

PS.  What is vebatim?

This is the Principle at issue.

You can assume it is so because it is so labeled. 

As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.

This is the Consequence 

Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."

Do you understand the distinction?

 

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM? 

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:49 pm

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM?

Dwarf,

You don't understand the distinction.

Because you're a sockpuppet.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:52 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:49 pm

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM?

Dwarf,

You don't understand the distinction.

Because you're a sockpuppet.


 

 

You recall the direct answer to my question?  

Same answer:

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM?

​​​​​​​

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm

You recall the direct answer to my question?  

Same answer:

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM?

 

Dwarf,

It is, not at all unlike school massacres, a CONSEQUENCE. 
​​​​​​​
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:56 pm

Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm

You recall the direct answer to my question?  

Same answer:

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM?


 

Dwarf,

It is, not at all unlike school massacres, a CONSEQUENCE. 

 

 

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

You did not say a consequence.  You said the DIRECT was YES, anytime.  Maybe you should think before you type.