Liberal Forum

Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 10:08 am

Nah, you're the issue, not us.

The Issue, as repeatedly demonstrated, is yours in both the aggregate and granular.


 

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 10:16 am

The Issue, as repeatedly demonstrated, is yours in both the aggregate and granular.

I don't really care about your opinion on this.  Just understand every time I answer I expect an acknowledgement.  Whether you like the answer or not.  

Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 10:17 am

I don't really care about your opinion on this.  Just understand every time I answer I expect an acknowledgement.  Whether you like the answer or not.

No....either there is a rule, or there isn't, Princess.

Post it, and your stipulation.




 

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 10:19 am

No....either there is a rule, or there isn't, Princess.

Post it, and your stipulation.




 

 

Nah, I am not taking demands today.  If we are done with Colt discussion there is no need for you to try to turn this into a personal flame war.  
 

Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 10:25 am

Nah, I am not taking demands today. If we are done with Colt discussion there is no need for you to try to turn this into a personal flame war.

Princess,

You only issue them.

Now, run.

Again.
 

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 10:27 am

Princess,

You only issue them.

Now, run.

Again.
 

 

Princess?  You are not even original.  As Tavy would say you stole that.  

R.Suave » 12 Jan 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 9:59 am

Why are you compelled to play  @Huey  's even more witless echo?

I'm not even reading y'all's exchange, and typically don't.

They are rather boring and redundant to be honest.

My opinions are my own.
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm

I'm not even reading y'all's exchange, and typically don't.

They are rather boring and redundant to be honest.

My opinions are my own.

         and it never ends... over and over again. 
 

RedheadedStranger » 12 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm

I'm not even reading y'all's exchange, and typically don't.

They are rather boring and redundant to be honest.

My opinions are my own.

I don't read any more than necessary to ascertain that they are still pissing on each other's shoe.
There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument that until they resolve that neither knows the details and there are too many assumptions bandied about, they're disagreeing about fantasy.
I did try to put some logic in there though. Ignored because they gots bigger fish to fry.
Then they move on to their pet project of Rules and Acknowledgement.

I think they should meet, have a drink, ****, then be done with each other.  
 

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm

I don't read any more than necessary to ascertain that they are still pissing on each other's shoe.
There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument that until they resolve that neither knows the details and there are too many assumptions bandied about, they're disagreeing about fantasy.
I did try to put some logic in there though. Ignored because they gots bigger fish to fry.
Then they move on to their pet project of Rules and Acknowledgement.

I think they should meet, have a drink, ****, then be done with each other.

i think you should make them their own forum room....  .
 

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm

I don't read any more than necessary to ascertain that they are still pissing on each other's shoe.
There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument that until they resolve that neither knows the details and there are too many assumptions bandied about, they're disagreeing about fantasy.
I did try to put some logic in there though. Ignored because they gots bigger fish to fry.
Then they move on to their pet project of Rules and Acknowledgement.

I think they should meet, have a drink, ****, then be done with each other.

Just of it as me providing a public service to the forum.  If I didn't tie him up he would be after all of you.  

Huey » 12 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:39 pm

Just of it as me providing a public service to the forum.  If I didn't tie him up he would be after all of you.

I was thinking of the fatigue you must feel.
I have argued with a rotten stump. It takes a long time for it to go away.  

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm

I was thinking of the fatigue you must feel.
I have argued with a rotten stump. It takes a long time for it to go away.

 

Skans » 12 Jan 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 9:17 am

Kahr K9.  And have a smith add Here's why:

• Double Action Only - less chance of unintentionally pulling the trigger
• Easy gun to rack slide
• Slim grip
• Very reliable, robust, well-made durable gun
• Manageable recoil - 9mm
• Easy to find fairly priced used ones

Here's how I know.  I gave my wife over 10 handguns to try out.  Out of the 10, the 3 easiest to operate were 1) Kahr K9 and 2) Early Dan Wesson 357; 3) Boberg XR9s.  The Dan Wesson was too heavy and had too much kick.  Here's some other interesting information:

• The Walther PPK 380 was one of the harder guns to rack the slide - she couldn't do it
• The Glock was difficult for her to rack the slide
• S&W J-Frame Chief's special didn't fit her hand well, and trigger pull was too heavy.

The only other gun she could operate as well (maybe better) than the Kahr K9 was a Boberg (Bond Arms) XR9-s.  But, that one's mine, and if she wanted one of those, I'd have to find her one.

Skans what do you know about the Taurus 9mm  ...?
The G2 model in particular. 
A little ole lady I know with tiny but strong hands might like one for Valentines Day

 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm

Skans what do you know about the Taurus 9mm  ...?
The G2 model in particular. 
A little ole lady I know with tiny but strong hands might like one for Valentines Day

Unfortunately, I am not all that familiar with the Taurus G2.  I haven't had any range time with it and haven't disassembled one. Wish I could be more helpful than that, but if I haven't handled it, I don't feel its fair saying anything about it.

It's been quite some time since I've owned any Taurus handguns.  What they are turning out today is much different than what they were making decades ago, in a good way.
 

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm

I don't read any more than necessary to ascertain that they are still pissing on each other's shoe.
There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument that until they resolve that neither knows the details and there are too many assumptions bandied about, they're disagreeing about fantasy.
I did try to put some logic in there though. Ignored because they gots bigger fish to fry.
Then they move on to their pet project of Rules and Acknowledgement.

I think they should meet, have a drink, ****, then be done with each other.

IT IS HARD TO HIT @R. Suave  SHOES.
TINY FEET
 

Skans » 12 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm

Unfortunately, I am not all that familiar with the Taurus G2.  I haven't had any range time with it and haven't disassembled one. Wish I could be more helpful than that, but if I haven't handled it, I don't feel its fair saying anything about it.

It's been quite some time since I've owned any Taurus handguns.  What they are turning out today is much different than what they were making decades ago, in a good way.

Thanks..!
I imagine with CNC and other advances they can churn out a better  combo of quantity and quality.
Our local gun range  guys probably get asked this question 365 days a year so I'll give them a try.

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jan 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:06 pm

Thanks..!
I imagine with CNC and other advances they can churn out a better  combo of quantity and quality.
Our local gun range  guys probably get asked this question 365 days a year so I'll give them a try.
 

This is why I like to disassemble nearly every gun I can get my hands on, or at least look at pictures and videos online that show high-res images of the internal components.  I will occasionally buy an older gun just to see how it was made and how it disassembles.


 

Skans » 12 Jan 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 1:12 pm

This is why I like to disassemble nearly every gun I can get my hands on, or at least look at pictures and videos online that show high-res images of the internal components.  I will occasionally buy an older gun just to see how it was made and how it disassembles.

Good point. 
It takes an "acquired feel" for how things should fit and the experience to known where most problems are bound to occur over time.
I'm familiar with model airplane engines, which in many ways are built to the same standards as hand guns.

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm

I don't read any more than necessary to ascertain that they are still pissing on each other's shoe.
There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument that until they resolve that neither knows the details and there are too many assumptions bandied about, they're disagreeing about fantasy.
I did try to put some logic in there though. Ignored because they gots bigger fish to fry.
Then they move on to their pet project of Rules and Acknowledgement.

I think they should meet, have a drink, ****, then be done with each other.

There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument that until they resolve that neither knows the details and there are too many assumptions bandied about, they're disagreeing about fantasy.
I did try to put some logic in there though

Coozie,

You're a lying idiot.