I like to see if a gun is over-engineered or under engineered, as well as what level of finishing it has. The hard thing with the newer guns/rifles is the plastic and integration of steel with the plastic parts. With plastic, only time will tell. I have a 2nd Gen Glock (2-pin Glock) that was mfg 1991. I used to shoot it a lot and carried it in my car for years. Plastic and metal is still near perfect. Now, that's a testament to Gaston Glock's tough-as-nails pistols.GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jan 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Good point.
It takes an "acquired feel" for how things should fit and the experience to known where most problems are bound to occur over time.
I'm familiar with model airplane engines, which in many ways are built to the same standards as hand guns.
Start withDeezerShoove » 13 Jan 2024, 12:42 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, right. I'll bet you can't point out one.
Issue resolved.
There isn't a **** thing you "know" that hasn't been covered.There so many details left out in the Ruger-makes-a-Colt argument
R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ Start with
There isn't a **** thing you "know" that hasn't been covered.
nod.
R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ Start with
There isn't a **** thing you "know" that hasn't been covered.
nod.
And you can't read.
Give me an example of what you believe I've "missed"?DeezerShoove » 13 Jan 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ So, your flailing like this is you failing like this.
You really let your last word fetish **** you up.
When you have nothing to say, just say that: nothing.
Melt down quietly...DeezerShoove » 13 Jan 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ **** you, stupid.
Who the hell reads your stupid **** enough to know that?
Go back to your pissing contest, Gun Master.
btw
I posted a logical critique with examples and you didn't reply to that.
Why? Because you're just a little ****. (Sorry to the chickens out there.)
Cherrypicking **** like you are so easy to dismiss.
See what I mean? A defenseless idiot, you are.
Your vague description of your own words is irrelevant.DeezerShoove » 13 Jan 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ See what I mean? A defenseless idiot, you are.
Go back to my description of "revision" vs "new part".
Tear it apart. Show me what you got, spineless.
I even invited experts like you to dig into it.
You always have nothing. Show me I'm wrong.
No...can't be bothered with ****.Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ When you start using strike thru it is a sign your heart exploded.
R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ No...can't be bothered with ****.
I can tell it at a glance..
R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Your vague description of your own words is irrelevant.
Your own words are irrelevant.
What you can support with citations matters.
Ya follah, gasbag?
I don't rely on Narrative.Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you bought every thing you have been told by politicians about not only firearms but COVID as well. You are ****.
TH, DRDeezerShoove » 13 Jan 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ You aren't worth trying to be serious with at all.
That simple version of something I know quite well was too much for you.
Find ANYTHING or ANYONE that can dispute what I said.
I'm willing to learn. You are not. That's why you fail here so much.
You are wedded to being a Chat Room Champ. Futile asshole.
Unless you back up your big words here, you just were handed your own ***. As usual.
Resolved.