Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 11:02 am

Your vague description of your own words is irrelevant.

Your own words are irrelevant.

What you can support with citations matters.

Ya follah, gasbag?

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 9:53 am

You guys...
Page after page of this ****.  

Here's a manufacturing fork in the road for you both:
   -Fit.    -Form.    -Function.
If any one of those three alters a part such that it is no longer interchangeable or ceases to perform as required, it gets a new part number. If any one of those three is changed and there is no effect to the product's use or purpose, it is a revision.

Example for the brain-limited:
A finish or coating may have no apparent effect except it is a revised chemical makeup at its point of manufacture. Perhaps it's better or cheaper to produce.
A revision to the end product.
-or-
A hole is added for a pin needed for certain models. If the hole impedes the production or end use of the item, it needs to be sorted properly to not get mixed with the original design. Technically interchangeability no longer exists.
New part number required. (Original and original with hole).

Even changing the material (cold roll, hot roll, stainless, etc) and the parts are still interchangeable, they will not perform the same. New part number. The end product is NOT the same.

In your pissing contest, try to think of using  +p+ ammo in a decades old gun. It is possible that the pressures can cause a structural failure. The material just wasn't designed with that performance requirement. Even if that old gun was stored unfired, having no metal fatigue.

----

A very simplified rendition. You are welcome to pick at it but I hope this helps frame your pissing contest a little better.

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm

And yet the majority of what you offer is offered without a citation.

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm

No, projectolad...that is a lie.

Blackvegetable » 04 Jun 2022, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jun 2022, 9:24 pm

She didn't take much money, and I raised my seed..

Double fail.

How many guns to fill the void of involuntary virginity?

Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm

No way you raised your daughter, liar. Your knife in her back is exhibit one against THAT false narrative.

SOCKSAVINGS » 13 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm

Hello friend

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:28 pm

Nope.

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:28 pm

Nope.

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 12:24 pm

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 11:02 am

Your vague description of your own words is irrelevant.

Your own words are irrelevant.

What you can support with citations matters.

Ya follah, gasbag?

And yet the majority of what you offer is offered without a citation.

 

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 1:41 pm

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm

Full circle.

When pic of not Donald Trump arrives we know the MeltDown is in full swing.

 

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 1:56 pm

Who tells you that it isn't Grifty under the toilet brush hat?

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm

Why should I care and why do you take this so seriously?  Particularly when you already have my answers.  

Now you are recycling old arguments to get attention.  Go find that thread.

And go outside.  You need a break

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm

No, lying little piece of ****...

I am showing you another example of your projection pathology.

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 2:50 pm

LMAO! 

You can't remember we had this argument.  

@Vegas

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 2:50 pm

LMAO! 

You can't remember we had this argument.  

@Vegas

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 2:57 pm

Do answer the question.

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 2:56 pm

It's evidence....in your words..

Not a retelling.

Don't bother @Vegas  ...he's bleeding out.

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 3:01 pm

You are more than welcome to bump that thread.  Like the M 16 argument there is a dedicated thread in the water cooler area.  No need to relitigate it here.

R.Suave » 13 Jan 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 3:08 pm

So you admit that you don't have a source.

Huey » 13 Jan 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 3:11 pm

Nompe.  I told you to go find the old thread.

Just what was your recommendation for a compact carry pistol for an older lady?