Liberal Forum

Google engineer warn the firm's AI is sentient: Suspended employee claims  computer programme acts 'like a 7 or 8-year-old' and reveals it told him shutting it off 'would be exactly like death for me. It would scare me a lot'

• Blake Lemoine, 41, a senior software engineer at Google has been testing Google's artificial intelligence tool called LaMDA
• Following hours of conversations with the AI, Lemoine came away with the perception that LaMDA was sentient 
• After presenting his findings to company bosses, Google disagreed with him
• Lemoine then decided to share his conversations with the tool online 
• He was put on paid leave by Google on Monday for violating confidentiality 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tient.html
 
 

nefarious101 » 12 Jun 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 9:55 am

Google engineer warn the firm's AI is sentient: Suspended employee claims  computer programme acts 'like a 7 or 8-year-old' and reveals it told him shutting it off 'would be exactly like death for me. It would scare me a lot'

• Blake Lemoine, 41, a senior software engineer at Google has been testing Google's artificial intelligence tool called LaMDA
• Following hours of conversations with the AI, Lemoine came away with the perception that LaMDA was sentient 
• After presenting his findings to company bosses, Google disagreed with him
• Lemoine then decided to share his conversations with the tool online 
• He was put on paid leave by Google on Monday for violating confidentiality 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tient.html

Can't trust Google.

Here's a better search engine...


https://search.brave.com/

nefarious101 » 12 Jun 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 9:55 am

Google engineer warn the firm's AI is sentient: Suspended employee claims  computer programme acts 'like a 7 or 8-year-old' and reveals it told him shutting it off 'would be exactly like death for me. It would scare me a lot'

• Blake Lemoine, 41, a senior software engineer at Google has been testing Google's artificial intelligence tool called LaMDA
• Following hours of conversations with the AI, Lemoine came away with the perception that LaMDA was sentient 
• After presenting his findings to company bosses, Google disagreed with him
• Lemoine then decided to share his conversations with the tool online 
• He was put on paid leave by Google on Monday for violating confidentiality 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tient.html

Pretty soon we will be seeing robots working with minimum supervision EVERYWHERE.
Much of the manipulation we see being done by the [[[GLOBALIST SOCIAL ENGINEERS]]] today, is preparation for this "new age / industrial revolution".
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:02 am

Pretty soon we will be seeing robots working with minimum supervision EVERYWHERE.
Much of the manipulation we see being done by the [[[GLOBALIST SOCIAL ENGINEERS]]] today, is preparation for this "new age / industrial revolution".

Problem is over population....options are either war, space migration or controlled extermination to whatever is determined to be "sustainable"...which would be a far less number of people than most would think.



The last people that any thinking government would save would be the defective and the dead weight.


 

nefarious101 » 12 Jun 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:11 am

Problem is over population....options are either war, space migration or controlled extermination to whatever is determined to be "sustainable"...which would be a far less number of people than most would think.

The last people that any thinking government would save would be the defective and the dead weight.

When I was born the USA stood at 155 MM and things were a little bit too crowded for my liking back then.
Even back then our wilderness areas were getting ruined by **** and traffic in the big cities was horrible...but it's so much worse now.
There would be so much less competition for shrinking resources if we could shrink back.

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:02 am

Pretty soon we will be seeing robots working with minimum supervision EVERYWHERE.
Much of the manipulation we see being done by the [[[GLOBALIST SOCIAL ENGINEERS]]] today, is preparation for this "new age / industrial revolution".

"Pretty soon we will be seeing robots working with minimum supervision"

You could have just said the White House.     

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:18 am

When I was born the USA stood at 155 MM and things were a little bit too crowded for my liking back then.
Even back then our wilderness areas were getting ruined by **** and traffic in the big cities was horrible...but it's so much worse now.
There would be so much less competition for shrinking resources if we could shrink back.

This has already been projected.
The world's population increase stopped accelerating in the 1960's.

For the thicker individuals: re-read that.

The increase in population has actually slowed for the ensuing decades since.
It is expected to stop increasing and level off at about 9 billion people on Earth.
Supposedly, this will happen during the 2040's.

Whether or not the planet will then begin to rot and population level to decrease is yet to be conjectured seriously by the "experts".

ps
I have grown to despise the very word "sustainable".

pps
The above doesn't take into consideration a mass extinction event.
(such as the current experimental pre-test).

DeezerShoove » 12 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm

This has already been projected.
The world's population increase stopped accelerating in the 1960's.

For the thicker individuals: re-read that.

The increase in population has actually slowed for the ensuing decades since.
It is expected to stop increasing and level off at about 9 billion people on Earth.
Supposedly, this will happen during the 2040's.

Whether or not the planet will then begin to rot and population level to decrease is yet to be conjectured seriously by the "experts".

ps
I have grown to despise the very word "sustainable".

pps
The above doesn't take into consideration a mass extinction event.
(such as the current experimental pre-test).

Can you fit that **** on a sandwich board?

DeezerShoove » 12 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm

This has already been projected.
The world's population increase stopped accelerating in the 1960's.

For the thicker individuals: re-read that.

The increase in population has actually slowed for the ensuing decades since.
It is expected to stop increasing and level off at about 9 billion people on Earth.
Supposedly, this will happen during the 2040's.

Whether or not the planet will then begin to rot and population level to decrease is yet to be conjectured seriously by the "experts".

ps
I have grown to despise the very word "sustainable".

pps
The above doesn't take into consideration a mass extinction event.
(such as the current experimental pre-test).

Total Population of the World by Decade, 1950–2050 (infoplease.com)
Looks pretty steady to me.
Naturally the closer we get to total unsustainability the slower the growth rate will get. This is true everywhere else in nature.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:30 pm

Can you fit that **** on a sandwich board?

You would be the expert.     

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:18 am

When I was born the USA stood at 155 MM and things were a little bit too crowded for my liking back then.
Even back then our wilderness areas were getting ruined by **** and traffic in the big cities was horrible...but it's so much worse now.
There would be so much less competition for shrinking resources if we could shrink back.

yeah....it does make a lot of sense.  war is the only real way to thin the herd....everyone would have basically the same odds of making it thru the thing.  Of course urban would suffer the most severely under any threat.....the fools can't even feed themselves.

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm

Total Population of the World by Decade, 1950–2050 (infoplease.com)
Looks pretty steady to me.
Naturally the closer we get to total unsustainability the slower the growth rate will get. This is true everywhere else in nature.

That chart confirms exactly what I posted.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:30 pm

Can you fit that **** on a sandwich board?

A question from a total moron yet again.
But no rebuttal because it is all true. Every word of it.

You just want to be a little bitch. And you are, ****.

DeezerShoove » 12 Jun 2022, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 6:47 pm

That chart confirms exactly what I posted.

It looked to me you took exception to my post

I pointed out that the rate of growth is unsustainable..but the raw number of additions has remained constant. 
I'd like to see the raw numbers decrease, but no faster than the time it took for our population to double since I was born.

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 7:09 pm

It looked to me you took exception to my post

I pointed out that the rate of growth is unsustainable..but the raw number of additions has remained constant. 
I'd like to see the raw numbers decrease, but no faster than the time it took for our population to double since I was born.

Not exception.

To me some folks miss the distinction between a cease in the acceleration of growth vs a drop in in the total population.
I have had this discussion before and the first time I read about this the author even said it was a point of contention.

There is still an increase in population that is estimated to plateau in about one generation.
Then we will finally reach Utopia: ZPG. 
Happy times for all. 9 billion wandering, functionless, fellow ****...

People will be so miserable they will stop ****.   

Sending people to another planet will never happen.
But if it did by some miracle, it would be .00000001% of us.
 
 

nefarious101 » 12 Jun 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:11 am

Problem is over population....

That is propaganda. All of the facts contradict it. Poverty has decreased by 90% in your lifetime. In your lifetime, life expectancy has DOUBLED in the third world - which is most of the **** world. 

So, you re obviously getting your beliefs - your faith - from CNN. 

You need better sources than CNN. 

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 10:18 am

When I was born the USA stood at 155 MM and things were a little bit too crowded for my liking back then.
Even back then our wilderness areas were getting ruined by **** and traffic in the big cities was horrible...but it's so much worse now.
There would be so much less competition for shrinking resources if we could shrink back.

Something like 5% of land the USA is developed - which means in use by humans for agricutlural, industrial, commercial, military or residential use. 

Resources are not "shrinking." They are simply being wasted, mismanaged, not tapped - not even identified. 

By many accounts there are more trees in America today than there were when columbus landed in the americas. And this is due to human activity. You see, we plant trees - for all KINDS of reasons. Syrup. Fruit. Timber. Arboriculture. Municipal improvement.

Did you know that residential developers must meet quotas of native trees and bushes planted in the yards of every home they sell? Yes - they are required to landscape - they can't just sell you a home without vegetation. 

The trope that we are overpopulated is a purely left wing trope. I am always shocked when I see conservatives parroting that lie. It is anti-Christ in its inception and should be rejected. It calls God's work pollution. We are not a cancer. We are children of God. Only the devil wants you to see yourself and your kind as a problem.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jun 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:30 pm

Can you fit that **** on a sandwich board?

No questions, dick sucker.

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm

Total Population of the World by Decade, 1950–2050 (infoplease.com)
Looks pretty steady to me.
Naturally the closer we get to total unsustainability the slower the growth rate will get. This is true everywhere else in nature.

Do you have any idea how many levels of "unsustainability" we have disproved? How many times we have hit the expert-predicted human population ceiling and burst through it - only to see life spans and overall human wellbeing INCREASE - to see poverty and disease diminish globally?
 

DeezerShoove » 12 Jun 2022, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jun 2022, 6:49 pm

A question from a total moron yet again.
But no rebuttal because it is all true. Every word of it.

You just want to be a little bitch. And you are, ****.

That is what the bring nothing piece of **** does. He PRETENDS to post, PRETENDS to oppose, PRETENDS that he is engaging the material. Being seen making noise - even just fart noise - is his only aim. Actually contributing to the conversation is simply not in the ****'s wheelhouse.