Liberal Forum

IkeBana » 24 Jun 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 8:12 am

I don't know what you conjobs are sniveling about all the time.  All the witnesses are Republicans.  Seems like your side is being heard just fine.

Those republicans are Trump haters.  It's Trump's side that's not being heard. 

But it's OK cause even the left wing media is now saying no one gives a Bleep about the J6 hearings and the journalist that said that got it from two members of the dem party.   

 

Neo » 24 Jun 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 8:12 am

Hurting liberals feelings isn't a criminal act.....yet. If questioning the results of an election were criminal then AL Gore and the most qualified birthing person to ever run for elective office would have been charged. What crimes were committed? Seems like the democrats case rests on the notion that Trump really didn't believe there was fraud and knew he lost the most secure election ever held in a western democracy. Oddly held under emergency conditions with dozens of states changing their voting rules in the name of rona without input from the state judiciary.

They contend that Trump tried to "change the results of the election" yet, yes, changed the voting rules using CoronaVirus as an excuse to bypass the State Legislatures.    .......This wasn't done by coincidence....
...and then, there is this:
"If questioning the results of an election were criminal then AL Gore and the most qualified birthing person to ever run for elective office would have been charged."  ......It depends on who is questioning the results of an election.......According to the Leftist, Trump hasn't the rights afforded the common citizen....

.....and this:
"What crimes were committed?"
.....Good question...  
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 8:17 am

Had you watched the testimony of Grifty's DoJ appointees, you would have learned how much deference the collective lunacy was granted.

One can only imagine the cost of pursuing this ****.

You wouldn't be waxing this **** stupid had you watched the testimony.

I didn't waste a minute of my life reading Muellers mewlings. Won't waste a minute watching democrats fake made for TV trial. 
 

Neo » 24 Jun 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 9:14 am

I didn't waste a minute of my life reading Muellers mewlings. Won't waste a minute watching democrats fake made for TV trial.

What would the Grifty appointees and staffers who were there know about the facts, eh?

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 9:17 am

What would the Grifty appointees and staffers who were there know about the facts, eh?

Thought this was supposed to be about the cause of a civil disobedience event on Jan 6th? Seems like mission creep to me. 
 

MAGAdreaming » 24 Jun 2022, 12:54 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:54 am

And it's shocking how many republicans like the crimes that Donald trump had committed.

Name one that he's been charged with and found guilty of, Dillbub. But you keep on trying if it makes you feel better.

MAGAdreaming » 24 Jun 2022, 12:54 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:54 am

And it's shocking how many republicans like the crimes that Donald trump had committed.

Naturally you have no evidence as usual.

If yer title were true half the dem party would be in prison.   lol

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am

Did you hear the guys from Grifty's DoJ talking about the garbage youtube videos they were obliged to watch, cause Grifty lost?

Another **** question. Veghead and his safe space.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 7:58 am

These were the guys running Grifty's DoJ, **** imbecile.

For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron." 

• Pic, which I easily cancel out. 
• Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response. 
• Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned. 
• Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one. 
• Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****. 
• Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat. 
• I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted. 

Here is evidence that you are a moron: 

• You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
• You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one. 
• Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
• You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism. 
• You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others. 
• You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.

Vegas » 24 Jun 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 11:52 am

 

Don't you have a rule against repeating yourself?

Neo » 24 Jun 2022, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 9:44 am

Thought this was supposed to be about the cause of a civil disobedience event on Jan 6th? Seems like mission creep to me.

It wouldn't if you had watched the hearings.

But this is pretty much what I predicted.
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 11:58 am

 

For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron." 

• Pic, which I easily cancel out. 
• Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response. 
• Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned. 
• Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one. 
• Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****. 
• Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat. 
• I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted. 

Here is evidence that you are a moron: 

• You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
• You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one. 
• Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
• You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism. 
• You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others. 
• You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am

 

For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron." 

• Pic, which I easily cancel out. 
• Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response. 
• Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned. 
• Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one. 
• Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****. 
• Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat. 
• I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted. 

Here is evidence that you are a moron: 

• You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
• You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one. 
• Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
• You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism. 
• You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others. 
• You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 11:58 am

 

For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron." 

• Pic, which I easily cancel out. 
• Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response. 
• Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned. 
• Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one. 
• Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****. 
• Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat. 
• I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted. 

Here is evidence that you are a moron: 

• You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
• You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one. 
• Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
• You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism. 
• You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others. 
• You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.

Vegas » 24 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

 

 

I completely understand your desperate need to avert your eyes.

**** you've been telling yourself for more than a year is taking a vicious beating.

From which you will continue, as a matter of Principle, to avert your rheumy eyes.

 

You've sort of taken a stand on the question of Grifty's  complicity, and the very nature of the event.

And it always suffered terribly upon scrutiny....now it is being shredded by the evidence. 

Evidence from which you will avert your eyes.

  

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

 

I see you don't like your punishment. Good. Stop violating rule 2, then you wouldn't have to worry about it. 

I assume you don't remember where the rule is posted, right?   

For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron." 

• Pic, which I easily cancel out. 
• Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response. 
• Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned. 
• Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one. 
• Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****. 
• Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat. 
• I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted. 

Here is evidence that you are a moron: 

• You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
• You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one. 
• Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
• You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism. 
• You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others. 
• You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.

↓

↓

Neo » 24 Jun 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 9:14 am

I didn't waste a minute of my life reading Muellers mewlings. Won't waste a minute watching democrats fake made for TV trial. I use my time to listen to Tucker preach about tranny    bathrooms and preach    about the illion dollar economy even though he's as ignorant as I as to the origin and nature of even one dollar. 

...fixed...  
 

peepee » 24 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm

...fixed...

….Yaaawwnnnn….
 

razoo » 24 Jun 2022, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 3:00 pm

WHO IS GOING TO HOLD GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE?  

We need grand jury investigations, indictments and some special prosecutors. I get real nervous when elected officials are investigating their own. I want special hard core prosecutors NOT elected officials prosecuting

Still waiting for a list of crimes. Suspecting fraud and acting on those deeply held convictions isn't criminal. 
 

Neo » 24 Jun 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 3:08 pm

Still waiting for a list of crimes. Suspecting fraud and acting on those deeply held convictions isn't criminal.

razoo wants to live in a society that does not allow contesting the results of any elections.

razoo better be careful what razoo wishes for.