Liberal Forum

Huey » 25 Jun 2022, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 4:39 pm

Looks like  @Blackvegetable   ran away.

Why does it look like that?

Huey » 25 Jun 2022, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 3:46 pm

If you read ALL of my posts on this thread you wouldn’t have to ask.  I knew what it was but I did not know what weapon it was for.

Now answer the question. 

Skans » 25 Jun 2022, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 3:43 pm

If you have a point to make, then make it.  I'm not going to sit here and guess about the point you are miserably attempting to make.

Because both Machine Guns and Assault Rifles are designed to serve specific military purposes, reflecting prevailing battle tactics and realities.

Their legal definitions are irrelevant. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm

Now answer the question.

No need.  Make a point, Google Genius.  Post my first reply.  Or Meltdown, Mary, and **** up another thread you think you need to control.

Huey » 25 Jun 2022, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:30 pm

No need.  Make a point, Google Genius.  Post my first reply.  Or Meltdown, Mary, and **** up another thread you think you need to control.

**** off.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm

Why does it look like that?

because you made numerous posts and ignored replies here.  You are not knowledgeable enough to be in here, son.  TIME STAMPS are a bitch, Capt. ST.
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm

Now answer the question.

Answered before you asked it, Cap ST.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm

**** off.

Won’t happen.  There is absolutely no context where you are man enough to make that happen.

Staplophobia » 25 Jun 2022, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:40 pm

CRETIN
GO **** YOURSELF

   

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm

**** off.

I accept your surrender.  Now stop attempting to control and **** up yet another thread, junior.

Huey » 25 Jun 2022, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:43 pm

I accept your surrender.  Now stop attempting to control and **** up yet another thread, junior.

On what point do you believe you are accepting a surrender, Brave Sir Yappy?

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:55 pm

On what point do you believe you are accepting a surrender, Brave Sir Yappy?

The topic and my posts.  You are not smart enough on this topic.

Huey » 25 Jun 2022, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:07 pm

The topic and my posts.  You are not smart enough on this topic.

That's quite vague, Brave Sir Yappy.

Show me an example. 
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:14 pm

That's quite vague, Brave Sir Yappy.

Show me an example.

Your lack of posts on the topic,
 
 

Skans » 24 Jun 2022, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 9:05 am

That is actually an interesting guess.  Technically, such a device (and there are such devices) would be called an "auto-reset", which would automatically reset the trigger after bumpfiring.  But, no, this has nothing to do with bump stocks.  It is a genuine, registered machine gun.

You don't even need a bumpstock to auto-reset. Just need a belt loop.

Skans » 25 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm

Fair enough, I get that from a practical standpoint.  Especially if you are competing where reloading takes precious time and you are working your way through a course trying to make quick, precise hits without wasting ammo.  Semi-auto, possibly binary, works best for that.  I do think if someone becomes proficient at using a binary type trigger, it could decrease their time going through a course. However, traditional semi-auto guys tend to HATE binary-type triggers, because that's not what they are used to.

Back-strap safeties can be a pain too.
Grab the gun wrong and you have to shift your grip to shoot.

Both have their place and their fans, I guess. Like you said "what they are used to."

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm

Because both Machine Guns and Assault Rifles are designed to serve specific military purposes, reflecting prevailing battle tactics and realities.

Their legal definitions are irrelevant.

Stupid nonsense.  Both, machine guns and semi-auto rifles were designed as killing machines.  For either killing animals or people.  That's what they are for.  "Reflecting prevailing battle tactics and realities" - I've not seen such a freaking stupid phrase which says absolutely nothing since I last watched Biden speak at a press conference.
 

DeezerShoove » 25 Jun 2022, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:48 pm

You don't even need a bumpstock to auto-reset. Just need a belt loop.

Just gotta ask you - how do you get your aiming eye down by your belt loop?
 

DeezerShoove » 25 Jun 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 7:00 pm

Back-strap safeties can be a pain too.

You're 100% right about that.  But, try and tell this to a diehard 1911 fanboy, and you will get a bunch of smack thrown back at you about how it makes it a better gun.  ****!  Backstrap safeties were added at the request of some retarded army general.  1911's weren't originally designed with this.  And, after they give you 10 paragraphs on the benefits of backstrap safeties, just ask them why they were never used in Browning Hi-Powers.

Then, when you get done shoving the stupid, back-strap safeties (which can be removed, and replaced with a stationary insert, by the way) go tell a Glock Fanboy to shove that stupid trigger dingus up his ***!  I HATE GUNS WITH A TRIGGER DINGUS!!!  I'd much prefer DA/SA or a good old fashioned lever safety to that stupid trigger dingus.

Yes, there is someone who makes a lever safety for Glocks.  And, yes, you can remove the dingus. Not worth the trouble or the legal hassles.

Rant over - I need a fist full of blood pressure meds after that!!!!!!!
 
 

Skans » 25 Jun 2022, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 8:35 pm

You're 100% right about that.  But, try and tell this to a diehard 1911 fanboy, and you will get a bunch of smack thrown back at you about how it makes it a better gun.  ****!  Backstrap safeties were added at the request of some retarded army general.  1911's weren't originally designed with this.  And, after they give you 10 paragraphs on the benefits of backstrap safeties, just ask them why they were never used in Browning Hi-Powers.

Then, when you get done shoving the stupid, back-strap safeties (which can be removed, and replaced with a stationary insert, by the way) go tell a Glock Fanboy to shove that stupid trigger dingus up his ***!  I HATE GUNS WITH A TRIGGER DINGUS!!!  I'd much prefer DA/SA or a good old fashioned lever safety to that stupid trigger dingus.

Yes, there is someone who makes a lever safety for Glocks.  And, yes, you can remove the dingus. Not worth the trouble or the legal hassles.

Rant over - I need a fist full of blood pressure meds after that!!!!!!!

Legal hassles over modifying your own safety?
You mean if there's an accident or something, right?

btw
A good rant isn't so bad...