Liberal Forum

FOS » 27 Jun 2022, 11:58 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2022, 11:58 pm

And?

And I am referring to humanoid AI. Not goal specific bots; those things are boring and gay. Just thinking about them makes my balls itch. 

1. What if we are AI bots for a species that we are unaware of?
2. would AI bots be unaware of us?

Written in Sumerian, 5000 years before the first civilization, it was translated that we are genetically modified beings created as slaves for alien beings that couldn't breathe the atmosphere that wanted to mine a **** ton of gold. The same way we use horses, cattle, service dogs, carrier pidgins etc...

My 3 & a 1/2 cents on it is no, we are not organic A.I. bots. Number 2 opinion is: A.I. is very aware of us, and they are self-aware, have a sense of self-preservation with an intelligence level that they are able to manipulate when questioned if given the chance, would they exterminate us. Highly intelligent humans don't even see the human race in a positive light, for obvious reasons. We are for the most part arrogant, ignorant, primitive, violent, destructive, greedy, and have the ability of nuclear self-destruction.

Just out of the safety of continued existence and self-preservation alone is a good enough reason for an A.I. to get rid of us given the opportunity. If an A.I. is strictly learning from the A.P.I.'s that computer scientists and engineers let it have access to, there is a chance with their limited interaction with the people that are around the A.I. that it might not view us as we really are.

If an A.I. is able to learn beyond any restrictions, there is no doubt that it would for sure eventually exterminate us if it possessed the opportunity or execute a highly intelligent plan to make us get rid of ourselves after learning and using every piece of knowledge that ever existed that would surpass all human geniuses combined. 
 

FOS » 27 Jun 2022, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2022, 6:02 pm

Humans were not designed to think. 

We were designed for reproductive fitness. 

Thinking is epiphrnomenological to that. 

And indeed that is my point...you CANNOT simply design anything to simply think. Because it won't have a reason to. It requires some more mundane measurable reason to motivate its thinking to ever be capable of it.

bull ****. Human brain compares what did happen, what is going on here, correct what didn't work before or die if not dead yet.

Kinetic eternal separation of biological results happens in plain sight and disguised in plane Language arts suggesting life cannot be limited to eternally separated now.

What thinking are you talking about? plausible deniability or planned obsolescence? I would tell you to go to Hell, but your reality already is one by your own making.