LOOK AWAY! LOOK AWAY!
one1zer0 » 27 Jun 2022, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Being wilfully ignorant is a defence mechanism and is built on the deliberate avoidance of evidence that doesn’t match one’s existing beliefs. You keep bringing this up and accusing other people that you have classified as your political enemies so to speak. Can you give me examples of this? Like for instance this can be demonstrated in the accusation that "Trump is a Russian asset" that has been proved to be a hoax, and a wilfully ignorant person wouldn't find out the reason why and keep on insisting that it is fact. Another example is "Good people on both sides" was deliberately taken out of context. What is an example of when this has happened to make you keep stating that your political opposition is wilfully ignorant?
...."They live in an alternate reality devoid of fact and where truths are supplanted by whatever **** their leaders feed them, 24/7 via Fux news and other vendors of hate"
Where are the **** and hate examples of Fox News? What stories have they run that demonstrates they hate and lie?
that's a lot of verbiage to arrive at this bit of stupid.that has been proved to be a hoax,
"THE ELECTION WAS 'STOLEN'"one1zer0 » 27 Jun 2022, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑
Being wilfully ignorant is a defence mechanism and is built on the deliberate avoidance of evidence that doesn’t match one’s existing beliefs. You keep bringing this up and accusing other people that you have classified as your political enemies so to speak. Can you give me examples of this?
B.See » 27 Jun 2022, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ They're mean spirited, brain dead, and brainwashed. They live in an alternate reality devoid of fact and where truths are supplanted by whatever **** their leaders feed them, 24/7 via Fux news and other vendors of hate.
That's why trying to engage them will always prove to be a waste of time, though one cannot help but occasionally going at 'em for their sheer and often WILLFUL ignorance.
What will you do when REALITY slaps you in the face like a dead mackeral? I don't want to be around when your head explodes! It will be very messy!roadkill » 28 Jun 2022, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ Yer trolling B.See. But it's OK cause you can't be banned here.

nuckinfutz » 28 Jun 2022, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ What will you do when REALITY slaps you in the face like a dead mackeral? I don't want to be around when your head explodes! It will be very messy!
You are too skeered to watch the J6 hearings!![]()
Sounds like politicians and politicsB.See » 27 Jun 2022, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ They're mean spirited, brain dead, and brainwashed. They live in an alternate reality devoid of fact and where truths are supplanted by whatever **** their leaders feed them, 24/7 via Fux news and other vendors of hate.
That's why trying to engage them will always prove to be a waste of time, though one cannot help but occasionally going at 'em for their sheer and often WILLFUL ignorance.
Yuri Shvets in 1994 after publishing a book describing his exploits and ultimate falling out with the KGB, Shvets was banned from foreign travel. Why didn't he mention this connection in his other earlier book?Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2022, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑
that's a lot of verbiage to arrive at this bit of stupid.
Senate report details security risk posed by 2016 Trump campaign’s Russia contacts
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... story.html
‘The perfect target’: Russia cultivated Trump as asset for 40 years – ex-KGB spy
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... y-new-book
one1zer0 » 28 Jun 2022, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Yuri Shvets in 1994 after publishing a book describing his exploits and ultimate falling out with the KGB, Shvets was banned from foreign travel. Why didn't he mention this connection in his other earlier book?
Yuri Shvets job was as a correspondent for the Russian state news agency Tass was trained in Provocation and disinformation:
The Russians have a word: Provokatsiya, in English, Provocation. Definition: “A political event staged by an intelligence service on behalf of its government in order to accomplish some political goal.” The communist special services arrange a horrifying event, which is subsequently blamed on anti-communists. There is another Russian word, as well: Dezinformatsiya [or disinformation]. It refers to misleading information planted by the Russian special services. In many instances, the Russians or their communist friends will benefit.
It's funny how leftists want to believe an X-K.G.B. agent and then turn around and say everything is Russian disinformation.
Trump's corporation bought 200 TVs about 40 years ago from Soviet immigrant Semyon Kislin, co-owner of Joy-Lud electronics on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. Semyon Kislin, that Yuri Shvets claims is the connection to Trump. There is no record of Semyon Kislin as co-owner of this business, T.Sapir was the C.E.O. I went to look at the Source Record for more information and got "This application is currently offline for maintenance". The information was from the New York Department of State. Data last refreshed on Sunday, June 19, 2022
Trump would have had to personally went down to the electronics store He got someone else to order the 200 TVs and a co-owner that there is no record of ownership, is the connection? [Also, Mr.Kislin denies having any connection to the KGB]. No paper trail, just claims by some guy writing a book that never mentions the connection until now.
Sounds a lot like “The Steele dossier,” a pile of **** compiled by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele. You want to believe that even though Trump has been under investigation for 6 years that this wouldn't have come up? 2 years of Russian collusion lies, but in your mind this time is the real Russian spy scenario.
I don't know why you are posting a link to "Senate report details security risk posed by 2016 Trump campaign’s Russia contacts" when it is widely known to be a nothing burger with a side of nothing fries.
I don't understand why leftists keep falling for these absurd allegations that are made by corrupt political pieces of ****. I won't even get into the bias sources you used.
Some of it is from your link doorknob, some of it is from the New York Department of State records. Some of it is from searching for information on Yuri Shvets. Instead of just blindly accepting what the "News" wants you to think, they've been caught too many times lying to manipulate people, so you believe absurd **** like Trump is a Russian super spy because of a political agenda to smear him, why don't you learn how to do your own research?
one1zer0 » 28 Jun 2022, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Some of it is from your link doorknob, some of it is from the New York State department's records. Some of it is from searching for information on Yuri Shvets. Instead of just blindly accepting what the "News" wants you to think, they've been caught too many times lying to manipulate people, so you believe absurd **** like Trump is a Russian super spy because of a political agenda to smear him, why don't you learn how to do your own research?
WTF gave you THAT idea?so you believe absurd **** like Trump is a Russian super spy
In a phone interview today, Kislin downplayed his relationships with Trump and Giuliani. He denied saying he was the president’s adviser, though it’s reflected in embassy documents. He also described himself as Trump’s adviser in a 2018 interview with a Ukrainian journalist.one1zer0 » 28 Jun 2022, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Some of it is from your link doorknob, some of it is from the New York Department of State records. Some of it is from searching for information on Yuri Shvets. Instead of just blindly accepting what the "News" wants you to think, they've been caught too many times lying to manipulate people, so you believe absurd **** like Trump is a Russian super spy because of a political agenda to smear him, why don't you learn how to do your own research?
So what does any of this prove? Kislin donated to Democrats, are they Russian assets as well? lolz What is your point?Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2022, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ In a phone interview today, Kislin downplayed his relationships with Trump and Giuliani. He denied saying he was the president’s adviser, though it’s reflected in embassy documents. He also described himself as Trump’s adviser in a 2018 interview with a Ukrainian journalist.
https://revealnews.org/article/russian- ... t-inquiry/
What evidence do you have to say it wasn't stolen, as Democrats blocked any attempts at any investigations into seeing if it was a fair election. Just declaring that it was the most secure election in history doesn't cut it.
His "advisor", braindead piece of ****?one1zer0 » 28 Jun 2022, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ So what does any of this prove? Kislin donated to Democrats, are they Russian assets as well? lolz What is your point?
What evidence do you have that democrats did anything of the sort?one1zer0 » 29 Jun 2022, 3:31 am » wrote: ↑ What evidence do you have to say it wasn't stolen, as Democrats blocked any attempts at any investigations into seeing if it was a fair election. Just declaring that it was the most secure election in history doesn't cut it.
Okay, so if it is actually true, and they do get Trump this time, I can admit that I was wrong and just a brainwashed idiot. If they don't "get" Trump, well, I guess we all know what we already knew about leftists. lolz! Let's wait and see. I'm going to have so much fun rubbing it in your face. haha!Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑ His "advisor", braindead piece of ****?
It also proves your "research" was for ****.
They didn't want any investigations being done. The news media that is a leftist propaganda machine said "It was the most secure election in history" Anyone who questioned anything to do with the election being stolen was brushed off as a conspiracy theorist, big tech. banned anyone that even mentioned it as a possibility, etc...Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ What evidence do you have that democrats did anything of the sort?
hahaha his "advisor" if you actually took the time to read the article instead of thinking the news media doesn't lie then you'd know that that old ugly man claimed he was his "informal advisor" he could have claimed Trump was his gay lover it doesn't prove anything.Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2022, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑ His "advisor", braindead piece of ****?
It also proves your "research" was for ****.

There were numerous audits in various states.one1zer0 » 29 Jun 2022, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ They didn't want any investigations being done. The news media that is a leftist propaganda machine said "It was the most secure election in history" Anyone who questioned anything to do with the election being stolen was brushed off as a conspiracy theorist, big tech. banned anyone that even mentioned it as a possibility, etc...
Countless leftist politicians claiming it was an absurd idea. Why didn't they just investigate? They loooooove investigations. Well except if it will show how corrupt they are, then it's all just conspiracy. If you want to take their word for it and think Joe Biden got the most votes in history, that's a you problem. lolz Maybe Joe Biden did and he is a way better president than Obama, it's just too bad Obama was holding back Joe Biden all those years. lolz