Liberal Forum

ConsRule » 01 Jul 2022, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 12:28 pm

Xavier_Onassis » 01 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm

You have a faulty memory.
Trump asked the RUSSIANS to investigate Hillary's e-mails.
He was accused, rightfully of both being silly and treasonous. No heads came close to exploding.
There was nothing useful to anyone in Hillary's e mails

Your memory is faulty...and it goes well with your incomparable stupidity.

Ever hear of Ukraine?

Well...XO is actually wrong about treason.  When Trump encouraged the Russians to hack Clinton's email accounts he wasn't committing "treason".  A treasonous act can only be committed during war time, and we weren't at war with Russia at the time. 

But when Trump encouraged the Russians to hack Clinton's emails which would get him information that would benefit his campaign, he violated the Federal Campaign Finance Law that prohibits any person from "solicitation of anything of value given to influence an election, from a foreign national, including a foreign government."  That is a felony.

Side note...
The last presidential candidate to commit treason was Richard Nixon, late in the 1968 presidential election campaign when, during the Vietnam War, he contacted the government of South Vietnam in what turned out to be a successful attempt to interfere in the Paris peace talks.  It's why Ford pardoned Nixon.  Nixon should have been shot or hanged.
 
 
 

Jantje_Smit » 01 Jul 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 10:06 am

I don't think Rich posts here so your outrage is pointless....

I don't think George Armstrong Custer posts here, so your constant referencing to him is what is pointless.  On the other hand...

Rich Lowery, in addition to being an asshole trumper seditionist, is the Editorr-In-Chief of the ultra-conservative National Review, and thus always a legitimate reference in this **** forum.  Which is why your objection to the OP is what is pointless, you stoopid **** polack.
 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 01 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm

You have a faulty memory.
Trump asked the RUSSIANS to investigate Hillary's e-mails.
He was accused, rightfully of both being silly and treasonous. No heads came close to exploding.
There was nothing useful to anyone in Hillary's e mails

That makes sense...Hillary destroyed her emails after being subpoenaed because there was nothing useful in them.

And you use to teach?      

IkeBana » 02 Jul 2022, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2022, 6:20 am

I don't think George Armstrong Custer posts here, so your constant referencing to him is what is pointless.  On the other hand...

Rich Lowery, in addition to being an asshole trumper seditionist, is the Editorr-In-Chief of the ultra-conservative National Review, and thus always a legitimate reference in this **** forum.  Which is why your objection to the OP is what is pointless, you stoopid **** polack.

I have no objection to the OP, I only thought to point out that it is kind of silly to 'argue' with someone who doesn't post here.... and it obviously isn't pointless, it triggered you, which was the intention...

Oh, and you're wrong, the general posts here... in a way...



 
 
 

IkeBana » 01 Jul 2022, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 9:11 am

Don't Indict Trump

Really Rich?  Thats it?  That's your argument?You right wingjob ****.  We already know the country is half full of assholes.  If you have an actual argument Rich, provide it.

You "got Trump now" everyday don't you.  It's all part of the Progressive Idiocracy's Brain Trust plan to make you idiocrats think you "got him now" when Trump's actually grabbed you by your "man in a dress" ******.

roadkill » 02 Jul 2022, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2022, 6:43 am

That makes sense...Hillary destroyed her emails after being subpoenaed because there was nothing useful in them.


 

FAUXNEWS talking points.  Whatever Clinton did with her emails, the FBI had already said there was nothing there.
 

IkeBana » 03 Jul 2022, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 7:56 am

FAUXNEWS talking points.  Whatever Clinton did with her emails, the FBI had already said there was nothing there.

No they didn't Gomer. 

How could the FBI say that if Hillary destroyed her emails dum dum?

Always check with me before posting.   lol

Jantje_Smit » 02 Jul 2022, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2022, 6:48 am

I have no objection to the OP, I only thought to point out that it is kind of silly to 'argue' with someone who doesn't post here.... and it obviously isn't pointless, it triggered you, which was the intention...

Oh, and you're wrong, the general posts here... in a way...

 

WTF are you back at the crack pipe again?  The majority of posts made here are about people who have never posted here.  Has Donald Trump ever posted here?  Has Joe Biden?  Your complaint is pointless.  You're a chronic pointless complainer.

So now you're channeling Custer, eh?  I didn't think you **** conjobs go in for all that stuff.
 

nefarious101 » 02 Jul 2022, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2022, 6:56 am

You "got Trump now" everyday don't you.  It's all part of the Progressive Idiocracy's Brain Trust plan to make you idiocrats think you "got him now" when Trump's actually grabbed you by your "man in a dress" ******.

Trump is a sociopathic grifter.  Even former members of his own legal team think criminal indictments are inevitable.  For crimes in his business activities as well as his crimes in office.  And the orange **** is coming more unhinged day by day down in Florida.  Of course they will never get him.  All his servicing of Putin's pecker was designed in advance to get him lifetime asylum in Russia.  Reckon how Donald is going to like being stuck in a condo down the hall from Snowden's place.   
 

IkeBana » 03 Jul 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 8:10 am

Trump is a sociopathic grifter.  Even former members of his own legal team think criminal indictments are inevitable.  For crimes in his business activities as well as his crimes in office.  And the orange **** is coming more unhinged day by day down in Florida.  Of course they will never get him.  All his servicing of Putin's pecker was designed in advance to get him lifetime asylum in Russia.  Reckon how Donald is going to like being stuck in a condo down the hall from Snowden's place.

We've heard all your "we got him now" stories....none of which have a bit of truth about Trump....and yet you can't seems to move on can you?

You lost all credibility with the Russia Russia Russia ****....you're done now.....only others like yourself who can't stop their trump obsessions will believe anything you say....and those are getting fewer and fewer in numbers as reality tears your argument to shreds
 

IkeBana » 03 Jul 2022, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jul 2022, 7:59 am

WTF are you back at the crack pipe again?  The majority of posts made here are about people who have never posted here.  Has Donald Trump ever posted here?  Has Joe Biden?  Your complaint is pointless.  You're a chronic pointless complainer.

So now you're channeling Custer, eh?  I didn't think you **** conjobs go in for all that stuff.

You sound grumpy again this morning... maybe you missed it but you're the one that has been chronically whining about your TDS... I do channel the general from time to time but I can also channel some BV.... post the thread title.....

 


 
 

IkeBana » 01 Jul 2022, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2022, 9:11 am

If you believe that an indictment of the most likely candidate to run against Joe Biden in 2024 by the president’s own Justice Department would be considered anything but a politicized travesty by about half of the country, you haven’t been paying attention.

Don't Indict Trump

Really Rich?  Thats it?  That's your argument?You right wingjob ****.  We already know the country is half full of assholes.  If you have an actual argument Rich, provide it.

On what charges would you like to see him indicted?