FOS » 04 Jul 2022, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Historically, pedophiles and child murderers were typically involved in some ritual to summon demons.
And I dunno man. Maybe they did summon demons.
You just have to ask yourself...why the **** would modern power be trying to normalize a practice that confers no objective benefit from a power or economic perspective?
We should bring back public executions.SJConspirator » 04 Jul 2022, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I am attracted to physically and (somewhat) emotionally mature women. This is a healthy sex drive, because these women can have reciprocal desire and enjoyment.
For a child to be subjected to a sex act is a traumatizing experience. It damages them and corrupts them, and THAT is the essence of pedo attraction, the sadistic factor
Pedos are not attracted to smaller frames and lack of secondary sex characteristics, they are excited by the prospect of causing long lasting irreparable harm
Pedos are evil saevils who use sex as their weapon to destroy innocent and vulnerable children. They should be executed for the safety of the community, like serial killers are executed
I think they just people who get off on harm and domination but need to pick targets that are helpless and easy to snatch and easy to dispose of.FOS » 04 Jul 2022, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Historically, pedophiles and child murderers were typically involved in some ritual to summon demons.
And I dunno man. Maybe they did summon demons.
You just have to ask yourself...why the **** would modern power be trying to normalize a practice that confers no objective benefit from a power or economic perspective?
Don't know there will be much reigning in Hell. The guy that manages the place is known to be a bit of a sadistic asshole and a diva.SJConspirator » 04 Jul 2022, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ cuz they would rather reign over hell than serve in heaven
Neo » 04 Jul 2022, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't know there will be much reigning in Hell. The guy that manages the place is known to be a bit of a sadistic asshole and a diva.
Progressive Hollywood's goal is less procreation, to encourage and normalize non reproductive aberrant behavior. Not sure where sexualization of children fits in their agenda. It obviously does but I can't figure out the angle.Cannonpointer » 04 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Hollywood sexulizes children and deliberately conditions men against their nature.
To a natural man, a woman who has borne children is sexier than a girl who has not. To a Hollywood entrained man, women are not attractive - only girls are attractive.
I agree with most of this. Its about control. However, I also think there should be a safe haven laws where men can turn themselves in instead of actually attacking children. Some of the most helpful folks are reformed pedofiles.SJConspirator » 04 Jul 2022, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I am attracted to physically and (somewhat) emotionally mature women. This is a healthy sex drive, because these women can have reciprocal desire and enjoyment.
For a child to be subjected to a sex act is a traumatizing experience. It damages them and corrupts them, and THAT is the essence of pedo attraction, the sadistic factor
Pedos are not attracted to smaller frames and lack of secondary sex characteristics, they are excited by the prospect of causing long lasting irreparable harm
Pedos are evil saevils who use sex as their weapon to destroy innocent and vulnerable children. They should be executed for the safety of the community, like serial killers are executed
****.ScottMon » 04 Jul 2022, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree with most of this. Its about control. However, I also think there should be a safe haven laws where men can turn themselves in instead of actually attacking children. Some of the most helpful folks are reformed pedofiles.
A reformed paedophile's plea on behalf of children | | The Guardian
If can stop them before they hurt someone, That's a win for everyone.FOS » 04 Jul 2022, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ ****.
This is Sort-of a 101 of liberal ****. Yr just too weak to punish people.. which fails to deter them.
ScottMon » 04 Jul 2022, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree with most of this. Its about control. However, I also think there should be a safe haven laws where men can turn themselves in instead of actually attacking children. Some of the most helpful folks are reformed pedofiles.
A reformed paedophile's plea on behalf of children | | The Guardian
Neo » 04 Jul 2022, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Progressive Hollywood's goal is less procreation, to encourage and normalize non reproductive aberrant behavior. Not sure where sexualization of children fits in their agenda. It obviously does but I can't figure out the angle.
[[[HOLLYWOOD]]] can use pedophilia as a way to demonize White Christians.Neo » 04 Jul 2022, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Progressive Hollywood's goal is less procreation, to encourage and normalize non reproductive aberrant behavior. Not sure where sexualization of children fits in their agenda. It obviously does but I can't figure out the angle.
Well, That's fascist of you.SJConspirator » 04 Jul 2022, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ If you have a urge to rape children rather than protect them, you are not fit to live imo
now in times past, girls would get married after the first period, sometimes 13 or 14 years old. Human lifespan was shorter then too. So I am not talking about liking young women who are sexually developed, there is a fine line. Hips and tits and *** are hot, when hormonally nurtured
but if you see a toddler and get a boner, your a sick **** who needs to die
Last I checked, the Catholic church was pretty right wing.Neo » 04 Jul 2022, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Progressive Hollywood's goal is less procreation, to encourage and normalize non reproductive aberrant behavior. Not sure where sexualization of children fits in their agenda. It obviously does but I can't figure out the angle.
ScottMon » 04 Jul 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ If can stop them before they hurt someone, That's a win for everyone.
a good amount of Boomers had Grand Mas who were legit Teen Brides. Back when average life expectancy was in the 40 to 50 year range and young women were seen as a burden by her parents....no wonder adult life began early back then...it had to.SJConspirator » 04 Jul 2022, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ If you have a urge to rape children rather than protect them, you are not fit to live imo
now in times past, girls would get married after the first period, sometimes 13 or 14 years old. Human lifespan was shorter then too. So I am not talking about liking young women who are sexually developed, there is a fine line. Hips and tits and *** are hot, when hormonally nurtured
but if you see a toddler and get a boner, your a sick **** who needs to die