Liberal Forum

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores. 

 
 

MessiahDuPont » 10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores.

Unrealistic crap.

DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm

Unrealistic crap.

I bet this proposal would stop hundreds of children from getting murdered every year.  
 

Messiah DuPont » 10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores. 

 
 

all you do is guess what else life should have been, so how the hell you ever going to be sure of anything when you won't accept natural physical absolutes.

MessiahDuPont » 10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores.

Another Gun Grabber telling lies....so what's new about that?


yeah yeah yeah....you're full of ****....period!!


"The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose."

--James Earl Jones

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm

I bet this proposal would stop hundreds of children from getting murdered every year.

Kill all males... That would do it.

Deezer Shoove » 10 Jul 2022, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 8:26 pm

Kill all males... That would do it.

Vasectomies and time in jail until sperm count hits zero per ejaculation when a male doesn't support his verified children.Instead of transgenders any male at age 16 says he never wants to be a father, vasectomy given as their request without parental consent same as a girl getting birth control or abortion.
Fair is fair.

Really only two genders keeping the population changing forward now as it has since inception. OOps I did it again. imploded every reality in this atmosphere..

Bet most will say I was off topic to the thread title, human right to bear arms or demand society pay for other people's ancestors when most struggle to provide for their own. Society stands against personal responsibility to serve the greater good intentions of those promising better tomorrows when life doesn't exceed mutually evolving now.

amazing how elections are won by deniers, liars, embezzlers, enablers over the honest soles that have to pay to belong in a social order of pretending biological results aren't eternally separated here in plain sight.

Rule of law now calls honest instinctive awareness hate speech, mentally ill, anti social behavior, discrimination against a person's legal character to perform as socially directed cradle to grave by predetermined laws suggesting life cannot exist without reality.

DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm

Unrealistic crap.

Can you be more specific?

Are ammosexuals too stupid to be regulated?
 

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm

I bet this proposal would stop hundreds of children from getting murdered every year.

Laws only impact the law abiding. 
 

DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2022, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 8:26 pm

Kill all males... That would do it.

What's a male?   
 

DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm

Unrealistic crap.

Marxist CRAP!!!
 

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 5:19 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:19 am

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm

I bet this proposal would stop hundreds of children from getting murdered every year.

Laws only impact the law abiding. 
 

That is supposed to be eternal wisdom? That is glotting.

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:21 am

DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2022, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 8:26 pm

Kill all males... That would do it.

What's a male?  :rofl:  
 

the gender producing sperm that fertilizes a female egg and that results added another male or female to the populaiton forward never same ancestor twice inception to extinction.

rule of 72 applies to compounding DNA same as it does on interest yields for taxes, loans, and investments.

You really should study the compounding rate of tax on every use of currency used each time sustaining a social economy. 6% sales tax alone devalues the dollar spent 16.25 times. add all the other taxes onto that.

You will find out "government" embezzles ancestors' time cradle to grave with life only limited to evolving at the same time living here now. Back to compounding DNA separation of generation gaps between 16 great great grandparents and each arriving great great grandchild.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 5:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:17 am

DeezerShoove » 10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm

Unrealistic crap.

Can you be more specific?

Are ammosexuals too stupid to be regulated?
 

 

States like Illinois already have state and federal background checks.  How's that working out for you?  But I forgot, you know everything about guns.  According to you I know very little.   

Revolutionary » wrote:

24 Jan 1970, 7:51 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores. 

 
 

 

1.  25 is too old.  I would support 21.  Which is the federal age for handguns.

2.  I would not limit the amount of gun stores allowed to open.  As far as training the owner, and those working there, are trained.  The owner, and most employees, are FFLs.

3.  As I stated most states with UBCs do a state and federal check.  States like Illinois  do.  Not working out so well in Chicago. When buying a firearm from a "gun store" all transfers of ownership go thru an FFL who is required by to law to do these background checks. 

4.  The fed gubbermint does not need to know what I am buying.

5.  Online sales of firearms are delivered to an FFL (Not to your hose) who does a a background check.  
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 5:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:17 am

Can you be more specific?

Are ammosexuals too stupid to be regulated?

When a simple **** (like you) is flat out against something (like a constitutional right)
there is no reason to discuss anything.

Have yet another awkward day.  

DeezerShoove » 11 Jul 2022, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:49 am

When a simple **** (like you) is flat out against something (like a constitutional right)
there is no reason to discuss anything.

Have yet another awkward day.

sounds a lot like...


Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am

1.  25 is too old.  I would support 21.  Which is the federal age for handguns.

2.  I would not limit the amount of gun stores allowed to open.  As far as training the owner, and those working there, are trained.  The owner, and most employees, are FFLs.

3.  As I stated most states with UBCs do a state and federal check.  States like Illinois  do.  Not working out so well in Chicago. When buying a firearm from a "gun store" all transfers of ownership go thru an FFL who is required by to law to do these background checks. 

4.  The fed gubbermint does not need to know what I am buying.

5.  Online sales of firearms are delivered to an FFL (Not to your hose) who does a a background check.

Do you not register your car?

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am

Do you not register your car?

Is there a constitutional right to a car? 

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 7:00 pm

I bet this proposal would stop hundreds of children from getting murdered every year.

Totally absurd guesswork.

If you truly believe that, then you should be able to provide the list of at least a few dozen children who were intentionally murdered with a legal gun last year.
You can't? 

Oh, then it must be that you believe that CRIMINALS who have a gun in their position will suddenly stop killing people in their drug deals or in the random shootings by a demented or insane maniac, SIMPLY BY CHANGING THE LAW, right?

Are you really that gullible?
 

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:03 am

Is there a constitutional right to a car?

Is the right in question an individual, or collective, right?