Liberal Forum

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:40 am

States like Illinois already have state and federal background checks.  How's that working out for you?  But I forgot, you know everything about guns.  According to you I know very little.

I think I've demonstrated it, actually. 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:59 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am

1.  25 is too old.  I would support 21.  Which is the federal age for handguns.

2.  I would not limit the amount of gun stores allowed to open.  As far as training the owner, and those working there, are trained.  The owner, and most employees, are FFLs.

3.  As I stated most states with UBCs do a state and federal check.  States like Illinois  do.  Not working out so well in Chicago. When buying a firearm from a "gun store" all transfers of ownership go thru an FFL who is required by to law to do these background checks. 

4.  The fed gubbermint does not need to know what I am buying.

5.  Online sales of firearms are delivered to an FFL (Not to your hose) who does a a background check.

Do you not register your car?

 

Why are you asking me?  You think I am an idiot.

But something tells me that is a state law, not federal.  A superior intellect such as you claim to have should not only know that but also understand the difference. Plus, there is no "right" to own a car. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am

I think I've demonstrated it, actually.

LMAO!  

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:05 am

Is the right in question an individual, or collective, right?

Individual. 

RevolutionaryKing » 10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm

I support the second amendment, and I was once even part of the NRA, but after a series of recent mass shootings, I'm starting to question my stance. I think maybe its time limit access to guns: My proposal -

-Limit guns to people over 25.

-Limit the number of gun stores allowed to open per year.--
Require an x amount of hours of training.

 -A person must go through two background checks, A federal and state check. 

- Ammunition can only be purchased through government providers.

- Cease all operations of online gun stores.

aka:  Government controlled socialism.

Gee...why didn't I think of that.    

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am

1.  25 is too old.  I would support 21.  Which is the federal age for handguns.

2.  I would not limit the amount of gun stores allowed to open.  As far as training the owner, and those working there, are trained.  The owner, and most employees, are FFLs.

3.  As I stated most states with UBCs do a state and federal check.  States like Illinois  do.  Not working out so well in Chicago. When buying a firearm from a "gun store" all transfers of ownership go thru an FFL who is required by to law to do these background checks. 

4.  The fed gubbermint does not need to know what I am buying.

5.  Online sales of firearms are delivered to an FFL (Not to your hose) who does a a background check.  
 

How old does a person have to be to learn basic right from wrong? not using morality, legality, ethics to change the basic understanding of life limited to mutually evolving forward now as genetics changes population with each added ancestor forward here?

eliminate which, what, where, when ideology created to lead a geographical area's residents living as eternally separated in biological order past, current, future until great great grandchildren aren't arriving anymore here in this atmosphere from understanding life hangs in the balance of everyone adapting to the moment equally occupying space since conceived.

who, how, why is self evident.

7 degrees of ancestral separation by the numbers present. Biology is the subject, genetics is the answer, simple compounding DNA the specific results.

Arm your brain with awareness every reality is absolutely corrupted. Know how to correct human error without extinction being the solution.

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:10 am

Individual.

The Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud,' on the American public," former chief justice Warren E. Burger said in a 1991 interview on PBS's "MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour." Burger has said often that the "right to bear arms" belongs to the states, and he has attacked the NRA for fostering the opposite view.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/n ... 051095.htm

https://youtu.be/Eya_k4P-iEo
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:19 am

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:10 am

Individual.

The Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud,' on the American public," former chief justice Warren E. Burger said in a 1991 interview on PBS's "MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour." Burger has said often that the "right to bear arms" belongs to the states, and he has attacked the NRA for fostering the opposite view.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/n ... 051095.htm

https://youtu.be/Eya_k4P-iEo
 

 

So?  If it was supposed to belong to the states the framers would not have made it a right.  At the time anything not covered in the constitution did belong to the states.

 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:26 am

So?  If it was supposed to belong to the states the framers would not have made it a right.  At the time anything not covered in the constitution did belong to the states.

And the second amendment inconveniently is named as a national constitutional right.    
 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:26 am

So?  If it was supposed to belong to the states the framers would not have made it a right.  At the time anything not covered in the constitution did belong to the states.

Dumbest **** Alive, and celebrated illiterate coward, challenges a Chief Justice.....with incoherent babble.

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:37 am

And the second amendment inconveniently is named as a national constitutional right.  

You people are complete **** morons.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:09 am

LMAO!

QED.
 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am

Why are you asking me?  You think I am an idiot.

But something tells me that is a state law, not federal.  A superior intellect such as you claim to have should not only know that but also understand the difference. Plus, there is no "right" to own a car.

Yap, yap.

It's about whether or not the gubmint knows about it, **** brick.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:49 am

You people are complete **** morons.

Your personality is absolutely corrupted and you knew it all the time. How stupid is that believing nobody is honest enough to expose every reality is as corrupted as you became after birth.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:48 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:26 am

So?  If it was supposed to belong to the states the framers would not have made it a right.  At the time anything not covered in the constitution did belong to the states.

Dumbest **** Alive, and celebrated illiterate coward, challenges a Chief Justice.....with incoherent babble.

 

So? 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:51 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am

Why are you asking me?  You think I am an idiot.

But something tells me that is a state law, not federal.  A superior intellect such as you claim to have should not only know that but also understand the difference. Plus, there is no "right" to own a car.

Yap, yap.

It's about whether or not the gubmint knows about it, **** brick.

 

Right now federal law says no.  But what would I know, you think I am an illiterate coward and a **** brick.  

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:56 am

Right now federal law says no.  But what would I know, you think I am an illiterate coward and a **** brick.  

Eggplant is a stereotyped personality type casting you by how he was trained to make everyone feel inferior to power of suggestion and his superiority only comes from group think validation life has to be more than genetics delivered so far.

thing is instinctive brain and intellectual mind are natural enemies to the survival of the sole time one has being alive now. His character wants to raise hell, I gave it back in real time each gets being eternally separated now as genetically occupying space here.

his insanity will boil over, sooner than later.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:56 am

Right now federal law says no.  But what would I know, you think I am an illiterate coward and a **** brick.

It's not about federal law either.

It's about your Reflexive Stupid.

Why whine at me...it ain't my fault.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:54 am

So?

Exactly.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:08 am

It's not about federal law either.

It's about your Reflexive Stupid.

Why whine at me...it ain't my fault.

if you aren't correcting the problem, what is left is enabling or creating issues that will always be ongoing until corrections are completed or extinction arrives before.