Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:08 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:56 am

Right now federal law says no.  But what would I know, you think I am an illiterate coward and a **** brick.

It's not about federal law either.

It's about your Reflexive Stupid.

Why whine at me...it ain't my fault.

 

Well, far be it for me to be in such a highfalutin discussion but we are discussing the 2nd Amendment.  Which is telling us what government can or cannot do. 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:16 am

Well, far be it for me to be in such a highfalutin discussion but we are discussing the 2nd Amendment.  Which is telling us what government can or cannot do.

And Chief Justice Burger explained that.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:16 am

Well, far be it for me to be in such a highfalutin discussion but we are discussing the 2nd Amendment.  Which is telling us what government can or cannot do. 

Suggests, because there is a whole lot of governing going on beyond what the Constitution is said to allow. fed, state, personal constitutions about being honest within oneself.

so many adopt a scripted social definition of who they rather be than all they were since conceived.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:49 am

You people are complete **** morons.

Seem to have a better grasp of federalism than most liberals here. 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:51 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:08 am

Why are you asking me?  You think I am an idiot.

But something tells me that is a state law, not federal.  A superior intellect such as you claim to have should not only know that but also understand the difference. Plus, there is no "right" to own a car.

Yap, yap.

It's about whether or not the gubmint knows about it, **** brick.

 

You need to decide what aspect of this you wish to discuss.  At the moment you are all over the map. 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:59 am

You need to decide what aspect of this you wish to discuss.  At the moment you are all over the map.

No...you are..

This is about what YOU posted.
 

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:49 am

Seem to have a better grasp of federalism than most liberals here.

That's pretty much the point Burger labors.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

No...you are..

This is about what YOU posted.

What I posted and you quotes was about FED gun ownership.  Not what Berger said.  Let me know when you are tracking.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

What I posted and you quotes was about FED gun ownership.  Not what Berger said.  Let me know when you are tracking.

What did you hear Burger say?

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:18 am

And Chief Justice Burger explained that.

He said what about FED ownership databases?

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

He said what about FED ownership databases?

His point obviates the need to ask.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

What I posted and you quotes was about FED gun ownership.  Not what Berger said.  Let me know when you are tracking.

What did you hear Burger say?

 

Remember, you think I am an idiot.  You will have to tell me what specifically what aspect catches your fancy.

I will remind you that this count went about 140 years with federal firearms laws.  

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:11 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

He said what about FED ownership databases?

His point obviates the need to ask.

 

 

You have to explain what point you think he is making.  Ya know, go on record.

Neo » 11 Jul 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:49 am

Seem to have a better grasp of federalism than most liberals here. 
 

You and peepee.

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:14 am

You have to explain what point you think he is making.  Ya know, go on record.

I already did.

You should learn to read.
 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:13 am

Remember, you think I am an idiot.  You will have to tell me what specifically what aspect catches your fancy.

I will remind you that this count went about 140 years with federal firearms laws.

But you favor that law.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:27 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:14 am

You have to explain what point you think he is making.  Ya know, go on record.

I already did.

You should learn to read.
 

 

The only thing close to it your response to Neo.  I'll chalk you up as supporting Federalism meaning you believe a state should create or enforce their laws concerning firearms.  Which I never argued against. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:31 am

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:13 am

Remember, you think I am an idiot.  You will have to tell me what specifically what aspect catches your fancy.

I will remind you that this count went about 140 years with federal firearms laws.

But you favor that law.

 

What law would that be?

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:33 am

What law would that be?

The law to which you made a vague reference. 

Huey » 11 Jul 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:32 am

The only thing close to it your response to Neo.  I'll chalk you up as supporting Federalism meaning you believe a state should create or enforce their laws concerning firearms.  Which I never argued against.

Burger was quite clear.

I don't understand what you find so difficult to grasp.